Exploring the Effects of Age at Menarche and Pregnancy on Myopia.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nicholas Jiemin Ong, David A Mackey Ao, Michael Hunter, Samantha Sze-Yee Lee
{"title":"Exploring the Effects of Age at Menarche and Pregnancy on Myopia.","authors":"Nicholas Jiemin Ong, David A Mackey Ao, Michael Hunter, Samantha Sze-Yee Lee","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2379973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Associations between age at menarche and myopia have been observed in studies that included older women. Furthermore, pregnancy-related hormone surges in young women are associated with short-term changes in refractive error, although the long-term effects are less known. This study explored associations of age at menarche and parity with refractive error and ocular biometry in young women, and the relationship between age at menarche and refractive error in middle-aged adults for comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-based young women underwent eye examinations at 20 and 28 years old. Information on age at menarche and parity were collected prospectively. The older cohort underwent an eye examination and information on age at menarche was self-reported retrospectively. Cross-sectional associations between age at menarche and myopia were explored in both cohorts. Associations between parity and 8-year longitudinal change in refractive error measures were explored in the young cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cross-sectional analyses comprised 429 young (age 18-22) and 1,818 older (age 46-69) women. No associations were found between age at menarche and myopia or ocular biometry measures in either cohort. The longitudinal analysis (<i>n</i> = 269 women) revealed that for each pregnancy carried to full term, there rate of lens thickening increased by 0.004 mm/year (95% CI = 0.002-0.007). No other associations between parity and refractive error or ocular biometry were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no association between age at menarche and myopia or its related measures. While pregnancy was associated with thicker lens in the long term, there is no lasting effect on refractive error.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2379973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Associations between age at menarche and myopia have been observed in studies that included older women. Furthermore, pregnancy-related hormone surges in young women are associated with short-term changes in refractive error, although the long-term effects are less known. This study explored associations of age at menarche and parity with refractive error and ocular biometry in young women, and the relationship between age at menarche and refractive error in middle-aged adults for comparison.

Methods: Community-based young women underwent eye examinations at 20 and 28 years old. Information on age at menarche and parity were collected prospectively. The older cohort underwent an eye examination and information on age at menarche was self-reported retrospectively. Cross-sectional associations between age at menarche and myopia were explored in both cohorts. Associations between parity and 8-year longitudinal change in refractive error measures were explored in the young cohort.

Results: The cross-sectional analyses comprised 429 young (age 18-22) and 1,818 older (age 46-69) women. No associations were found between age at menarche and myopia or ocular biometry measures in either cohort. The longitudinal analysis (n = 269 women) revealed that for each pregnancy carried to full term, there rate of lens thickening increased by 0.004 mm/year (95% CI = 0.002-0.007). No other associations between parity and refractive error or ocular biometry were found.

Conclusion: There is no association between age at menarche and myopia or its related measures. While pregnancy was associated with thicker lens in the long term, there is no lasting effect on refractive error.

探索初潮年龄和怀孕对近视的影响。
目的:在对年龄较大的女性进行的研究中发现,初潮年龄与近视之间存在关联。此外,年轻女性与怀孕有关的激素激增与屈光不正的短期变化有关,但其长期影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了初潮年龄和胎次与年轻女性屈光不正和眼部生物测量的关系,并与中年人初潮年龄和屈光不正的关系进行了比较:方法:社区年轻女性在 20 岁和 28 岁时接受眼科检查。方法:以社区为基础,对 20 岁和 28 岁的年轻女性进行眼科检查。年龄较大的组群接受了眼科检查,初潮年龄的信息是通过回顾性自我报告的。在这两个队列中探讨了初潮年龄与近视之间的横断面关联。在年轻组群中探讨了奇偶性与 8 年屈光不正测量值纵向变化之间的关系:横断面分析包括 429 名年轻女性(18-22 岁)和 1,818 名老年女性(46-69 岁)。在这两个组群中,均未发现初潮年龄与近视或眼部生物测量指标之间存在关联。纵向分析(n = 269 名妇女)显示,每怀孕一胎,晶状体增厚率就会增加 0.004 毫米/年(95% CI = 0.002-0.007)。结论:男性怀孕年龄与屈光不正或眼部生物测量之间没有关联:结论:初潮年龄与近视或其相关指标之间没有关联。结论:月经初潮年龄与近视或其相关指标之间没有关联。虽然从长远来看,怀孕与晶状体变厚有关,但对屈光不正没有持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信