Updates in non-neoplastic orthopaedic pathology: what you don't know can hurt you!

Abstract

Even though the average surgical pathologist reviews far more non-neoplastic orthopaedic pathology on a daily basis, most current research focuses on rare tumours and their even less frequent molecular events. Our experiences among consults and focused conferences strongly suggest that there remains a practice gap regarding knowledge and diagnosing specific non-neoplastic orthopaedic conditions. One of the most frequent intraoperative consultations performed in the USA, among both academic and private institutions, relates to revision arthroplasty and the determination of infection in periprosthetic joints. Pathologists play a critical role in this algorithm, helping determine intraoperatively whether patients require antibiotic spacers prior to reimplantation. Many pathology departments have abandoned the examination of arthroplasty specimens because they (and their surgeons) mistakenly believe there is little clinically relevant information to be gained by thorough pathological examination. However, recent literature has challenged this concept, emphasising the importance of distinguishing avascular necrosis (from osteoarthritis/degenerative joint disease with secondary osteonecrosis), subchondral insufficiency fracture, septic arthritis (from so-called 'sterile' osteomyelitis/pseudoabscesses), underlying crystalline diseases and incidental/occult neoplasia. Histological evaluation of historically insignificant orthopaedic specimens, such as tenosynovium from carpal tunnel syndrome/trigger finger, is now seen as valuable in early diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Not infrequently, orthopaedic conditions like haemosiderotic synovitis, osteocartilaginous loose bodies or rheumatoid nodules, may histologically mimic bona fide neoplasms, notably diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumour, synovial chondromatosis and epithelioid sarcoma, respectively. Here is a review of the more common non-neoplastic orthopaedic conditions, those likely to be examined by the practising surgical pathologist, with updates and guidelines for establishing clinically relevant diagnoses.