Rescue therapy of early neurological deterioration in lacunar stroke.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Soo-Hyun Park, Jonguk Kim, Cindy W Yoon, Hee-Kwon Park, Joung-Ho Rha
{"title":"Rescue therapy of early neurological deterioration in lacunar stroke.","authors":"Soo-Hyun Park, Jonguk Kim, Cindy W Yoon, Hee-Kwon Park, Joung-Ho Rha","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03825-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early neurological deterioration (END) occurs in many patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a variety of causes. Although pharmacologically induced hypertension (PIH) and anticoagulants have been investigated in several clinical trials for the treatment of END, the efficacy and safety of these treatments remain unclear. Here, we investigated whether PIH or anticoagulation is better as a rescue therapy for the progression of END in patients with lacunar stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients with lacunar stroke who received rescue therapy with END within 3 days of symptom onset between April 2014 and August 2021. In the PIH group, phenylephrine was administered intravenously for 24 h and slowly tapered when symptoms improved or after 5 days of PIH. In the anticoagulation group, argatroban was administered continuously intravenously for 2 days and twice daily for next 5 days. We compared END recovery, defined as improvement in NIHSS from baseline, excellent outcomes (0 or 1 mRS at 3 months), and safety profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4818 patients with the lacunar stroke, END occurred in 147 patients. Seventy-nine patients with END received PIH (46.9%) and 68 patients (46.3%) received anticoagulation therapy. There was no significant difference in age (P = 0.82) and sex (P = 0.87) between the two groups. Compared to the anticoagulation group, the PIH group had a higher incidence of END recovery (77.2% vs. 51.5%, P < 0.01) and excellent outcomes (34.2% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.04). PIH was associated with END (HR 2.49; 95% CI 1.06-5.81, P = 0.04). PIH remained associated with END recovery (adjusted HR 3.91; 95% CI 1.19-12.90, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes, like hemorrhagic conversion and mortality, were not significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a rescue therapy for the progression of END in lacunar stroke patients, PIH with phenylephrine was more effective with similar safety compared to anticoagulation with argatroban.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03825-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) occurs in many patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a variety of causes. Although pharmacologically induced hypertension (PIH) and anticoagulants have been investigated in several clinical trials for the treatment of END, the efficacy and safety of these treatments remain unclear. Here, we investigated whether PIH or anticoagulation is better as a rescue therapy for the progression of END in patients with lacunar stroke.

Methods: This study included patients with lacunar stroke who received rescue therapy with END within 3 days of symptom onset between April 2014 and August 2021. In the PIH group, phenylephrine was administered intravenously for 24 h and slowly tapered when symptoms improved or after 5 days of PIH. In the anticoagulation group, argatroban was administered continuously intravenously for 2 days and twice daily for next 5 days. We compared END recovery, defined as improvement in NIHSS from baseline, excellent outcomes (0 or 1 mRS at 3 months), and safety profile.

Results: Among the 4818 patients with the lacunar stroke, END occurred in 147 patients. Seventy-nine patients with END received PIH (46.9%) and 68 patients (46.3%) received anticoagulation therapy. There was no significant difference in age (P = 0.82) and sex (P = 0.87) between the two groups. Compared to the anticoagulation group, the PIH group had a higher incidence of END recovery (77.2% vs. 51.5%, P < 0.01) and excellent outcomes (34.2% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.04). PIH was associated with END (HR 2.49; 95% CI 1.06-5.81, P = 0.04). PIH remained associated with END recovery (adjusted HR 3.91; 95% CI 1.19-12.90, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes, like hemorrhagic conversion and mortality, were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions: As a rescue therapy for the progression of END in lacunar stroke patients, PIH with phenylephrine was more effective with similar safety compared to anticoagulation with argatroban.

腔隙性中风早期神经功能恶化的抢救治疗。
背景:许多急性缺血性卒中患者会因各种原因出现早期神经功能恶化(END)。虽然药物性高血压(PIH)和抗凝药物已在多项临床试验中用于治疗END,但这些治疗方法的有效性和安全性仍不明确。在此,我们研究了PIH或抗凝作为腔隙性卒中患者END进展的抢救疗法是否更好:本研究纳入了 2014 年 4 月至 2021 年 8 月间在症状出现 3 天内接受END 抢救治疗的腔隙性脑卒中患者。在PIH组,苯肾上腺素静脉注射24小时,症状改善或PIH 5天后缓慢减量。在抗凝组,阿加曲班持续静脉注射 2 天,随后 5 天每天两次。我们比较了END的恢复情况(定义为NIHSS较基线有所改善)、优良疗效(3个月时mRS为0或1)和安全性:在 4818 名腔隙性中风患者中,有 147 名患者发生了END。79名END患者接受了PIH治疗(46.9%),68名患者(46.3%)接受了抗凝治疗。两组患者在年龄(P = 0.82)和性别(P = 0.87)方面无明显差异。与抗凝治疗组相比,PIH 组的END 恢复率更高(77.2% 对 51.5%,P 结论:PIH 组的END 恢复率低于抗凝治疗组:作为腔隙性卒中患者END进展的抢救疗法,与阿加曲班抗凝相比,使用苯肾上腺素的PIH更有效,且安全性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信