Policy Proposals for Mitigating Intensive Care Unit Strain: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ivor S Douglas, Anuj Mehta, Jason Mansoori
{"title":"Policy Proposals for Mitigating Intensive Care Unit Strain: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Ivor S Douglas, Anuj Mehta, Jason Mansoori","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-356FR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intensive care unit (ICU) strain, characterized by a discrepancy between perceived or actual intensive care resources and demand, significantly impacts patient outcomes and healthcare worker well-being. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated ICU strain, leading to increased mortality and extended hospital stays, affecting both critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. A systematic review identified 16 leading and lagging indicators of ICU capacity strain, including queuing, premature and after-hours ICU discharge, use of temporary space, length of stay, burnout, staffing and nurse-to-patient ratio, ICU census, acuity and turnover, standardized mortality ratio, readmissions, availability of critical supplies, ventilator use, and surgery cancellation. However, variability in operational definitions and limited evidence regarding the reliability, validity, usability, and feasibility limit the value of single indicators for informed strategic planning and policy guidance. Regional and national policies and programs are essential to enhance real-time monitoring for effective management of critical care resources, and they mitigate the impact of ICU strain, facilitating complex interhospital transfers to reduce strain and ensuring comprehensive strategies for enhancing ICU resilience. Proactive regional cooperation is advocated for policy formulation, knowledge exchange, and resource allocation to anticipate and mitigate ICU strain, ensuring equitable healthcare access during global health crises. The policy implications for future preparedness emphasize the importance of evidence-based triage and adaptable patient management strategies alongside ethical considerations in resource allocation and the role of behavioral economic insights in optimizing resource utilization and collaborative healthcare practices. This multifaceted approach for addressing ICU strain comprehensively and effectively during a pandemic would promote health equity and enhance healthcare system resilience under both routine operations and crisis conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1633-1642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-356FR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) strain, characterized by a discrepancy between perceived or actual intensive care resources and demand, significantly impacts patient outcomes and healthcare worker well-being. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated ICU strain, leading to increased mortality and extended hospital stays, affecting both critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. A systematic review identified 16 leading and lagging indicators of ICU capacity strain, including queuing, premature and after-hours ICU discharge, use of temporary space, length of stay, burnout, staffing and nurse-to-patient ratio, ICU census, acuity and turnover, standardized mortality ratio, readmissions, availability of critical supplies, ventilator use, and surgery cancellation. However, variability in operational definitions and limited evidence regarding the reliability, validity, usability, and feasibility limit the value of single indicators for informed strategic planning and policy guidance. Regional and national policies and programs are essential to enhance real-time monitoring for effective management of critical care resources, and they mitigate the impact of ICU strain, facilitating complex interhospital transfers to reduce strain and ensuring comprehensive strategies for enhancing ICU resilience. Proactive regional cooperation is advocated for policy formulation, knowledge exchange, and resource allocation to anticipate and mitigate ICU strain, ensuring equitable healthcare access during global health crises. The policy implications for future preparedness emphasize the importance of evidence-based triage and adaptable patient management strategies alongside ethical considerations in resource allocation and the role of behavioral economic insights in optimizing resource utilization and collaborative healthcare practices. This multifaceted approach for addressing ICU strain comprehensively and effectively during a pandemic would promote health equity and enhance healthcare system resilience under both routine operations and crisis conditions.

减轻重症监护室压力的政策建议:从 COVID-19 大流行中获得的启示。
重症监护室紧张的特点是感知或实际的重症监护资源与需求之间存在差异,这会严重影响患者的治疗效果和医护人员的福利。COVID-19 大流行加剧了重症监护室的压力,导致死亡率上升和住院时间延长,COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 重症患者均受到影响。一项系统性综述确定了 16 个 ICU 容量紧张的先行和滞后指标,包括排队、ICU 提前和下班后出院、临时空间的使用、住院时间、职业倦怠、人员配备和护士与患者的比例、ICU 人数、严重程度和更替率、标准化死亡率 (SMR)、再入院率、关键用品的可用性、呼吸机的使用和手术取消。然而,由于操作定义的差异性以及有关可靠性、有效性、可用性和可行性的证据有限,限制了单一指标在知情战略规划和政策指导方面的价值。区域和国家政策与计划对于加强实时监测以有效管理重症监护资源、减轻重症监护室压力的影响、促进复杂的院际转运以减轻压力以及确保增强重症监护室恢复能力的综合战略至关重要。我们提倡在政策制定、知识交流和资源分配方面开展积极的区域合作,以预测和缓解重症监护室的压力,确保在全球卫生危机期间公平地获得医疗保健服务。对未来准备工作的政策影响强调了循证分诊和适应性患者管理策略的重要性,以及资源分配中的伦理考虑因素和行为经济学观点在优化资源利用和合作医疗实践中的作用。这种在大流行病期间全面有效地解决重症监护室压力的多层面方法将促进健康公平,并增强医疗系统在常规运行和危机条件下的应变能力。本文根据知识共享署名非商业性无衍生许可证 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) 条款开放获取和发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信