Quo Vadis, ECMO? Multidisciplinary Hybrid Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rounds During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
{"title":"Quo Vadis, ECMO? Multidisciplinary Hybrid Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rounds During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.07.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The complex care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires a high level of collaboration between multiple medical specialties and allied health professionals. Effective and timely communication between team members is imperative in ensuring patient safety. The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges in the care of patients on ECMO. Communication between team members was complicated by social distancing recommendations, increased patient volume, and staff turnover. In this article, we describe a hybrid approach to rounds that allowed team members to attend virtually or in-person to improve team communication. Weekly hybrid ECMO rounds were held to discuss patient cases and work collectively to establish patient centered goals for the following week. Critical care and surgical consultants, registered nurse ECMO specialists, RNs, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, pharmacists, ethics committee members, and patient family members were invited to attend hybrid ECMO rounds. After eight months of rounds, medical care team members were asked to provide feedback regarding the rounds format, strengths, and weaknesses. The most frequently identified strengths were improved multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. This article demonstrates that hybrid virtual and in-person patient rounds are a feasible way for ECMO programs to improve team communication and overall patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024005123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complex care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires a high level of collaboration between multiple medical specialties and allied health professionals. Effective and timely communication between team members is imperative in ensuring patient safety. The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges in the care of patients on ECMO. Communication between team members was complicated by social distancing recommendations, increased patient volume, and staff turnover. In this article, we describe a hybrid approach to rounds that allowed team members to attend virtually or in-person to improve team communication. Weekly hybrid ECMO rounds were held to discuss patient cases and work collectively to establish patient centered goals for the following week. Critical care and surgical consultants, registered nurse ECMO specialists, RNs, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, pharmacists, ethics committee members, and patient family members were invited to attend hybrid ECMO rounds. After eight months of rounds, medical care team members were asked to provide feedback regarding the rounds format, strengths, and weaknesses. The most frequently identified strengths were improved multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. This article demonstrates that hybrid virtual and in-person patient rounds are a feasible way for ECMO programs to improve team communication and overall patient care.
ECMO 何去何从?COVID-19 大流行期间的多学科混合式体外膜肺氧合循环。
体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者的护理工作十分复杂,需要多个医疗专科和专职医疗人员之间的高度协作。团队成员之间及时有效的沟通对于确保患者安全至关重要。COVID-19 大流行给 ECMO 患者的护理带来了独特的挑战。团队成员之间的沟通因社会疏远建议、患者数量增加和人员流动而变得复杂。在本文中,我们介绍了一种混合查房方法,允许团队成员以虚拟或面对面的方式参加,以改善团队沟通。每周举行一次混合 ECMO 查房,讨论患者病例,共同制定下周以患者为中心的目标。重症监护和外科顾问、注册护士 ECMO 专家、护士、灌注师、呼吸治疗师、物理和职业治疗师、药剂师、伦理委员会成员和患者家属应邀参加混合 ECMO 查房。查房八个月后,医疗团队成员被要求就查房形式、优点和缺点提供反馈意见。最常被指出的优点是改善了多学科沟通和护理的连续性。这篇文章表明,虚拟和面对面的混合患者查房是 ECMO 项目改善团队沟通和整体患者护理的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信