Perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and veterinary nurses in the UK on consent for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pets.

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
K Gane, T Sparks, E Thomas
{"title":"Perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and veterinary nurses in the UK on consent for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pets.","authors":"K Gane, T Sparks, E Thomas","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be a difficult topic to discuss. The barriers surrounding its discussion are well documented in human medicine but have not previously been examined in veterinary medicine. The objectives of this study is to describe the perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey was circulated to veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses in the UK. Open and closed questions were used, with multiple choice and free text answer formats, all of which related to the timing and content, participants' preferences and perceived barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 290 responses met the inclusion criteria. Almost half of participants [140/290 (48%)] worked in first opinion practice. In total, 100 of 290 (34%) participants were \"very likely\" to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences on admission. However, 244 of 272 (90%) said they would rather discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation prospectively than at the time of a critical event. Most respondents [174/290 (60%)] stated that their practice does not include resuscitation preferences on admission consent forms despite 163 of 290 (56%) \"strongly agreeing\" that cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences should be routinely discussed on admission. Over half [168/290 (58%)] never discussed costs associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 67 of 290 (23%) never discussed likelihood of survival to discharge with the most common reason being \"unaware of survival statistics.\" Barriers to discussion included fear of causing upset, concerns for owner reactions and unrealistic owner expectations.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Veterinary professionals in the UK face multiple challenges when discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners. Whilst communication skills are an increasing area of focus in veterinary education, specific teaching on the topic of cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussion may be beneficial. Pet owner education may also mitigate some of the challenges to conversation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be a difficult topic to discuss. The barriers surrounding its discussion are well documented in human medicine but have not previously been examined in veterinary medicine. The objectives of this study is to describe the perceptions, practices and preferences of veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners.

Materials and methods: An online survey was circulated to veterinarians and registered veterinary nurses in the UK. Open and closed questions were used, with multiple choice and free text answer formats, all of which related to the timing and content, participants' preferences and perceived barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussions.

Results: In total, 290 responses met the inclusion criteria. Almost half of participants [140/290 (48%)] worked in first opinion practice. In total, 100 of 290 (34%) participants were "very likely" to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences on admission. However, 244 of 272 (90%) said they would rather discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation prospectively than at the time of a critical event. Most respondents [174/290 (60%)] stated that their practice does not include resuscitation preferences on admission consent forms despite 163 of 290 (56%) "strongly agreeing" that cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences should be routinely discussed on admission. Over half [168/290 (58%)] never discussed costs associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 67 of 290 (23%) never discussed likelihood of survival to discharge with the most common reason being "unaware of survival statistics." Barriers to discussion included fear of causing upset, concerns for owner reactions and unrealistic owner expectations.

Clinical significance: Veterinary professionals in the UK face multiple challenges when discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with pet owners. Whilst communication skills are an increasing area of focus in veterinary education, specific teaching on the topic of cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussion may be beneficial. Pet owner education may also mitigate some of the challenges to conversation.

英国兽医和兽医护士对宠物心肺复苏同意书的看法、做法和偏好。
目的:心肺复苏可能是一个难以讨论的话题。在人类医学中,围绕心肺复苏术讨论的障碍已被充分记录,但在兽医学中还没有进行过研究。本研究旨在描述兽医和注册兽医护士对与宠物主人讨论心肺复苏术的看法、做法和偏好:向英国的兽医和注册兽医护士分发了一份在线调查。调查采用开放式和封闭式问题、多项选择和自由文本回答形式,所有问题均与心肺复苏讨论的时间和内容、参与者的偏好和感知障碍有关:共有 290 份答复符合纳入标准。几乎一半的参与者[140/290 (48%)]在第一意见实践中工作。在 290 位参与者中,共有 100 位(34%)"非常有可能 "在入院时讨论心肺复苏的优先选择。但是,272 位受访者中有 244 位(90%)表示,他们更愿意提前讨论心肺复苏,而不是在危急事件发生时。大多数受访者 [174/290 (60%)]表示,尽管 290 位受访者中有 163 位(56%)"非常同意 "在入院时例行讨论心肺复苏首选项,但他们并没有将复苏首选项纳入入院同意书。超过一半的人 [168/290 (58%)]从未讨论过与心肺复苏相关的费用,290 人中有 67 人 (23%) 从未讨论过出院后的存活可能性,最常见的原因是 "不了解存活统计数据"。讨论的障碍包括害怕引起不安、担心主人的反应以及主人不切实际的期望:临床意义:英国的兽医专业人员在与宠物主人讨论心肺复苏时面临多重挑战。虽然沟通技巧日益成为兽医教育的重点领域,但就心肺复苏讨论这一主题开展专门教学可能会有所裨益。对宠物主人的教育也可减轻谈话中的一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信