Caregiver training improves child feeding behaviours in children with paediatric feeding disorder and may reduce caregiver stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Megan Madonna, Elodie Jeffers, Katherine E Harding
{"title":"Caregiver training improves child feeding behaviours in children with paediatric feeding disorder and may reduce caregiver stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Megan Madonna, Elodie Jeffers, Katherine E Harding","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2024.2381459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the evidence from randomised controlled trials for caregiver training on child and family outcomes for children with paediatric feeding disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and EMBASE were conducted using the key concepts of paediatrics, feeding disorders, parents/caregivers, and training. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials published in peer-reviewed articles, testing the impact of caregiver training on outcomes for children with paediatric feeding disorder.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eight articles met the inclusion criteria, involving 575 participants from three countries. Seven articles were included in the meta-analyses, providing high certainty evidence that caregiver training improves child feeding behaviours and reduces unhelpful caregiver mealtime strategies compared with no intervention. Uncertainty remains in regard to impact on caregiver stress and intervention intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caregiver training is an effective strategy for improving outcomes in children with paediatric feeding disorder. Further research is required to determine the most effective methods of caregiver training, including the intensity of treatment required to attain clinically important benefits for families with different levels of need.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2381459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the evidence from randomised controlled trials for caregiver training on child and family outcomes for children with paediatric feeding disorder.

Method: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and EMBASE were conducted using the key concepts of paediatrics, feeding disorders, parents/caregivers, and training. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials published in peer-reviewed articles, testing the impact of caregiver training on outcomes for children with paediatric feeding disorder.

Result: Eight articles met the inclusion criteria, involving 575 participants from three countries. Seven articles were included in the meta-analyses, providing high certainty evidence that caregiver training improves child feeding behaviours and reduces unhelpful caregiver mealtime strategies compared with no intervention. Uncertainty remains in regard to impact on caregiver stress and intervention intensity.

Conclusion: Caregiver training is an effective strategy for improving outcomes in children with paediatric feeding disorder. Further research is required to determine the most effective methods of caregiver training, including the intensity of treatment required to attain clinically important benefits for families with different levels of need.

护理人员培训可改善儿科喂养障碍儿童的喂养行为,并可减轻护理人员的压力:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统性综述和荟萃分析的目的是对儿科喂养障碍患儿护理人员培训对儿童和家庭影响的随机对照试验的证据进行综合分析:方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统综述。使用儿科、喂养障碍、父母/照顾者和培训等关键概念对 Medline、CINAHL、PsychInfo 和 EMBASE 进行了检索。符合条件的研究包括发表在同行评议文章中的随机对照试验,这些试验检验了护理人员培训对儿科喂养障碍儿童治疗效果的影响:结果:八篇文章符合纳入标准,涉及三个国家的 575 名参与者。7篇文章被纳入荟萃分析,提供了高度确定性的证据,证明与不采取干预措施相比,护理人员培训可改善儿童喂养行为,减少护理人员无益的进餐策略。结论:照护者培训是一项有效的策略:护理人员培训是改善儿科喂养障碍儿童治疗效果的有效策略。还需要进一步研究,以确定最有效的照顾者培训方法,包括为不同需求水平的家庭获得临床上重要的益处所需的治疗强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信