Comparison of oral versus intravenous antimicrobial therapy for patients who were diagnosed with bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacilli after discharge from the emergency department: A retrospective analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kohei Hasegawa, Asako Doi, Kentaro Iwata
{"title":"Comparison of oral versus intravenous antimicrobial therapy for patients who were diagnosed with bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacilli after discharge from the emergency department: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Kohei Hasegawa, Asako Doi, Kentaro Iwata","doi":"10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in the emergency department (ED) are common, and the blood cultures taken at the visit can turn positive often after the discharge. However, the differences in the clinical outcomes depending on the subsequent decision-making, either to giving the patients intravenous or oral antibiotics remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted for the outcome of the patients whose blood cultures at the visit turned positive and detected GNB. The primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality from the first positive blood cultures, comparing intravenous treatment (IVT) and oral treatment (OT). The propensity score analysis was used to adjust potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 283 patients with GNB bloodstream infections (BSIs) diagnosed after ED discharge. No death occurred in either group within 30 days, with the average treatment effect (ATE) of OT being <0.001 (p = 0.45) after inverse probability weighting (IPW). At 90 days, mortality was 2.5 % for the OT group and 0 % for the IVT group (ATE 0.051; 96%CI 0.013-0.098; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All of patients treated with oral antibiotics were alive at 30 days, but had a higher 90-day mortality compared to those given intravenous agents. The results were consistent after adjusting the potential confounders by using IPW. Given the overall low mortality in both groups after 90 days, even though oral antibiotic therapy was associated with higher mortality statistically, one might consider this as an option especially when the patient's preference was compelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":16103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in the emergency department (ED) are common, and the blood cultures taken at the visit can turn positive often after the discharge. However, the differences in the clinical outcomes depending on the subsequent decision-making, either to giving the patients intravenous or oral antibiotics remain unknown.

Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted for the outcome of the patients whose blood cultures at the visit turned positive and detected GNB. The primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality from the first positive blood cultures, comparing intravenous treatment (IVT) and oral treatment (OT). The propensity score analysis was used to adjust potential confounders.

Results: A total of 283 patients with GNB bloodstream infections (BSIs) diagnosed after ED discharge. No death occurred in either group within 30 days, with the average treatment effect (ATE) of OT being <0.001 (p = 0.45) after inverse probability weighting (IPW). At 90 days, mortality was 2.5 % for the OT group and 0 % for the IVT group (ATE 0.051; 96%CI 0.013-0.098; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: All of patients treated with oral antibiotics were alive at 30 days, but had a higher 90-day mortality compared to those given intravenous agents. The results were consistent after adjusting the potential confounders by using IPW. Given the overall low mortality in both groups after 90 days, even though oral antibiotic therapy was associated with higher mortality statistically, one might consider this as an option especially when the patient's preference was compelling.

对急诊科出院后确诊为革兰氏阴性杆菌所致血流感染的患者进行口服与静脉注射抗菌治疗的比较:回顾性分析。
导言:由革兰阴性杆菌(GNB)引起的感染在急诊科(ED)很常见,就诊时进行的血液培养往往在出院后转为阳性。然而,临床结果的差异取决于随后给患者静脉注射或口服抗生素的决策,这一点仍不得而知:方法: 对就诊时血培养呈阳性并检测出 GNB 的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性观察研究。主要结果是首次血培养阳性后 30 天和 90 天的全因死亡率,比较静脉治疗(IVT)和口服治疗(OT)。采用倾向评分分析法调整潜在的混杂因素:共有 283 名患者在急诊室出院后确诊为 GNB 血流感染 (BSI)。两组患者均未在30天内死亡,OT的平均治疗效果(ATE)为结论:所有接受口服抗生素治疗的患者在 30 天内均存活,但与静脉注射抗生素的患者相比,90 天内的死亡率较高。使用 IPW 调整潜在混杂因素后,结果一致。鉴于两组患者在 90 天后的死亡率都很低,即使口服抗生素治疗在统计学上与较高的死亡率相关,人们仍可考虑将其作为一种选择,尤其是在患者有强烈意愿的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (JIC) — official journal of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases — welcomes original papers, laboratory or clinical, as well as case reports, notes, committee reports, surveillance and guidelines from all parts of the world on all aspects of chemotherapy, covering the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control of infection, including treatment with anticancer drugs. Experimental studies on animal models and pharmacokinetics, and reports on epidemiology and clinical trials are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信