Community partnership approaches to safe sleep (CPASS) program evaluation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gina S Lowell, Jillian Sanford, Linda Radecki, Allison Hanes, Bonnie Kozial, Felicia Clark, Jennifer McCain, Asim Abbasi, Sevilay Dalabih, Benjamin D Hoffman, Lois K Lee
{"title":"Community partnership approaches to safe sleep (CPASS) program evaluation.","authors":"Gina S Lowell, Jillian Sanford, Linda Radecki, Allison Hanes, Bonnie Kozial, Felicia Clark, Jennifer McCain, Asim Abbasi, Sevilay Dalabih, Benjamin D Hoffman, Lois K Lee","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00528-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) continues to be a leading cause of death in infants in the United States (US), with significant disparities by race and socio-economic status. Infant safe sleep behaviors are associated with decreasing SUID risk, but challenges remain for families to practice these routinely. The objective of this program was to implement and evaluate a novel approach for an infant safe sleep pilot program built upon partnerships between hospitals and community-based organizations (CBOs) serving pregnant and parenting families in at-risk communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community Partnership Approaches to Safe Sleep (CPASS) was a prospectively implemented infant safe sleep program. CPASS included children's hospitals partnered with CBOs across five US cities: Portland, OR, Little Rock AR, Chicago, IL, Birmingham, AL, and Rochester, NY. The program consisted of (1) monthly learning community calls; (2) distribution of Safe Sleep Survival Kits; and (3) surveys of sites and families regarding program outcomes. Survey measures included (1) site participation in CPASS activities; (2) recipients' use of Safe Sleep Kits; and (3) recipients' safe sleep knowledge and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPASS learning community activities were consistently attended by at least two representatives (1 hospital-based, 1 CBO-based) from each site. Across the five sites, 1002 safe kits were distributed over 9 months, the majority (> 85%) to families with infants ≤ 1 month old. Among participating families, 45% reported no safe sleep location before receipt of the kit. Family adherence to nighttime safe sleep recommendations included: (1) no bedsharing (M 6.0, SD 1.8, range 0-7); (2) sleep on back (M 6.3, SD 1.7, range 0-7); and (3) sleep in a crib with no blankets/toys (M 6.0, SD 2.0, range 0-7). Site interviews described how participation in CPASS influenced safe sleep conversations and incorporated local data into counseling. Hospital-CBO relationships were strengthened with program participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CPASS pilot program provides a new, innovative model built on hospital-community partnerships for infant safe sleep promotion in SUID-impacted communities. CPASS reached families before their infant's peak age risk for SUID and empowered families with knowledge and resources to practice infant safe sleep. Important lessons learned included improved ways to center and communicate with families.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00528-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) continues to be a leading cause of death in infants in the United States (US), with significant disparities by race and socio-economic status. Infant safe sleep behaviors are associated with decreasing SUID risk, but challenges remain for families to practice these routinely. The objective of this program was to implement and evaluate a novel approach for an infant safe sleep pilot program built upon partnerships between hospitals and community-based organizations (CBOs) serving pregnant and parenting families in at-risk communities.

Methods: Community Partnership Approaches to Safe Sleep (CPASS) was a prospectively implemented infant safe sleep program. CPASS included children's hospitals partnered with CBOs across five US cities: Portland, OR, Little Rock AR, Chicago, IL, Birmingham, AL, and Rochester, NY. The program consisted of (1) monthly learning community calls; (2) distribution of Safe Sleep Survival Kits; and (3) surveys of sites and families regarding program outcomes. Survey measures included (1) site participation in CPASS activities; (2) recipients' use of Safe Sleep Kits; and (3) recipients' safe sleep knowledge and behaviors.

Results: CPASS learning community activities were consistently attended by at least two representatives (1 hospital-based, 1 CBO-based) from each site. Across the five sites, 1002 safe kits were distributed over 9 months, the majority (> 85%) to families with infants ≤ 1 month old. Among participating families, 45% reported no safe sleep location before receipt of the kit. Family adherence to nighttime safe sleep recommendations included: (1) no bedsharing (M 6.0, SD 1.8, range 0-7); (2) sleep on back (M 6.3, SD 1.7, range 0-7); and (3) sleep in a crib with no blankets/toys (M 6.0, SD 2.0, range 0-7). Site interviews described how participation in CPASS influenced safe sleep conversations and incorporated local data into counseling. Hospital-CBO relationships were strengthened with program participation.

Conclusions: The CPASS pilot program provides a new, innovative model built on hospital-community partnerships for infant safe sleep promotion in SUID-impacted communities. CPASS reached families before their infant's peak age risk for SUID and empowered families with knowledge and resources to practice infant safe sleep. Important lessons learned included improved ways to center and communicate with families.

安全睡眠社区合作方法(CPASS)计划评估。
背景:在美国,婴儿意外猝死(SUID)仍然是婴儿死亡的主要原因,不同种族和社会经济地位的婴儿猝死人数差异很大。婴儿安全睡眠行为与降低婴儿意外猝死风险有关,但家庭在日常实践中仍面临挑战。该项目旨在通过医院与社区组织(CBOs)之间的合作,为高危社区的孕妇和育儿家庭实施婴儿安全睡眠试点项目,并对该项目进行评估:安全睡眠社区合作方法(CPASS)是一项前瞻性实施的婴儿安全睡眠计划。CPASS 包括与美国五个城市的 CBO 合作的儿童医院:这五个城市分别是俄勒冈州波特兰市、亚美尼亚州小石城市、伊利诺伊州芝加哥市、阿拉巴马州伯明翰市和纽约州罗切斯特市。该计划包括:(1)每月一次的学习社区电话会议;(2)发放安全睡眠生存工具包;(3)就计划成果对医院和家庭进行调查。调查措施包括:(1)现场对 CPASS 活动的参与情况;(2)受助者对安全睡眠包的使用情况;以及(3)受助者的安全睡眠知识和行为:每个地点至少有两名代表(一名来自医院,一名来自社区组织)参加了 CPASS 学习社区活动。在 9 个月的时间里,五个地点共发放了 1002 套安全套件,其中大部分(> 85%)发放给了婴儿年龄小于 1 个月的家庭。在参与活动的家庭中,有 45% 的家庭表示在领取安全睡袋前没有找到安全睡眠地点。遵守夜间安全睡眠建议的家庭包括(1) 不同床共枕(中位数 6.0,标数 1.8,范围 0-7);(2) 仰睡(中位数 6.3,标数 1.7,范围 0-7);(3) 睡在没有毯子/玩具的婴儿床上(中位数 6.0,标数 2.0,范围 0-7)。现场访谈描述了参与 CPASS 如何影响安全睡眠对话,并将当地数据纳入咨询。通过参与该计划,医院与社区组织的关系得到了加强:CPASS 试点项目提供了一种新的创新模式,它建立在医院与社区的合作基础上,在受 SUID 影响的社区推广婴儿安全睡眠。CPASS 在婴儿罹患 SUID 的高峰风险年龄之前就接触到了这些家庭,并为这些家庭提供了实践婴儿安全睡眠的知识和资源。获得的重要经验包括改进了以家庭为中心和与家庭沟通的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信