Effects of spironolactone on exercise blood pressure in patients at increased risk of developing heart failure: report from the HOMAGE trial

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Fang-Fei Wei, Pierpaolo Pellicori, João Pedro Ferreira, Arantxa González, Beatrice Mariottoni, De-Wei An, Job A. J. Verdonschot, Chen Liu, Fozia Z. Ahmed, Johannes Petutschnigg, Patrick Rossignol, Stephane Heymans, Joe Cuthbert, Nicolas Girerd, Andrew L. Clark, Yan Li, Tim S. Nawrot, Javier Díez, Faiez Zannad, John G. F. Cleland, Jan A. Staessen, on behalf of the HOMAGE Investigators
{"title":"Effects of spironolactone on exercise blood pressure in patients at increased risk of developing heart failure: report from the HOMAGE trial","authors":"Fang-Fei Wei, Pierpaolo Pellicori, João Pedro Ferreira, Arantxa González, Beatrice Mariottoni, De-Wei An, Job A. J. Verdonschot, Chen Liu, Fozia Z. Ahmed, Johannes Petutschnigg, Patrick Rossignol, Stephane Heymans, Joe Cuthbert, Nicolas Girerd, Andrew L. Clark, Yan Li, Tim S. Nawrot, Javier Díez, Faiez Zannad, John G. F. Cleland, Jan A. Staessen, on behalf of the HOMAGE Investigators","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01843-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"None of the spironolactone trials in heart failure (HF) assessed the blood pressure (BP) responses to exercise, while conflicting results were reported for exercise capacity. In the HOMAGE trial, 527 patients at increased HF risk were randomized to usual treatment with or without spironolactone (25–50 mg/day). The current substudy included 113 controls and 114 patients assigned spironolactone, who all completed the incremental shuttle walk test at baseline and months 1 and 9. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by EQ5D questionnaire. Between-group differences (spironolactone minus control [Δs]) were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA with adjustment for baseline and, if appropriate, additionally for sex, age and body mass index. Δs in the pre-exercise systolic/diastolic BP were −8.00 mm Hg (95% CI, −11.6 to −4.43)/−0.85 mm Hg (−2.96 to 1.26) at month 1 and −9.58 mm Hg (−14.0 to −5.19)/−3.84 mm Hg (−6.22 to −1.47) at month 9. Δs in the post-exercise systolic/diastolic BP were −8.08 mm Hg (−14.2 to −2.01)/−2.07 mm Hg (−5.79 to 1.65) and −13.3 mm Hg (−19.9 to −6.75)/−4.62 mm Hg (−8.07 to −1.17), respectively. For completed shuttles, Δs at months 1 and 9 were 2.15 (−0.10 to 4.40) and 2.49 (−0.79 to 5.67), respectively. Δs in QoL were not significant. The correlations between the exercise-induced BP increases and the number of completed shuttles were similar in both groups. In conclusion, in patients at increased risk of developing HF, spironolactone reduced the pre- and post-exercise BP, but did not improve exercise capacity or QoL.","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41440-024-01843-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41440-024-01843-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

None of the spironolactone trials in heart failure (HF) assessed the blood pressure (BP) responses to exercise, while conflicting results were reported for exercise capacity. In the HOMAGE trial, 527 patients at increased HF risk were randomized to usual treatment with or without spironolactone (25–50 mg/day). The current substudy included 113 controls and 114 patients assigned spironolactone, who all completed the incremental shuttle walk test at baseline and months 1 and 9. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by EQ5D questionnaire. Between-group differences (spironolactone minus control [Δs]) were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA with adjustment for baseline and, if appropriate, additionally for sex, age and body mass index. Δs in the pre-exercise systolic/diastolic BP were −8.00 mm Hg (95% CI, −11.6 to −4.43)/−0.85 mm Hg (−2.96 to 1.26) at month 1 and −9.58 mm Hg (−14.0 to −5.19)/−3.84 mm Hg (−6.22 to −1.47) at month 9. Δs in the post-exercise systolic/diastolic BP were −8.08 mm Hg (−14.2 to −2.01)/−2.07 mm Hg (−5.79 to 1.65) and −13.3 mm Hg (−19.9 to −6.75)/−4.62 mm Hg (−8.07 to −1.17), respectively. For completed shuttles, Δs at months 1 and 9 were 2.15 (−0.10 to 4.40) and 2.49 (−0.79 to 5.67), respectively. Δs in QoL were not significant. The correlations between the exercise-induced BP increases and the number of completed shuttles were similar in both groups. In conclusion, in patients at increased risk of developing HF, spironolactone reduced the pre- and post-exercise BP, but did not improve exercise capacity or QoL.

Abstract Image

螺内酯对心力衰竭高危患者运动血压的影响:HOMAGE 试验报告。
在针对心力衰竭(HF)的螺内酯试验中,没有一项对运动时的血压(BP)反应进行评估,而关于运动能力的报告结果也相互矛盾。在 HOMAGE 试验中,527 名心力衰竭风险增加的患者被随机分配到使用或不使用螺内酯(25-50 毫克/天)的常规治疗中。目前的子研究包括 113 名对照组和 114 名分配给螺内酯的患者,他们都在基线和第 1 个月及第 9 个月完成了增量穿梭步行测试。生活质量(QoL)通过 EQ5D 问卷进行评估。组间差异(螺内酯减去对照组 [Δs])通过重复测量方差分析进行分析,并对基线进行调整,必要时还对性别、年龄和体重指数进行调整。运动前收缩压/舒张压的Δs分别为:第1个月-8.00毫米汞柱(95% CI,-11.6至-4.43)/-0.85毫米汞柱(-2.96至1.26);第9个月-9.58毫米汞柱(-14.0至-5.19)/-3.84毫米汞柱(-6.22至-1.47)。运动后收缩压/舒张压的Δs分别为-8.08毫米汞柱(-14.2至-2.01)/-2.07毫米汞柱(-5.79至1.65)和-13.3毫米汞柱(-19.9至-6.75)/-4.62毫米汞柱(-8.07至-1.17)。对于完成的穿梭运动,第 1 个月和第 9 个月的Δs 分别为 2.15(-0.10 至 4.40)和 2.49(-0.79 至 5.67)。QoL的Δs不显著。两组患者运动引起的血压升高与完成穿梭次数之间的相关性相似。总之,对于罹患心房颤动风险较高的患者,螺内酯可降低运动前后的血压,但并不能改善运动能力或生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信