The impact of breast cancer radiation therapy exposure on the prevalence of breast arterial calcification.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Seth K Ramin, Jessica Rubino, Judith M Austin-Strohbehn, Thara Ali, Lesley Jarvis, Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander
{"title":"The impact of breast cancer radiation therapy exposure on the prevalence of breast arterial calcification.","authors":"Seth K Ramin, Jessica Rubino, Judith M Austin-Strohbehn, Thara Ali, Lesley Jarvis, Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mammographic breast arterial calcification (BAC) is an emerging imaging biomarker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in women. The purpose of this study was to assess if breast radiation therapy (RT) exposure impacts the screening utility of this imaging biomarker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included women ages 40-75 years who underwent index screening mammography between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. Chart review was performed to extract data on the breast cancer RT exposure and CVD risk factors. Mammograms were reviewed for the presence of BAC. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine breast RT exposure and BAC, with adjustment for age, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, statin medication use, and antihypertensive medication use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1155 women included in this analysis, 222 (19.2%) had mammographic evidence of BAC, 122 (10.6%) had a history of RT exposure, and 39 (32%) women with RT exposure had mammographic BAC. Women with breast RT exposure had higher odds of BAC compared to women without (odds ratio: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.43, 3.28; P-value = .0008). However, this association became non-significant after multivariable adjustment, with the maximally adjusted model demonstrating an odds ratio of 1.52 (95% CI: 0.95, 2.40; P-value = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that breast RT exposure does not impact the prevalence of mammographic BAC. Therefore, it does not affect its utility as an imaging biomarker of CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This is the first observational study addressing the knowledge gap pertaining to the influence of breast RT exposure on BAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1965-1970"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mammographic breast arterial calcification (BAC) is an emerging imaging biomarker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in women. The purpose of this study was to assess if breast radiation therapy (RT) exposure impacts the screening utility of this imaging biomarker.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included women ages 40-75 years who underwent index screening mammography between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. Chart review was performed to extract data on the breast cancer RT exposure and CVD risk factors. Mammograms were reviewed for the presence of BAC. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine breast RT exposure and BAC, with adjustment for age, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, statin medication use, and antihypertensive medication use.

Results: Of the 1155 women included in this analysis, 222 (19.2%) had mammographic evidence of BAC, 122 (10.6%) had a history of RT exposure, and 39 (32%) women with RT exposure had mammographic BAC. Women with breast RT exposure had higher odds of BAC compared to women without (odds ratio: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.43, 3.28; P-value = .0008). However, this association became non-significant after multivariable adjustment, with the maximally adjusted model demonstrating an odds ratio of 1.52 (95% CI: 0.95, 2.40; P-value = .07).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that breast RT exposure does not impact the prevalence of mammographic BAC. Therefore, it does not affect its utility as an imaging biomarker of CVD risk.

Advances in knowledge: This is the first observational study addressing the knowledge gap pertaining to the influence of breast RT exposure on BAC.

乳腺癌放射治疗暴露对乳房动脉钙化患病率的影响
目的:乳腺X线摄影乳腺动脉钙化(BAC)是一种新兴的女性心血管疾病(CVD)风险影像生物标志物。本研究旨在评估乳腺放射治疗(RT)暴露是否会影响该成像生物标志物的筛查效用:这项横断面研究纳入了在 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日期间接受指数乳腺 X 线照相术筛查的 40-75 岁女性。研究人员对病历进行了审查,以提取有关乳腺癌 RT 暴露和心血管疾病风险因素的数据。对乳房 X 线照片进行审查,以确定是否存在 BAC。采用多变量逻辑回归法检测乳腺癌RT暴露和BAC,并对年龄、体重指数、吸烟状况、高血压、2型糖尿病、他汀类药物的使用和降压药物的使用进行调整:在参与分析的1155名妇女中,222人(19.2%)有乳腺X线照片显示BAC,122人(10.6%)有RT暴露史,39人(32%)有RT暴露史的妇女有乳腺X线照片显示BAC。与没有乳腺 RT 暴露的妇女相比,有乳腺 RT 暴露的妇女发生 BAC 的几率更高(OR:2.18,95% CI:1.43,3.28;P 值 = 0.0008)。然而,经过多变量调整后,这种关联变得不显著,最大调整模型显示的几率比为 1.52(95% CI:0.95,2.40;P 值 = 0.07):我们的研究结果表明,乳腺 RT 暴露不会影响乳腺 BAC 的患病率。结论:我们的研究结果表明,乳腺 RT 暴露不会影响乳腺 BAC 的患病率,因此也不会影响其作为成像生物标志物的效用:这是第一项针对乳腺RT暴露对乳腺动脉钙化的影响这一知识空白的观察性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信