Improving the local excision strategy for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy: Surgical and oncological results

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108639
{"title":"Improving the local excision strategy for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy: Surgical and oncological results","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Local excision (LE) for good responders after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer is oncologically safe. Although the GRECCAR 2 trial did not demonstrate any advantages in morbidity, it provided useful information for optimising patient selection. This study assessed the impact of these results on our practice by focusing on the evolution of our selection criteria and management modalities for these patients over 10 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected using our retrospective database of 110 patients who underwent LE after CRT for low and middle rectal cancer between 2010 and 2022 before (Group 1) and after (Group 2) consideration of the GRECCAR 2 trial results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pretherapeutic selection criteria remained stable after the GRECCAR 2 trial, although in Group 2, completion total mesorectal excision (TME) for ypT2 tumours with favourable tumour regression grade was abandoned, improving the organ preservation rate at 1 year from 63.3 % to 91.8 % (p &lt; 0.01). The operative time and length of stay after LE were reduced by half in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.01). The intention-to-treat rate for severe morbidity was also halved, but was not significant (8.2 % vs. 16.3 %, p = 0.24). Among patients with a 3-year follow-up data, disease-free survival was comparable between Group 1 (89.8 %) and Group 2 (85.4 %) (p = 0.51) with one locoregional recurrence in each group (2.0 % vs. 2.1 %, p = 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LE is a safe and effective strategy when performed in a “high-volume” centre. Improved methods for assessing tumour response and the selection criteria for completion TME enhanced surgical outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324006917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Local excision (LE) for good responders after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer is oncologically safe. Although the GRECCAR 2 trial did not demonstrate any advantages in morbidity, it provided useful information for optimising patient selection. This study assessed the impact of these results on our practice by focusing on the evolution of our selection criteria and management modalities for these patients over 10 years.

Methods

Data were collected using our retrospective database of 110 patients who underwent LE after CRT for low and middle rectal cancer between 2010 and 2022 before (Group 1) and after (Group 2) consideration of the GRECCAR 2 trial results.

Results

The pretherapeutic selection criteria remained stable after the GRECCAR 2 trial, although in Group 2, completion total mesorectal excision (TME) for ypT2 tumours with favourable tumour regression grade was abandoned, improving the organ preservation rate at 1 year from 63.3 % to 91.8 % (p < 0.01). The operative time and length of stay after LE were reduced by half in Group 2 (p < 0.01). The intention-to-treat rate for severe morbidity was also halved, but was not significant (8.2 % vs. 16.3 %, p = 0.24). Among patients with a 3-year follow-up data, disease-free survival was comparable between Group 1 (89.8 %) and Group 2 (85.4 %) (p = 0.51) with one locoregional recurrence in each group (2.0 % vs. 2.1 %, p = 1).

Conclusion

LE is a safe and effective strategy when performed in a “high-volume” centre. Improved methods for assessing tumour response and the selection criteria for completion TME enhanced surgical outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.

改进化放疗后直肠癌的局部切除策略:手术和肿瘤学结果
导言:对化疗放疗(CRT)后反应良好的直肠癌患者实施局部切除术(LE)在肿瘤学上是安全的。尽管 GRECCAR 2 试验并未证明在发病率方面有任何优势,但它为优化患者选择提供了有用的信息。本研究评估了这些结果对我们临床实践的影响,重点研究了 10 年来我们对这些患者的选择标准和管理模式的演变:在考虑 GRECCAR 2 试验结果之前(第 1 组)和之后(第 2 组),通过我们的回顾性数据库收集了 2010 年至 2022 年期间因中低端直肠癌接受 CRT 治疗后接受 LE 治疗的 110 名患者的数据:结果:GRECCAR 2试验后,治疗前的选择标准保持稳定,但在第2组中,放弃了对肿瘤消退分级良好的ypT2肿瘤进行完整的全直肠系膜切除术(TME),从而将1年的器官保留率从63.3%提高到91.8%(P 结论:LE是一种安全有效的治疗方法:在 "高容量 "中心进行 LE 是一种安全有效的策略。肿瘤反应评估方法和完成 TME 的选择标准的改进提高了手术效果,但不会影响肿瘤结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信