Increases of N2O emissions due to enhanced nitrification in a sandy loam soil under long-term manure application

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Xia Liao, Christoph Müller, Heyang Sun, Junji Yuan, Deyan Liu, Zengming Chen, Tiehu He, Anne Jansen-Willems, Jiafa Luo, Weixin Ding
{"title":"Increases of N2O emissions due to enhanced nitrification in a sandy loam soil under long-term manure application","authors":"Xia Liao, Christoph Müller, Heyang Sun, Junji Yuan, Deyan Liu, Zengming Chen, Tiehu He, Anne Jansen-Willems, Jiafa Luo, Weixin Ding","doi":"10.1007/s00374-024-01861-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><sup>15</sup>N tracing was carried out on sandy loam soil amended with (i) mineral nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (NPK) alone, (ii) half mineral N and half N from chicken manure (HFC), or (iii) half mineral N and half N from cattle manure (HCM), for 8 years. Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions during incubation were 30.2 µg N kg<sup>− 1</sup> in the NPK treatment, which increased to 37.8 and 51.3 µg N kg<sup>− 1</sup> in the HFC and HCM treatments, respectively. The majority of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in all the treatments were attributed to nitrification (81.0% in the NPK treatment, 83.0% in the HFC treatment, and 85.1% in the HCM treatment). Compared with NPK, HCM treatment caused a significant increase in the gross rate of nitrification, while HFC treatment slightly enhanced the rate of dissimilatory NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> reduction to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. Additionally, HFC treatment achieved higher gross rates of organic N mineralization, and both HFC and HCM treatments had higher NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> mineralization-immobilization turnover (<i>MI</i><sub><i>A</i></sub><i>T</i>) rates than NPK treatment. The results suggest that application of cattle or chicken manure increased soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> availability. The gross rate of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> adsorption in the HCM treatment was greater than that in the NPK treatment, while the release of adsorbed NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> in the HFC treatment was slower than that in the NPK treatment, indicating that application of cattle or chicken manure lowered the potential for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> leaching in soil. Overall, combining cattle or chicken manure with mineral fertilizer decreased NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> availability but increased NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> availability, leading to higher N<sub>2</sub>O emissions through nitrification. Our results suggest that organic manures should be applied with nitrification inhibitors in sandy loam soil containing low organic carbon to increase soil fertility and mitigate N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9210,"journal":{"name":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-024-01861-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

15N tracing was carried out on sandy loam soil amended with (i) mineral nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (NPK) alone, (ii) half mineral N and half N from chicken manure (HFC), or (iii) half mineral N and half N from cattle manure (HCM), for 8 years. Cumulative N2O emissions during incubation were 30.2 µg N kg− 1 in the NPK treatment, which increased to 37.8 and 51.3 µg N kg− 1 in the HFC and HCM treatments, respectively. The majority of N2O emissions in all the treatments were attributed to nitrification (81.0% in the NPK treatment, 83.0% in the HFC treatment, and 85.1% in the HCM treatment). Compared with NPK, HCM treatment caused a significant increase in the gross rate of nitrification, while HFC treatment slightly enhanced the rate of dissimilatory NO3 reduction to NH4+. Additionally, HFC treatment achieved higher gross rates of organic N mineralization, and both HFC and HCM treatments had higher NH4+ mineralization-immobilization turnover (MIAT) rates than NPK treatment. The results suggest that application of cattle or chicken manure increased soil NH4+ availability. The gross rate of NO3 adsorption in the HCM treatment was greater than that in the NPK treatment, while the release of adsorbed NO3 in the HFC treatment was slower than that in the NPK treatment, indicating that application of cattle or chicken manure lowered the potential for NO3 leaching in soil. Overall, combining cattle or chicken manure with mineral fertilizer decreased NO3 availability but increased NH4+ availability, leading to higher N2O emissions through nitrification. Our results suggest that organic manures should be applied with nitrification inhibitors in sandy loam soil containing low organic carbon to increase soil fertility and mitigate N2O emissions.

Abstract Image

在长期施用粪肥的砂质壤土中,硝化作用增强导致一氧化二氮排放量增加
在使用以下肥料的沙质壤土上进行了 15N 追踪:(i) 仅使用矿物氮磷钾肥 (NPK);(ii) 使用一半矿物氮肥和一半鸡粪氮肥 (HFC);或 (iii) 使用一半矿物氮肥和一半牛粪氮肥 (HCM),为期 8 年。在 NPK 处理中,孵化期间的累积一氧化二氮排放量为 30.2 µg N kg-1,而在 HFC 和 HCM 处理中,排放量分别增至 37.8 和 51.3 µg N kg-1。在所有处理中,大部分 N2O 排放都归因于硝化作用(NPK 处理中为 81.0%,HFC 处理中为 83.0%,HCM 处理中为 85.1%)。与 NPK 处理相比,HCM 处理显著提高了硝化总速率,而 HFC 处理则略微提高了将 NO3- 还原成 NH4+ 的异化作用速率。此外,HFC 处理实现了更高的有机氮矿化总速率,而且与 NPK 处理相比,HFC 和 HCM 处理都具有更高的 NH4+ 矿化-移动周转率(MIAT)。结果表明,施用牛粪或鸡粪增加了土壤中 NH4+ 的可用性。HCM 处理中 NO3- 的总吸附率高于 NPK 处理,而 HFC 处理中吸附的 NO3- 的释放率低于 NPK 处理,这表明施用牛粪或鸡粪降低了土壤中 NO3- 沥滤的可能性。总体而言,将牛粪或鸡粪与矿物肥料结合使用会降低 NO3- 的可用性,但会增加 NH4+ 的可用性,从而通过硝化作用导致更高的 N2O 排放。我们的研究结果表明,在有机碳含量较低的砂壤土中施用有机肥时,应同时施用硝化抑制剂,以提高土壤肥力,减少 N2O 排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Biology and Fertility of Soils 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
10.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Biology and Fertility of Soils publishes in English original papers, reviews and short communications on all fundamental and applied aspects of biology – microflora and microfauna - and fertility of soils. It offers a forum for research aimed at broadening the understanding of biological functions, processes and interactions in soils, particularly concerning the increasing demands of agriculture, deforestation and industrialization. The journal includes articles on techniques and methods that evaluate processes, biogeochemical interactions and ecological stresses, and sometimes presents special issues on relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信