Enhancing Prostate Cancer Detection in PI-RADS 3 Cases: An In-depth Analysis of Radiological Indicators from Multiparametric MRI.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
İlker Mersinlioğlu, Ayse Keven, Zülbiye Eda Tezel, Ahmet Faruk Gürbüz, Metin Çubuk
{"title":"Enhancing Prostate Cancer Detection in PI-RADS 3 Cases: An In-depth Analysis of Radiological Indicators from Multiparametric MRI.","authors":"İlker Mersinlioğlu, Ayse Keven, Zülbiye Eda Tezel, Ahmet Faruk Gürbüz, Metin Çubuk","doi":"10.1055/a-2374-2531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) remains challenging, especially in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 (PI-RADS 3) lesions, which present an intermediate risk of malignancy. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of various radiological parameters in PI-RADS 3 lesions to improve the decision-making process for prostate biopsies.This retrospective study included 76 patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who underwent mpMRI and transrectal prostate biopsy at a tertiary university hospital between 2015 and 2022. Radiological parameters such as signal intensity, lesion size, border definition, morphological features, lesion location, and prostate volume were analyzed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the patients' clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and histopathological findings were also evaluated. Results: Among the 76 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, prostate cancer was detected in 17, with only one case being clinically significant (csPCa). Factors increasing malignancy risk in PI-RADS 3 lesions included poorly defined lesion borders, ADC values below 1180 μm²/sec, and prostate volume below 50.5 cc. The study highlighted the need for additional radiological and clinical parameters in the risk classification of PI-RADS 3 cases.This retrospective study included 76 patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who underwent mpMRI and transrectal prostate biopsy at a tertiary university hospital between 2015 and 2022. Radiological parameters such as signal intensity, lesion size, border definition, morphological features, lesion location, and prostate volume were analyzed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the patients' clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and histopathological findings were also evaluated.Among the 76 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, prostate cancer was detected in 17, with only one case being clinically significant (csPCa). Factors increasing malignancy risk in PI-RADS 3 lesions included poorly defined lesion borders, ADC values below 1180 μm²/sec, and prostate volume below 50.5 cc. The study highlighted the need for additional radiological and clinical parameters in the risk classification of PI-RADS 3 cases.The findings suggest that incorporating additional radiological parameters into the evaluation of PI-RADS 3 lesions can enhance the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis. This approach could minimize unnecessary biopsies and ensure that significant malignancies are not overlooked. Future multicenter, large-scale studies are recommended to establish more definitive risk stratification criteria. · The study emphasizes the complexity of diagnosing prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions and the importance of detailed radiological assessment.. · It highlights the significance of specific radiological parameters, including lesion border definition and ADC values, in predicting malignancy.. · The research provides valuable insight for clinicians in order to make informed decisions regarding prostate biopsies, particularly in ambiguous PI-RADS 3 cases.. · Mersinlioğlu İ, Keven A, Tezel ZE et al. Enhancing Prostate Cancer Detection in PI-RADS 3 Cases: An In-depth Analysis of Radiological Indicators from Multiparametric MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2374-2531.</p>","PeriodicalId":21490,"journal":{"name":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2374-2531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) remains challenging, especially in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 (PI-RADS 3) lesions, which present an intermediate risk of malignancy. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of various radiological parameters in PI-RADS 3 lesions to improve the decision-making process for prostate biopsies.This retrospective study included 76 patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who underwent mpMRI and transrectal prostate biopsy at a tertiary university hospital between 2015 and 2022. Radiological parameters such as signal intensity, lesion size, border definition, morphological features, lesion location, and prostate volume were analyzed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the patients' clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and histopathological findings were also evaluated. Results: Among the 76 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, prostate cancer was detected in 17, with only one case being clinically significant (csPCa). Factors increasing malignancy risk in PI-RADS 3 lesions included poorly defined lesion borders, ADC values below 1180 μm²/sec, and prostate volume below 50.5 cc. The study highlighted the need for additional radiological and clinical parameters in the risk classification of PI-RADS 3 cases.This retrospective study included 76 patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who underwent mpMRI and transrectal prostate biopsy at a tertiary university hospital between 2015 and 2022. Radiological parameters such as signal intensity, lesion size, border definition, morphological features, lesion location, and prostate volume were analyzed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the patients' clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and histopathological findings were also evaluated.Among the 76 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, prostate cancer was detected in 17, with only one case being clinically significant (csPCa). Factors increasing malignancy risk in PI-RADS 3 lesions included poorly defined lesion borders, ADC values below 1180 μm²/sec, and prostate volume below 50.5 cc. The study highlighted the need for additional radiological and clinical parameters in the risk classification of PI-RADS 3 cases.The findings suggest that incorporating additional radiological parameters into the evaluation of PI-RADS 3 lesions can enhance the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis. This approach could minimize unnecessary biopsies and ensure that significant malignancies are not overlooked. Future multicenter, large-scale studies are recommended to establish more definitive risk stratification criteria. · The study emphasizes the complexity of diagnosing prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions and the importance of detailed radiological assessment.. · It highlights the significance of specific radiological parameters, including lesion border definition and ADC values, in predicting malignancy.. · The research provides valuable insight for clinicians in order to make informed decisions regarding prostate biopsies, particularly in ambiguous PI-RADS 3 cases.. · Mersinlioğlu İ, Keven A, Tezel ZE et al. Enhancing Prostate Cancer Detection in PI-RADS 3 Cases: An In-depth Analysis of Radiological Indicators from Multiparametric MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2374-2531.

加强 PI-RADS 3 病例中的前列腺癌检测:深入分析多参数磁共振成像的放射学指标
使用多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)诊断前列腺癌(PCa)仍然具有挑战性,尤其是前列腺成像报告和数据系统3(PI-RADS 3)病变,因为这种病变具有中等恶性风险。本研究旨在评估各种放射学参数对PI-RADS 3病变的诊断效果,以改进前列腺活检的决策过程。这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2022年间在一家三级甲等大学医院接受mpMRI和经直肠前列腺活检的76例PI-RADS 3病变患者。对信号强度、病灶大小、边界定义、形态特征、病灶位置和前列腺体积等放射学参数进行了分析。此外,还评估了表观弥散系数(ADC)值和患者的临床数据,包括年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和组织病理学结果。结果在符合纳入标准的 76 例患者中,有 17 例发现了前列腺癌,其中只有一例具有临床意义(csPCa)。增加 PI-RADS 3 病变恶性风险的因素包括病变边界不清晰、ADC 值低于 1180 μm²/sec,以及前列腺体积低于 50.5 cc。这项回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年至 2022 年期间在一家三级大学医院接受 mpMRI 和经直肠前列腺活检的 76 例 PI-RADS 3 病变患者。对信号强度、病灶大小、边界定义、形态特征、病灶位置和前列腺体积等放射学参数进行了分析。在符合纳入标准的76名患者中,有17名患者被检测出前列腺癌,其中只有1例具有临床意义(csPCa)。增加 PI-RADS 3 病变恶性风险的因素包括病变边界不清晰、ADC 值低于 1180 μm²/sec、前列腺体积低于 50.5 cc。研究结果表明,在评估 PI-RADS 3 病变时加入其他放射学参数可提高前列腺癌诊断的准确性。这种方法可以最大限度地减少不必要的活组织检查,确保重大恶性肿瘤不被忽视。建议今后开展多中心、大规模研究,以建立更明确的风险分层标准。- 该研究强调了诊断 PI-RADS 3 病变中前列腺癌的复杂性以及详细放射学评估的重要性。- 该研究强调了特定放射学参数(包括病变边界定义和ADC值)在预测恶性程度方面的重要性。- 这项研究为临床医生就前列腺活检,尤其是PI-RADS 3模棱两可的病例做出明智决定提供了宝贵的见解。- Mersinlioğlu İ, Keven A, Tezel ZE et al:多参数磁共振成像放射学指标的深入分析》。Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2374-2531.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: Die RöFo veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsartikel und Fallberichte aus dem Bereich der Radiologie und den weiteren bildgebenden Verfahren in der Medizin. Es dürfen nur Arbeiten eingereicht werden, die noch nicht veröffentlicht sind und die auch nicht gleichzeitig einer anderen Zeitschrift zur Veröffentlichung angeboten wurden. Alle eingereichten Beiträge unterliegen einer sorgfältigen fachlichen Begutachtung. Gegründet 1896 – nur knapp 1 Jahr nach der Entdeckung der Röntgenstrahlen durch C.W. Röntgen – blickt die RöFo auf über 100 Jahre Erfahrung als wichtigstes Publikationsmedium in der deutschsprachigen Radiologie zurück. Sie ist damit die älteste radiologische Fachzeitschrift und schafft es erfolgreich, lange Kontinuität mit dem Anspruch an wissenschaftliches Publizieren auf internationalem Niveau zu verbinden. Durch ihren zentralen Platz im Verlagsprogramm stellte die RöFo die Basis für das heute umfassende und erfolgreiche Radiologie-Medienangebot im Georg Thieme Verlag. Besonders eng verbunden ist die RöFo mit der Geschichte der Röntgengesellschaften in Deutschland und Österreich. Sie ist offizielles Organ von DRG und ÖRG und die Mitglieder der Fachgesellschaften erhalten die Zeitschrift im Rahmen ihrer Mitgliedschaft. Mit ihrem wissenschaftlichen Kernteil und dem eigenen Mitteilungsteil der Fachgesellschaften bietet die RöFo Monat für Monat ein Forum für den Austausch von Inhalten und Botschaften der radiologischen Community im deutschsprachigen Raum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信