Championing Civility in the Clinical Learning Environment: Evaluation of a Novel Training Program.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sharon L Shofer, Jane P Gagliardi, Stephanie Bryant, Apurva M Khedagi, Dinushika Mohottige, Ada Gregory, Aimee K Zaas, Tracy Truong, Betty B Staples
{"title":"Championing Civility in the Clinical Learning Environment: Evaluation of a Novel Training Program.","authors":"Sharon L Shofer, Jane P Gagliardi, Stephanie Bryant, Apurva M Khedagi, Dinushika Mohottige, Ada Gregory, Aimee K Zaas, Tracy Truong, Betty B Staples","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Incivility in the health care workplace is increasing and negatively impacts everyone in the environment, including health care team members and the patients and families they serve. This study examined the efficacy and impact of Civility Champions (CCs), a novel training program for a multidisciplinary cohort of faculty and graduate medical education (GME) trainees based in principles of trauma-informed care, nonviolent communication, and restorative practices.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Participants were 39 faculty and GME trainees representing 6 departments in a major academic medical center. The concurrent, mixed-methods study employed the Kirkpatrick New World Model as a framework for the creation of the evaluation tools as well as to analyze and report the results of the study. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis examined participants' reactions, perceived learning, workplace use of the skills following training, and initial indicators of whether the program is on track to meet its goals.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Participants found CCs training to be valuable (84.6% agree or strongly agree that training was relevant and would recommend it to others). Post-training, CCs felt an increased sense of confidence and commitment using the skills and knowledge learned as indicated by a positive average change score (P < .05) on all measures. At the 6-month survey, 70% of CCs had employed the skills. Results on the implementation of the CCs program found that key success factors include improving program visibility, providing opportunities for skill refreshment, and fostering a supportive community.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>This study expanded a novel training program to multidisciplinary departments and provided early evaluation of the efficacy of the training in the health care workplace. CCs training showed significant measurable benefit using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Future iterations will include training interdisciplinary cohorts and will attempt to assess the program's impact on institutional culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: Incivility in the health care workplace is increasing and negatively impacts everyone in the environment, including health care team members and the patients and families they serve. This study examined the efficacy and impact of Civility Champions (CCs), a novel training program for a multidisciplinary cohort of faculty and graduate medical education (GME) trainees based in principles of trauma-informed care, nonviolent communication, and restorative practices.

Approach: Participants were 39 faculty and GME trainees representing 6 departments in a major academic medical center. The concurrent, mixed-methods study employed the Kirkpatrick New World Model as a framework for the creation of the evaluation tools as well as to analyze and report the results of the study. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis examined participants' reactions, perceived learning, workplace use of the skills following training, and initial indicators of whether the program is on track to meet its goals.

Outcomes: Participants found CCs training to be valuable (84.6% agree or strongly agree that training was relevant and would recommend it to others). Post-training, CCs felt an increased sense of confidence and commitment using the skills and knowledge learned as indicated by a positive average change score (P < .05) on all measures. At the 6-month survey, 70% of CCs had employed the skills. Results on the implementation of the CCs program found that key success factors include improving program visibility, providing opportunities for skill refreshment, and fostering a supportive community.

Next steps: This study expanded a novel training program to multidisciplinary departments and provided early evaluation of the efficacy of the training in the health care workplace. CCs training showed significant measurable benefit using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Future iterations will include training interdisciplinary cohorts and will attempt to assess the program's impact on institutional culture.

在临床学习环境中倡导文明:评估一项新颖的培训计划
问题:医疗保健工作场所的不文明现象日益增多,对环境中的每个人都产生了负面影响,包括医疗保健团队成员以及他们所服务的患者和家属。这项研究考察了 "文明倡导者"(CCs)的效果和影响,这是一项针对多学科教职员工和医学研究生教育(GME)受训人员的新颖培训计划,以创伤知情护理、非暴力沟通和恢复性实践原则为基础:参与者包括 39 名教师和医学研究生教育培训生,他们分别来自一家大型学术医疗中心的 6 个科室。这项同步进行的混合方法研究采用了柯克帕特里克新世界模型(Kirkpatrick New World Model)作为框架,用于创建评估工具以及分析和报告研究结果。定量和定性数据分析考察了参与者的反应、感知到的学习效果、培训后技能在工作场所的使用情况,以及该计划是否正在实现其目标的初步指标:结果:参与者认为 CC 培训很有价值(84.6% 的人同意或非常同意培训与工作相关,并会向他人推荐)。培训结束后,CCs 在使用所学技能和知识方面的信心和决心都有所增强,所有测量指标的平均变化分值均为正值(P < .05)。在为期 6 个月的调查中,70% 的社区协调中心采用了所学技能。CCs计划的实施结果表明,成功的关键因素包括提高计划的知名度、提供技能更新的机会以及培养一个支持性社区:这项研究将一项新颖的培训计划推广到了多学科部门,并对医疗保健工作场所的培训效果进行了早期评估。通过定量和定性测量,CCs 培训显示出明显的可衡量效益。未来的迭代将包括跨学科队列培训,并将尝试评估该计划对机构文化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信