Tunnel-free peroral endoscopic myotomy reduces procedural time and maintains efficacy in Zenker's diverticulum.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0902
Georgios Mavrogenis, Maria Zachou, Ioannis Tsevgas, Konstantinos Markoglou, Dimitrios Zachariadis, Anna Spanomanoli, Marinos Chatzis, Fateh Bazerbachi
{"title":"Tunnel-free peroral endoscopic myotomy reduces procedural time and maintains efficacy in Zenker's diverticulum.","authors":"Georgios Mavrogenis, Maria Zachou, Ioannis Tsevgas, Konstantinos Markoglou, Dimitrios Zachariadis, Anna Spanomanoli, Marinos Chatzis, Fateh Bazerbachi","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) is an effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), but procedural time and safety vary based on technique. Modified Z-POEM approaches incorporating fewer submucosal tunnels may offer advantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared outcomes among 20 patients with ZD undergoing standard Z-POEM (2 tunnels), single-tunnel Z-POEM (ST Z-POEM), or tunnel-free Z-POEM (TF Z-POEM). All procedures included mucosotomy over the septum and deep extension of myotomy into the esophagus (2 cm). Primary endpoints were procedural time, clinical success, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a mean age of 67.3±12.2 years, and 70% presented with respiratory symptoms. Mean procedure times were 45 min (standard Z-POEM), 33 min (ST Z-POEM), and 30 min (TF Z-POEM), with a statistically significant difference between the standard and TF Z-POEM groups (P=0.014). Technical success was 100%, and the mean hospital stay was 1.3±1.3 days. One adverse event (5%) occurred. Clinical success, defined as improvement in dysphagia score (3 to 0.05, P<0.001) and resolution of respiratory symptoms, was achieved in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, modified Z-POEM techniques utilizing single-tunnel or tunnel-free approaches, combined with over-the-septum mucosotomy and deep esophageal myotomy (2 cm), demonstrated feasibility, safety and a significantly shorter procedural time compared to standard Z-POEM. These findings suggest potential benefits for ZD treatment, warranting further investigation in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 5","pages":"509-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) is an effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), but procedural time and safety vary based on technique. Modified Z-POEM approaches incorporating fewer submucosal tunnels may offer advantages.

Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared outcomes among 20 patients with ZD undergoing standard Z-POEM (2 tunnels), single-tunnel Z-POEM (ST Z-POEM), or tunnel-free Z-POEM (TF Z-POEM). All procedures included mucosotomy over the septum and deep extension of myotomy into the esophagus (2 cm). Primary endpoints were procedural time, clinical success, and adverse events.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 67.3±12.2 years, and 70% presented with respiratory symptoms. Mean procedure times were 45 min (standard Z-POEM), 33 min (ST Z-POEM), and 30 min (TF Z-POEM), with a statistically significant difference between the standard and TF Z-POEM groups (P=0.014). Technical success was 100%, and the mean hospital stay was 1.3±1.3 days. One adverse event (5%) occurred. Clinical success, defined as improvement in dysphagia score (3 to 0.05, P<0.001) and resolution of respiratory symptoms, was achieved in all patients.

Conclusions: In this study, modified Z-POEM techniques utilizing single-tunnel or tunnel-free approaches, combined with over-the-septum mucosotomy and deep esophageal myotomy (2 cm), demonstrated feasibility, safety and a significantly shorter procedural time compared to standard Z-POEM. These findings suggest potential benefits for ZD treatment, warranting further investigation in larger prospective studies.

无隧道口腔内窥镜肌切开术缩短了 Zenker 胃憩室的手术时间并保持了疗效。
背景:口周内镜下肌切开术(Z-POEM)是治疗禅克氏憩室(ZD)的有效方法,但手术时间和安全性因技术而异。改良的 Z-POEM 方法结合了更少的粘膜下隧道,可能会带来优势:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们比较了 20 名 ZD 患者接受标准 Z-POEM(2 个隧道)、单隧道 Z-POEM(ST Z-POEM)或无隧道 Z-POEM(TF Z-POEM)手术的结果。所有手术都包括隔膜上的粘膜切开术和深入食管(2 厘米)的肌切开术。主要终点是手术时间、临床成功率和不良事件:患者平均年龄(67.3±12.2)岁,70%有呼吸道症状。平均手术时间为 45 分钟(标准 Z-POEM)、33 分钟(ST Z-POEM)和 30 分钟(TF Z-POEM),标准组和 TF Z-POEM 组之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.014)。技术成功率为 100%,平均住院时间为 1.3±1.3 天。发生了一起不良事件(5%)。临床成功定义为吞咽困难评分的改善(3 至 0.05,PC 结论:在这项研究中,采用单隧道或无隧道方法的改良 Z-POEM 技术,结合隔膜上粘膜切开术和深部食管肌切开术(2 厘米),与标准 Z-POEM 相比,具有可行性、安全性和显著缩短的手术时间。这些研究结果表明了 ZD 治疗的潜在益处,值得在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信