Development of spatial memory consolidation: A comparison between children and adults.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Developmental Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1037/dev0001799
Patrizia M Maier, Iryna Schommartz, Deetje Iggena, Carsten Finke, Christoph J Ploner, Yee Lee Shing
{"title":"Development of spatial memory consolidation: A comparison between children and adults.","authors":"Patrizia M Maier, Iryna Schommartz, Deetje Iggena, Carsten Finke, Christoph J Ploner, Yee Lee Shing","doi":"10.1037/dev0001799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful navigation to spatial locations relies on lasting memories from previous experiences. Spatial navigation undergoes profound maturational changes during childhood. It is unclear how well children can consolidate navigation-based spatial memories and if age-related variations in navigation during training predict spatial memory. The present study examined the immediate and long-delay (after a 2-week period) consolidation of navigation-based spatial memories in 6- to 8-year-old children (n = 33, 18 female/15 male, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 7.61, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 0.71), 9- to 11-year-old children (<i>n</i> = 32, 13 female/19 male, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.90, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 0.59), and 20- to 30-year-old adults (<i>n</i> = 31, 15 female/16 male, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.71, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 2.87). Our results showed that, with age, participants navigated more efficiently during training and formed better immediate spatial memories. Long-delay spatial memory retention after 2 weeks was comparable between children and adults, indicating robust consolidation even in children. Interestingly, while children successfully distinguished between perceptually detailed landmarks after 2 weeks, their abstract knowledge of spatial boundaries and cognitive map of landmark relations was poor. Developmental trajectories were similar for egocentric and allocentric spatial memory. Age-related variations in initial navigation were predictive of spatial memory, that is, children with a more mature initial navigation were more likely to find and remember spatial locations immediately and after a 2-week delay. Taken together, our results show an overall robust spatial memory consolidation in mid and late childhood that can be predicted by initial navigation behavior, coupled with nuanced age differences in the recall of spatial boundaries and cognitive maps. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"761-776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful navigation to spatial locations relies on lasting memories from previous experiences. Spatial navigation undergoes profound maturational changes during childhood. It is unclear how well children can consolidate navigation-based spatial memories and if age-related variations in navigation during training predict spatial memory. The present study examined the immediate and long-delay (after a 2-week period) consolidation of navigation-based spatial memories in 6- to 8-year-old children (n = 33, 18 female/15 male, Mage = 7.61, SDage = 0.71), 9- to 11-year-old children (n = 32, 13 female/19 male, Mage = 9.90, SDage = 0.59), and 20- to 30-year-old adults (n = 31, 15 female/16 male, Mage = 23.71, SDage = 2.87). Our results showed that, with age, participants navigated more efficiently during training and formed better immediate spatial memories. Long-delay spatial memory retention after 2 weeks was comparable between children and adults, indicating robust consolidation even in children. Interestingly, while children successfully distinguished between perceptually detailed landmarks after 2 weeks, their abstract knowledge of spatial boundaries and cognitive map of landmark relations was poor. Developmental trajectories were similar for egocentric and allocentric spatial memory. Age-related variations in initial navigation were predictive of spatial memory, that is, children with a more mature initial navigation were more likely to find and remember spatial locations immediately and after a 2-week delay. Taken together, our results show an overall robust spatial memory consolidation in mid and late childhood that can be predicted by initial navigation behavior, coupled with nuanced age differences in the recall of spatial boundaries and cognitive maps. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

空间记忆巩固的发展:儿童与成人的比较
对空间位置的成功导航依赖于对以往经验的持久记忆。空间导航在儿童时期经历了深刻的成熟变化。目前还不清楚儿童能在多大程度上巩固以导航为基础的空间记忆,也不清楚在训练过程中与年龄相关的导航变化是否能预测空间记忆。本研究考察了 6 至 8 岁儿童(n = 33,18 名女性/15 名男性,Mage = 7.61,SDage = 0.71)、9 至 11 岁儿童(n = 32,13 名女性/19 名男性,Mage = 9.90,SDage = 0.59)和 20 至 30 岁成年人(n = 31,15 名女性/16 名男性,Mage = 23.71,SDage = 2.87)基于导航的空间记忆的即时巩固和长延时(2 周后)巩固情况。我们的结果表明,随着年龄的增长,参与者在训练中的导航效率更高,形成的即时空间记忆也更好。两周后,儿童和成人的长延时空间记忆保持率相当,这表明即使是儿童也能很好地巩固空间记忆。有趣的是,虽然儿童在两周后能成功区分感知上详细的地标,但他们对空间边界的抽象知识和地标关系的认知图谱却很差。以自我为中心的空间记忆和以分配为中心的空间记忆的发展轨迹相似。与年龄相关的初始导航变化对空间记忆有预测作用,即初始导航更成熟的儿童更有可能立即找到并记住空间位置,延迟两周后也是如此。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,儿童中期和晚期的整体空间记忆巩固能力很强,这可以通过初始导航行为以及在回忆空间边界和认知地图方面的细微年龄差异来预测。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信