Safety and feasibility of conversion from venoarterial to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric patients: A case series.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kathryn M Maselli, Nikhil R Shah, Keyonna Williams, Brianna Spencer, Samir K Gadepalli, Arul S Thirumoorthi
{"title":"Safety and feasibility of conversion from venoarterial to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric patients: A case series.","authors":"Kathryn M Maselli, Nikhil R Shah, Keyonna Williams, Brianna Spencer, Samir K Gadepalli, Arul S Thirumoorthi","doi":"10.1177/02676591241282578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In children requiring venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for long durations, conversion to venovenous (VV) support may be advantageous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of conversion from VA to VV ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of all children who underwent conversion from VA to VV ECMO at a single institution, from 2015 to 2022. Indications for and methods of conversion were examined as well as adverse events including re-operation, ischemic complications, renal failure, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 422 pediatric patients on initial VA ECMO, 4 children (0.9%) underwent conversion from VA to VV support. The indications for cannulation were: respiratory failure due to COVID19, respiratory failure due to congenital diaphragmatic hernia, cardiac dysfunction following heart transplant, and sepsis with associated left ventricular dysfunction. The indications for conversion were bleeding from the arterial cannula and ongoing respiratory failure. The median time to conversion was 6.5 days (range 4-54 days) and the median length of ECMO run was 34.5 days. Three patients required renal replacement therapy with two progressing to long-term dialysis. There were no ischemic limb complications although one patient developed a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm that required re-operation. Three patients survived to discharge. One patient was unable to be decannulated after conversion and mechanical support was withdrawn.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conversion to VV ECMO from initial VA ECMO cannulation is feasible but a rare event. For patients with cardiac stability but continued need for respiratory support, conversion to VV ECMO can be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241282578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In children requiring venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for long durations, conversion to venovenous (VV) support may be advantageous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of conversion from VA to VV ECMO.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of all children who underwent conversion from VA to VV ECMO at a single institution, from 2015 to 2022. Indications for and methods of conversion were examined as well as adverse events including re-operation, ischemic complications, renal failure, and mortality.

Results: Of 422 pediatric patients on initial VA ECMO, 4 children (0.9%) underwent conversion from VA to VV support. The indications for cannulation were: respiratory failure due to COVID19, respiratory failure due to congenital diaphragmatic hernia, cardiac dysfunction following heart transplant, and sepsis with associated left ventricular dysfunction. The indications for conversion were bleeding from the arterial cannula and ongoing respiratory failure. The median time to conversion was 6.5 days (range 4-54 days) and the median length of ECMO run was 34.5 days. Three patients required renal replacement therapy with two progressing to long-term dialysis. There were no ischemic limb complications although one patient developed a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm that required re-operation. Three patients survived to discharge. One patient was unable to be decannulated after conversion and mechanical support was withdrawn.

Conclusions: Conversion to VV ECMO from initial VA ECMO cannulation is feasible but a rare event. For patients with cardiac stability but continued need for respiratory support, conversion to VV ECMO can be considered.

儿科患者从静脉动脉转为静脉体外膜氧合的安全性和可行性:病例系列。
导言:对于需要长期使用静脉动脉(VA)体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的儿童来说,转用静脉静脉(VV)支持可能更有优势。本研究旨在评估从 VA 转为 VV ECMO 的可行性和安全性:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2015 年至 2022 年在一家医疗机构接受从 VA 到 VV ECMO 转换的所有患儿。研究了转换的指征和方法以及不良事件,包括再次手术、缺血并发症、肾功能衰竭和死亡率:在 422 名初次接受 VA ECMO 的儿科患者中,有 4 名儿童(0.9%)从 VA 转为 VV 支持。插管适应症为:COVID19 导致的呼吸衰竭、先天性膈疝、心脏移植后心功能不全以及伴有左心室功能障碍的脓毒症。转院指征为动脉插管出血和持续呼吸衰竭。转换时间的中位数为 6.5 天(4-54 天不等),ECMO 运行时间的中位数为 34.5 天。三名患者需要进行肾脏替代治疗,其中两人需要长期透析。虽然一名患者出现股动脉假性动脉瘤,需要再次手术,但没有出现肢体缺血性并发症。三名患者存活出院。一名患者在转为 VV ECMO 后无法拔管,因此撤消了机械支持:结论:从最初的 VA ECMO 插管转换为 VV ECMO 是可行的,但并不多见。对于心脏功能稳定但仍需呼吸支持的患者,可以考虑转为 VV ECMO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信