The Impact of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior on Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lindong Yuan, Lihai Zhang, Yan Wang, Peige Zhao, Xiang Xie, Dongming Cao
{"title":"The Impact of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior on Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Lindong Yuan, Lihai Zhang, Yan Wang, Peige Zhao, Xiang Xie, Dongming Cao","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine the association between inactive time, leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), and mortality in individuals diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilized a nationally representative sample of patients with COPD from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) survey (n = 1817; weighted population, 23,698,840). Mortality was tracked from the date of interview and examination. LTPA and sedentary time were assessed using a Global Physical Activity Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that only 28% of patients with COPD achieved sufficient LTPA (LTPA ≥150 min/week), while 58% reported no physical activity and 47% sat for over six hours per day. Over a nine-year follow-up period, 501 deaths occurred, with 101 due to heart diseases. Adequate LTPA levels were associated with a decreased risk of mortality from any cause. Moreover, patients who engaged in sufficient LTPA and reduced sitting time had a lower risk of mortality from any cause compared to those who did not engage in sufficient LTPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participating in an adequate amount of LTPA was linked to a reduced risk of death from any cause in patients with COPD. However, irrespective of the extent of the LTPA, there was no significant correlation between sedentary behavior and the risk of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to examine the association between inactive time, leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), and mortality in individuals diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design: This study utilized a nationally representative sample of patients with COPD from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) survey (n = 1817; weighted population, 23,698,840). Mortality was tracked from the date of interview and examination. LTPA and sedentary time were assessed using a Global Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Results: The study found that only 28% of patients with COPD achieved sufficient LTPA (LTPA ≥150 min/week), while 58% reported no physical activity and 47% sat for over six hours per day. Over a nine-year follow-up period, 501 deaths occurred, with 101 due to heart diseases. Adequate LTPA levels were associated with a decreased risk of mortality from any cause. Moreover, patients who engaged in sufficient LTPA and reduced sitting time had a lower risk of mortality from any cause compared to those who did not engage in sufficient LTPA.

Conclusion: Participating in an adequate amount of LTPA was linked to a reduced risk of death from any cause in patients with COPD. However, irrespective of the extent of the LTPA, there was no significant correlation between sedentary behavior and the risk of mortality.

闲暇时间体育活动和久坐行为对慢性阻塞性肺病患者死亡率的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的非活动时间、闲暇时间体力活动(LTPA)与死亡率之间的关系:本研究采用了美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)中具有全国代表性的慢性阻塞性肺病患者样本(n = 1817;加权人口,23,698,840)。从访谈和检查之日起跟踪死亡率。采用全球体力活动调查问卷对LTPA和久坐时间进行评估:研究发现,只有28%的慢性阻塞性肺病患者达到了足够的LTPA(LTPA≥150分钟/周),而58%的患者表示没有进行体力活动,47%的患者每天坐着的时间超过6小时。在9年的随访期间,共有501人死亡,其中101人死于心脏病。充足的LTPA水平与任何原因导致的死亡风险降低有关。此外,与未参加足够的LTPA的患者相比,参加足够的LTPA并减少久坐时间的患者因任何原因死亡的风险都较低:结论:参加适量的LTPA与慢性阻塞性肺病患者因各种原因死亡的风险降低有关。然而,无论参加LTPA的程度如何,久坐行为与死亡风险之间都没有明显的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信