Otolith reliability is context-dependent for estimating warming and CO2 acidification impacts on fish growth

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Bangli Tang, Liuyong Ding, Chengzhi Ding, Dekui He, Haojie Su, Juan Tao
{"title":"Otolith reliability is context-dependent for estimating warming and CO2 acidification impacts on fish growth","authors":"Bangli Tang,&nbsp;Liuyong Ding,&nbsp;Chengzhi Ding,&nbsp;Dekui He,&nbsp;Haojie Su,&nbsp;Juan Tao","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Otoliths are frequently used as proxies to examine the impacts of climate change on fish growth in marine and freshwater ecosystems worldwide. However, the large sensitivity differences in otolith growth responses to typical changing environmental factors (i.e., temperature and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration), coupled with unclear drivers and potential inconsistencies with fish body growth, fundamentally challenge the reliability of such otolith applications. Here, we performed a global meta-analysis of experiments investigating the direct effects of warming (297 cases) and CO<sub>2</sub> acidification (293 cases) on fish otolith growth and compared them with fish body growth responses. Hierarchical models were used to assess the overall effect and quantify the influence of nine explanatory factors (e.g., fish feeding habit, life history stage, habitat type, and experimental amplitude and duration). The overall effects of warming and acidification on otolith growth were positive and significant, and the effect size of warming (effect size = 0.4003, otolith size of the treatment group increased by 49.23% compared to that of the control group) was larger than that of acidification (0.0724, 7.51%). All factors examined contributed to the heterogeneity of effect sizes, with larger responses commonly observed in carnivorous fish, marine species, and young individuals. Warming amplitudes and durations and acidification amplitudes increased the effect sizes, while acidification durations decreased the effect sizes. Otolith growth responses were consistent with, but greater than, fish body growth responses under warming. In contrast, fish body growth responses were not significant under acidification (effect size = −0.0051, <i>p</i> = .6185) and thus cannot be estimated using otoliths. Therefore, our study highlights that the reliability of applying otoliths to examine climate change impacts is likely varied, as the sensitivity of otolith growth responses and the consistency between the growth responses of otoliths and fish bodies are context-dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Otoliths are frequently used as proxies to examine the impacts of climate change on fish growth in marine and freshwater ecosystems worldwide. However, the large sensitivity differences in otolith growth responses to typical changing environmental factors (i.e., temperature and CO2 concentration), coupled with unclear drivers and potential inconsistencies with fish body growth, fundamentally challenge the reliability of such otolith applications. Here, we performed a global meta-analysis of experiments investigating the direct effects of warming (297 cases) and CO2 acidification (293 cases) on fish otolith growth and compared them with fish body growth responses. Hierarchical models were used to assess the overall effect and quantify the influence of nine explanatory factors (e.g., fish feeding habit, life history stage, habitat type, and experimental amplitude and duration). The overall effects of warming and acidification on otolith growth were positive and significant, and the effect size of warming (effect size = 0.4003, otolith size of the treatment group increased by 49.23% compared to that of the control group) was larger than that of acidification (0.0724, 7.51%). All factors examined contributed to the heterogeneity of effect sizes, with larger responses commonly observed in carnivorous fish, marine species, and young individuals. Warming amplitudes and durations and acidification amplitudes increased the effect sizes, while acidification durations decreased the effect sizes. Otolith growth responses were consistent with, but greater than, fish body growth responses under warming. In contrast, fish body growth responses were not significant under acidification (effect size = −0.0051, p = .6185) and thus cannot be estimated using otoliths. Therefore, our study highlights that the reliability of applying otoliths to examine climate change impacts is likely varied, as the sensitivity of otolith growth responses and the consistency between the growth responses of otoliths and fish bodies are context-dependent.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在估计气候变暖和二氧化碳酸化对鱼类生长的影响时,耳石的可靠性取决于具体情况。
耳石经常被用作研究气候变化对全球海洋和淡水生态系统中鱼类生长影响的替代物。然而,耳石生长对典型环境因素(即温度和二氧化碳浓度)变化的敏感性差异很大,加上驱动因素不明确以及与鱼体生长的潜在不一致性,从根本上挑战了耳石应用的可靠性。在此,我们对研究气候变暖(297 例)和二氧化碳酸化(293 例)对鱼耳石生长的直接影响的实验进行了全球荟萃分析,并将其与鱼体生长反应进行了比较。采用层次模型评估总体效应,并量化九个解释因素(如鱼类摄食习惯、生活史阶段、栖息地类型、实验幅度和持续时间)的影响。气候变暖和酸化对耳石生长的总体效应均为正且显著,气候变暖的效应大小(效应大小=0.4003,与对照组相比,处理组耳石体积增加了49.23%)大于酸化的效应大小(0.0724,7.51%)。所有研究因素都导致了效应大小的不一致性,肉食性鱼类、海洋物种和年轻个体的反应通常更大。变暖的幅度和持续时间以及酸化的幅度增加了效应大小,而酸化的持续时间减少了效应大小。耳石的生长反应与变暖条件下鱼体的生长反应一致,但大于鱼体的生长反应。相反,在酸化条件下,鱼体的生长反应并不显著(效应大小 = -0.0051,p = .6185),因此不能使用耳石来估计。因此,我们的研究强调,由于耳石生长反应的敏感性以及耳石和鱼体生长反应之间的一致性取决于具体情况,因此用耳石来研究气候变化影响的可靠性可能存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信