{"title":"Perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and veterinary nurses in the UK on consent for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pets.","authors":"K Gane, T Sparks, E Thomas","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be a difficult topic to discuss. The barriers surrounding its discussion are well documented in human medicine but have not previously been examined in veterinary medicine. The objectives of this study is to describe the perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey was circulated to veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses in the UK. Open and closed questions were used, with multiple choice and free text answer formats, all of which related to the timing and content, participants' preferences and perceived barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 290 responses met the inclusion criteria. Almost half of participants [140/290 (48%)] worked in first opinion practice. In total, 100 of 290 (34%) participants were \"very likely\" to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences on admission. However, 244 of 272 (90%) said they would rather discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation prospectively than at the time of a critical event. Most respondents [174/290 (60%)] stated that their practice does not include resuscitation preferences on admission consent forms despite 163 of 290 (56%) \"strongly agreeing\" that cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences should be routinely discussed on admission. Over half [168/290 (58%)] never discussed costs associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 67 of 290 (23%) never discussed likelihood of survival to discharge with the most common reason being \"unaware of survival statistics.\" Barriers to discussion included fear of causing upset, concerns for owner reactions and unrealistic owner expectations.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Veterinary professionals in the UK face multiple challenges when discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners. Whilst communication skills are an increasing area of focus in veterinary education, specific teaching on the topic of cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussion may be beneficial. Pet owner education may also mitigate some of the challenges to conversation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be a difficult topic to discuss. The barriers surrounding its discussion are well documented in human medicine but have not previously been examined in veterinary medicine. The objectives of this study is to describe the perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners.
Materials and methods: An online survey was circulated to veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses in the UK. Open and closed questions were used, with multiple choice and free text answer formats, all of which related to the timing and content, participants' preferences and perceived barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussions.
Results: In total, 290 responses met the inclusion criteria. Almost half of participants [140/290 (48%)] worked in first opinion practice. In total, 100 of 290 (34%) participants were "very likely" to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences on admission. However, 244 of 272 (90%) said they would rather discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation prospectively than at the time of a critical event. Most respondents [174/290 (60%)] stated that their practice does not include resuscitation preferences on admission consent forms despite 163 of 290 (56%) "strongly agreeing" that cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences should be routinely discussed on admission. Over half [168/290 (58%)] never discussed costs associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 67 of 290 (23%) never discussed likelihood of survival to discharge with the most common reason being "unaware of survival statistics." Barriers to discussion included fear of causing upset, concerns for owner reactions and unrealistic owner expectations.
Clinical significance: Veterinary professionals in the UK face multiple challenges when discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners. Whilst communication skills are an increasing area of focus in veterinary education, specific teaching on the topic of cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussion may be beneficial. Pet owner education may also mitigate some of the challenges to conversation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association