Developmental trajectories of loneliness in Chinese children: Environmental and personality predictors

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Developmental trajectories of loneliness in Chinese children: Environmental and personality predictors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to identify the developmental trajectories of loneliness in Chinese children and examine the predictive roles of domain-specific environmental factors (i.e., family dysfunction and satisfaction of relatedness needs at school), personality factors (i.e., neuroticism and extraversion), and their interactions in these developmental trajectories.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 702 Chinese children (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 8.95, <em>SD</em> = 0.76; 54.1 % boys) participated in assessments at six time points over three years at six-month intervals. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to estimate trajectory classes for loneliness, followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses exploring associations between these classes and predictors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>GMM analyses identified three distinct trajectories of loneliness: “low-stable” (81.5 %), “moderate-increasing” (9.4 %), and “high-decreasing” (9.1 %). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that family dysfunction and neuroticism served as risk factors for adverse loneliness trajectories, while satisfaction of relatedness needs at school and extraversion acted as protective factors. Furthermore, the interaction between family dysfunction and extraversion indicated that extraversion did not mitigate the adverse effects of high family dysfunction on children's loneliness, emphasizing the vital need to support positive family functioning among all children.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>This study did not incorporate biological variables (e.g., genetics), which are crucial in the evolutionary theory of loneliness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The identification of three distinct trajectory groups of children's loneliness, along with key environmental and personality predictors, suggests that interventions should be tailored to each group's unique characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724014617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to identify the developmental trajectories of loneliness in Chinese children and examine the predictive roles of domain-specific environmental factors (i.e., family dysfunction and satisfaction of relatedness needs at school), personality factors (i.e., neuroticism and extraversion), and their interactions in these developmental trajectories.

Methods

A total of 702 Chinese children (Mage = 8.95, SD = 0.76; 54.1 % boys) participated in assessments at six time points over three years at six-month intervals. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to estimate trajectory classes for loneliness, followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses exploring associations between these classes and predictors.

Results

GMM analyses identified three distinct trajectories of loneliness: “low-stable” (81.5 %), “moderate-increasing” (9.4 %), and “high-decreasing” (9.1 %). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that family dysfunction and neuroticism served as risk factors for adverse loneliness trajectories, while satisfaction of relatedness needs at school and extraversion acted as protective factors. Furthermore, the interaction between family dysfunction and extraversion indicated that extraversion did not mitigate the adverse effects of high family dysfunction on children's loneliness, emphasizing the vital need to support positive family functioning among all children.

Limitations

This study did not incorporate biological variables (e.g., genetics), which are crucial in the evolutionary theory of loneliness.

Conclusions

The identification of three distinct trajectory groups of children's loneliness, along with key environmental and personality predictors, suggests that interventions should be tailored to each group's unique characteristics.

中国儿童孤独感的发展轨迹:环境和人格预测因素
研究背景本研究旨在确定中国儿童孤独感的发展轨迹,并探讨特定领域的环境因素(即家庭功能障碍和学校的亲情需求满足)、人格因素(即神经质和外向性)及其相互作用在这些发展轨迹中的预测作用:共有 702 名中国儿童(年龄 = 8.95,标准差 = 0.76;54.1% 为男孩)参加了三年内六个时间点的评估,评估间隔为六个月。研究采用生长混合模型(GMM)来估计孤独感的轨迹等级,然后进行多元逻辑回归分析,探讨这些等级与预测因素之间的关联:GMM 分析确定了三种不同的孤独轨迹:"低度稳定"(81.5%)、"中度增加"(9.4%)和 "高度减少"(9.1%)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,家庭功能障碍和神经质是导致不良孤独轨迹的风险因素,而在学校满足亲情需求和外向性则是保护因素。此外,家庭功能障碍与外向性之间的交互作用表明,外向性并不能减轻高度家庭功能障碍对儿童孤独感的不利影响,这强调了支持所有儿童积极的家庭功能的极端必要性:局限性:这项研究没有纳入生物变量(如遗传学),而生物变量在孤独感的进化理论中至关重要:结论:研究发现了儿童孤独感的三个不同轨迹群体,以及关键的环境和人格预测因素,这表明干预措施应针对每个群体的独特特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信