Young children's understanding and experience of insight.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Mathilde H Prenevost, Ida B R Nilsen, Evalill Bølstad, Francisco Pons, Paul L Harris, Rolf Reber
{"title":"Young children's understanding and experience of insight.","authors":"Mathilde H Prenevost, Ida B R Nilsen, Evalill Bølstad, Francisco Pons, Paul L Harris, Rolf Reber","doi":"10.1037/dev0001807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An insight is a moment of sudden understanding followed by characteristic feelings of suddenness, positive affect, certainty, and ease, commonly known as an aha experience. Despite evidence from studies with adults that aha experiences benefit learning, little systematic research on children's aha experiences exists. The present study asks how children understand and experience insight. We presented a community sample of 160 children (age: 4-8 years, 47% girls, 51% boys, 2% nonbinary) with an illustrated clues task inspired by the Remote Associate Test, a task commonly used to study insight in adults. In this task, children saw three clues and were asked to find a solution word that was associated with the three clues. Self-reported and observed aha experiences were recorded, along with children's solution accuracy and confidence. Children also answered a set of questions to assess their understanding of aha experiences. We found that although the number of aha experiences remained stable across age, there was a clear developmental increase in the understanding of aha experiences. Children's ability to recognize their own aha experiences as well as their general understanding of the aha concept increased with age. This suggests a lag between the occurrence of children's aha experiences and their understanding of such experiences; children first have aha experiences and later develop an understanding of those experiences. Aha experiences were associated with higher accuracy, but not with higher confidence ratings. Observed aha experiences, but not self-reported aha experiences, predicted increased motivation. Our findings are in line with the literature on metacognitive development and the distinction between the experience and the understanding of emotion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An insight is a moment of sudden understanding followed by characteristic feelings of suddenness, positive affect, certainty, and ease, commonly known as an aha experience. Despite evidence from studies with adults that aha experiences benefit learning, little systematic research on children's aha experiences exists. The present study asks how children understand and experience insight. We presented a community sample of 160 children (age: 4-8 years, 47% girls, 51% boys, 2% nonbinary) with an illustrated clues task inspired by the Remote Associate Test, a task commonly used to study insight in adults. In this task, children saw three clues and were asked to find a solution word that was associated with the three clues. Self-reported and observed aha experiences were recorded, along with children's solution accuracy and confidence. Children also answered a set of questions to assess their understanding of aha experiences. We found that although the number of aha experiences remained stable across age, there was a clear developmental increase in the understanding of aha experiences. Children's ability to recognize their own aha experiences as well as their general understanding of the aha concept increased with age. This suggests a lag between the occurrence of children's aha experiences and their understanding of such experiences; children first have aha experiences and later develop an understanding of those experiences. Aha experiences were associated with higher accuracy, but not with higher confidence ratings. Observed aha experiences, but not self-reported aha experiences, predicted increased motivation. Our findings are in line with the literature on metacognitive development and the distinction between the experience and the understanding of emotion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

幼儿对洞察力的理解和体验。
所谓 "洞察力",是指突然明白事理的一瞬间,随之而来的是突如其来的、积极的、确定的和轻松的感觉,通常被称为 "啊哈体验"。尽管对成人的研究表明,"啊哈 "体验有益于学习,但对儿童 "啊哈 "体验的系统研究却很少。本研究询问儿童如何理解和体验洞察力。我们在一个由 160 名儿童(年龄:4-8 岁,47% 为女孩,51% 为男孩,2% 为非二元)组成的社区样本中开展了一项插图线索任务,该任务的灵感来源于 "远程联想测试"(Remote Associate Test),这是一项常用于研究成人洞察力的任务。在这项任务中,孩子们看到三条线索,并被要求找出与这三条线索相关联的解词。在记录儿童自我报告和观察到的 "啊哈 "体验的同时,还记录了他们解决问题的准确性和自信心。孩子们还回答了一组问题,以评估他们对 "啊哈 "体验的理解。我们发现,虽然 "啊哈 "体验的数量在不同年龄段保持稳定,但对 "啊哈 "体验的理解却明显随着年龄的增长而增加。随着年龄的增长,儿童识别自己 "啊哈 "体验的能力以及对 "啊哈 "概念的总体理解能力也在提高。这表明,儿童的 "啊哈 "体验的出现与他们对这种体验的理解之间存在着一定的滞后性;儿童先有 "啊哈 "体验,然后才会对这些体验产生理解。"啊哈 "体验与较高的准确度有关,但与较高的信心评级无关。观察到的 "啊哈 "体验(而非自我报告的 "啊哈 "体验)可预测动机的增强。我们的研究结果与元认知发展方面的文献以及情感体验和理解之间的区别是一致的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信