{"title":"Polymyxin B Plus Aerosolized Colistin vs Polymyxin B Alone in Hospital-acquired Pneumonia (\"AEROCOL\" Study): A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Supradip Ghosh","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to extensively drug resistant gram-negative pathogens, can treatment with high-dose colistin aerosolization using specific aerosol delivery protocol, improve clinical outcome in addition to systemic polymyxin-B?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a randomized control trial, invasively ventilated adult ICU patients with HAP in whom clinicians decided to start systemic polypeptide antibiotics, were randomized to receive either intravenous polymyxin-B plus high-dose colistin nebulization (5-MIU 8-hourly) using specific protocol or intravenous polymyxin-B alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was closed early after recruiting 60% of planned patients because of slow rate of recruitment (24 patients in over 30 months). Treatment success (Primary outcome) was nonsignificantly higher in intervention group (63.66 vs 30.77%; <i>p</i> = 0.217). There was higher rate of microbiological cure in intervention group (60 vs 9.09%: <i>p</i> = 0.018). Numerically better secondary outcomes including fever-free days, ventilator- or vasopressor free days at day-7, ICU and hospital mortality also did not reach statistical significance. Two episodes of transient hypoxia were seen during aerosol delivery. However, overall incidences of adverse effects were not different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study could not confirm superiority of high-dose colistin aerosolization plus systemic polymyxin-B strategy over polymyxin-B alone in treating HAP due to extensive drug resistance (XDR) gram-negative pathogens.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Ghosh S. Polymyxin B Plus Aerosolized Colistin vs Polymyxin B Alone in Hospital-acquired Pneumonia (\"AEROCOL\" Study): A Feasibility Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):792-795.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to extensively drug resistant gram-negative pathogens, can treatment with high-dose colistin aerosolization using specific aerosol delivery protocol, improve clinical outcome in addition to systemic polymyxin-B?
Materials and methods: In a randomized control trial, invasively ventilated adult ICU patients with HAP in whom clinicians decided to start systemic polypeptide antibiotics, were randomized to receive either intravenous polymyxin-B plus high-dose colistin nebulization (5-MIU 8-hourly) using specific protocol or intravenous polymyxin-B alone.
Results: The study was closed early after recruiting 60% of planned patients because of slow rate of recruitment (24 patients in over 30 months). Treatment success (Primary outcome) was nonsignificantly higher in intervention group (63.66 vs 30.77%; p = 0.217). There was higher rate of microbiological cure in intervention group (60 vs 9.09%: p = 0.018). Numerically better secondary outcomes including fever-free days, ventilator- or vasopressor free days at day-7, ICU and hospital mortality also did not reach statistical significance. Two episodes of transient hypoxia were seen during aerosol delivery. However, overall incidences of adverse effects were not different between groups.
Conclusion: This study could not confirm superiority of high-dose colistin aerosolization plus systemic polymyxin-B strategy over polymyxin-B alone in treating HAP due to extensive drug resistance (XDR) gram-negative pathogens.
How to cite this article: Ghosh S. Polymyxin B Plus Aerosolized Colistin vs Polymyxin B Alone in Hospital-acquired Pneumonia ("AEROCOL" Study): A Feasibility Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):792-795.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.