Effects of a Remote Multimodal Psychoeducational Intervention Nursing Program on Mental Health and Quality of Life of Renal Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mingzhu Dong, Xiaoting Sun, Ying Hu
{"title":"Effects of a Remote Multimodal Psychoeducational Intervention Nursing Program on Mental Health and Quality of Life of Renal Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mingzhu Dong, Xiaoting Sun, Ying Hu","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247707.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma can potentially compromise the mental well-being and overall quality of life of survivors. Long-term psychological education interventions that are delivered remotely through various modalities have shown promise in enhancing the psychological well-being and quality of life of cancer patients. This study investigates the effect of remote multimodal psychoeducational interventions on mental well-being and quality of life of renal cell carcinoma survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted to compare patients receiving remote psychological interventions (exposure group) with those receiving standard care (control group). Following the interventions, various data sets including general demographic information, and assessments from the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), the Brief Fatigue Inventory-Chinese version (BFI-C), the Distress Thermometer (DT), and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were gathered and analysed for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 116 renal cell carcinoma survivors, with 52 in the exposure group and 64 in the control group. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). After the intervention, the exposure group had significantly lower scores than the control group on HAMA (14.63 vs. 16.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), HAMD (13.63 vs. 16.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001), BFI-C (52.31 vs. 57.65, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and DT (3.94 vs. 4.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, the exposure group had significantly higher total score of EORTC QLQ-C30 (69.22 vs. 65.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote multimodal psychoeducational interventions demonstrate a notable impact in mitigating adverse emotions, exhaustion, and discomfort experienced by survivors of renal cell carcinoma. Such interventions should be actively promoted in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"77 7","pages":"789-795"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247707.110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma can potentially compromise the mental well-being and overall quality of life of survivors. Long-term psychological education interventions that are delivered remotely through various modalities have shown promise in enhancing the psychological well-being and quality of life of cancer patients. This study investigates the effect of remote multimodal psychoeducational interventions on mental well-being and quality of life of renal cell carcinoma survivors.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to compare patients receiving remote psychological interventions (exposure group) with those receiving standard care (control group). Following the interventions, various data sets including general demographic information, and assessments from the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), the Brief Fatigue Inventory-Chinese version (BFI-C), the Distress Thermometer (DT), and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were gathered and analysed for comparison.

Results: This study included 116 renal cell carcinoma survivors, with 52 in the exposure group and 64 in the control group. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). After the intervention, the exposure group had significantly lower scores than the control group on HAMA (14.63 vs. 16.66, p < 0.001), HAMD (13.63 vs. 16.36, p < 0.001), BFI-C (52.31 vs. 57.65, p < 0.001), and DT (3.94 vs. 4.98, p < 0.001). Additionally, the exposure group had significantly higher total score of EORTC QLQ-C30 (69.22 vs. 65.59, p < 0.001) than the control group.

Conclusions: Remote multimodal psychoeducational interventions demonstrate a notable impact in mitigating adverse emotions, exhaustion, and discomfort experienced by survivors of renal cell carcinoma. Such interventions should be actively promoted in clinical practice.

远程多模式心理教育干预护理计划对肾细胞癌幸存者心理健康和生活质量的影响:一项回顾性研究
背景:接受肾细胞癌手术可能会损害幸存者的心理健康和整体生活质量。通过各种方式进行的长期远程心理教育干预有望提高癌症患者的心理健康水平和生活质量。本研究调查了远程多模式心理教育干预对肾细胞癌幸存者心理健康和生活质量的影响:本研究采用回顾性研究方法,将接受远程心理干预的患者(暴露组)与接受标准护理的患者(对照组)进行比较。干预后,收集并分析了各种数据集,包括一般人口统计学信息、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、简明疲劳量表-中文版(BFI-C)、压力温度计(DT)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷-核心 30(EORTC QLQ-C30)的评估结果:这项研究包括116名肾细胞癌幸存者,其中暴露组52人,对照组64人。两组的基线特征无明显差异(P > 0.05)。干预后,暴露组的 HAMA(14.63 对 16.66,P<0.001)、HAMD(13.63 对 16.36,P<0.001)、BFI-C(52.31 对 57.65,P<0.001)和 DT(3.94 对 4.98,P<0.001)得分明显低于对照组。此外,暴露组的 EORTC QLQ-C30 总分(69.22 vs. 65.59,p < 0.001)明显高于对照组:远程多模式心理教育干预在减轻肾细胞癌幸存者的不良情绪、疲惫和不适方面具有显著效果。此类干预措施应在临床实践中积极推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信