Efficacy of oral folinic acid supplementation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05762-6
Prateek Kumar Panda, Indar Kumar Sharawat, Sarama Saha, Diksha Gupta, Achanya Palayullakandi, Kiran Meena
{"title":"Efficacy of oral folinic acid supplementation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Prateek Kumar Panda, Indar Kumar Sharawat, Sarama Saha, Diksha Gupta, Achanya Palayullakandi, Kiran Meena","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05762-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral folinic acid has shown potential to improve symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are limited. This double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT aimed to compare changes in Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) scores in children with ASD aged 2-10 years, among folinic acid (2 mg/kg/day, maximum of 50 mg/day) and placebo groups at 24 weeks, in comparison with baseline. Both the groups received standard care (ABA and sensory integration therapy). Secondary objectives included changes in behavioral problems measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and serum levels of anti-folate receptor autoantibodies and folic acid, correlated with changes in autism symptom severity. Out of the 40 participants recruited in each group, 39 and 38 participants completed the 24-week follow-up in the folinic acid and placebo groups, respectively. The change in CARS score was higher in the folinic acid group (3.6 ± 0.8) compared to the placebo group (2.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Changes in CBCL total score and CBCL internalizing score were also better in the folinic acid group (19.7 ± 9.5 vs. 12.6 ± 8.4 and 15.4 ± 7.8 vs. 8.5 ± 5.7, p < 0.001 for both). High-titer anti-folate receptor autoantibodies were positive in 32/40 and 33/40 cases in the folinic acid and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.78). In the placebo group, improvement in CARS score was comparable regardless of autoantibody status (p = 0.11), but in the folinic acid group, improvement was more pronounced in the high-titer autoantibody group (p = 0.03). No adverse reactions were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral folinic acid supplementation is effective and safe in improving ASD symptoms, with more pronounced benefits in children with high titers of folate receptor autoantibodies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong> CTRI/2021/07/034901, dated 15-07-2021.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Folate receptor autoantibodies are more prevalent in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to typically developing children. • Folate receptor autoantibodies play a significant role in the neuropathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Add-on oral folinic acid supplementation is safe and effective in reducing the severity of symptoms in children with ASD. • The clinical benefits are more pronounced in children with high titers of folate receptor autoantibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"4827-4835"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05762-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral folinic acid has shown potential to improve symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are limited. This double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT aimed to compare changes in Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) scores in children with ASD aged 2-10 years, among folinic acid (2 mg/kg/day, maximum of 50 mg/day) and placebo groups at 24 weeks, in comparison with baseline. Both the groups received standard care (ABA and sensory integration therapy). Secondary objectives included changes in behavioral problems measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and serum levels of anti-folate receptor autoantibodies and folic acid, correlated with changes in autism symptom severity. Out of the 40 participants recruited in each group, 39 and 38 participants completed the 24-week follow-up in the folinic acid and placebo groups, respectively. The change in CARS score was higher in the folinic acid group (3.6 ± 0.8) compared to the placebo group (2.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Changes in CBCL total score and CBCL internalizing score were also better in the folinic acid group (19.7 ± 9.5 vs. 12.6 ± 8.4 and 15.4 ± 7.8 vs. 8.5 ± 5.7, p < 0.001 for both). High-titer anti-folate receptor autoantibodies were positive in 32/40 and 33/40 cases in the folinic acid and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.78). In the placebo group, improvement in CARS score was comparable regardless of autoantibody status (p = 0.11), but in the folinic acid group, improvement was more pronounced in the high-titer autoantibody group (p = 0.03). No adverse reactions were reported in either group.

Conclusions: Oral folinic acid supplementation is effective and safe in improving ASD symptoms, with more pronounced benefits in children with high titers of folate receptor autoantibodies.

Trial registration:  CTRI/2021/07/034901, dated 15-07-2021.

What is known: • Folate receptor autoantibodies are more prevalent in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to typically developing children. • Folate receptor autoantibodies play a significant role in the neuropathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder.

What is new: • Add-on oral folinic acid supplementation is safe and effective in reducing the severity of symptoms in children with ASD. • The clinical benefits are more pronounced in children with high titers of folate receptor autoantibodies.

Abstract Image

自闭症谱系障碍儿童口服亚叶酸补充剂的疗效:随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
口服亚叶酸已显示出改善自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童症状的潜力。然而,随机对照试验(RCT)却很有限。这项双盲、安慰剂对照研究旨在比较亚叶酸组(2 毫克/千克/天,最高 50 毫克/天)和安慰剂组在 24 周内对 2-10 岁自闭症儿童的儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)评分的变化,并与基线进行比较。两组均接受标准治疗(ABA和感觉统合疗法)。次要目标包括通过儿童行为检查表(CBCL)测量的行为问题的变化以及血清中抗叶酸受体自身抗体和叶酸水平与自闭症症状严重程度变化的相关性。在每组招募的 40 名参与者中,亚叶酸组和安慰剂组分别有 39 名和 38 名参与者完成了 24 周的随访。与安慰剂组(2.4 ± 0.7,P)相比,亚叶酸组的 CARS 评分变化更大(3.6 ± 0.8):口服亚叶酸能有效、安全地改善ASD症状,对叶酸受体自身抗体滴度高的儿童有更明显的益处: 试验注册:CTRI/2021/07/034901,日期:15-07-2021:- 与发育正常的儿童相比,叶酸受体自身抗体在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童中更为普遍。- 叶酸受体自身抗体在自闭症谱系障碍的神经发病机制中起着重要作用:- 额外口服亚叶酸补充剂可安全有效地减轻自闭症谱系障碍儿童的症状严重程度。- 在叶酸受体自身抗体滴度较高的儿童中,临床疗效更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信