Adaptation to climate change and limits in food production systems: Physics, the chemistry of biology, and human behavior

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Gerald C. Nelson, William W. L. Cheung, Rachel Bezner Kerr, James Franke, Francisco Meza, Muhammed A. Oyinlola, Philip Thornton, Florian Zabel
{"title":"Adaptation to climate change and limits in food production systems: Physics, the chemistry of biology, and human behavior","authors":"Gerald C. Nelson,&nbsp;William W. L. Cheung,&nbsp;Rachel Bezner Kerr,&nbsp;James Franke,&nbsp;Francisco Meza,&nbsp;Muhammed A. Oyinlola,&nbsp;Philip Thornton,&nbsp;Florian Zabel","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue of Global Change Biology grew out of a recognition by the Sixth Assessment of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group 2 (IPCC AR6 WG2) authors of chapter 5 (“Food, fibre, and other ecosystem products”) (Bezner-Kerr et al., 2022) that literature on limits to climate change adaptation in food production was lacking. The IPCC defines limits to adaptation as: “The point at which an actor's objectives (or system needs) cannot be secured from intolerable risks through adaptive actions.” (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022). “Hard” limits to adaptation are when no adaptive actions are possible to avoid intolerable risks. “Soft” limits are when options are currently not available to avert intolerable risks through adaptive action. Few peer-reviewed papers were available that dealt with either soft or hard limits to adaptation in food systems. Furthermore, the literature available for AR6 was almost always based on earlier Earth System Model simulations (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5—CMIP5—and earlier versions) rather than the latest version (CMIP6) that became available during the writing of the IPCC AR6 WG2 report. Comparisons of the CMIP products suggest that projections from Earth system models in CMIP6 are more sensitive to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations than earlier model results. Thus, the impacts of climate change on food production systems from CMIP6 are likely to occur earlier and at a higher rate and intensity than previously expected, with potentially large implications for adaptations and their limits.</p><p>These papers are driven for the most part by scenarios and Earth system model projections from CMIP6 for the 21st century, focusing on the Shared Socio-economic Pathway (SSP) 1–2.6 (a scenario with “strong mitigation”) and SSP5-8.5 (a scenario with “no mitigation”). Collectively, these papers help paint a picture of the potential futures of a range of food production systems in the world under contrasting climate scenarios.</p><p>Different combinations of climate variables are used in each paper to illustrate different mechanisms of potential impact and challenges posed by climate change, as well as potential adaptation options and their limits. The primary climatic drivers affecting food systems differ by location. On land, these drivers include temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration while in the oceans, they encompass warming, deoxygenation, acidification, salinity, and changes in net primary production.</p><p>Table 1 summarizes systems analyzed and the key results in this special issue. It is followed by a more extensive discussion of each paper and a summary section on what has been learned.</p><p>The papers in this special issue cover a range of food production systems, and they discuss how challenging it will be to adapt to climate change, particularly if the most severe climate scenario examined (SSP5-8.5) becomes a reality. Adaptations considered include three types—shifting production to regions where climate changes are less severe, changing the varieties/species grown or harvested, reducing aquatic harvest, and modifying the production/harvest methods and societal changes to address the human dimensions of these changes.</p><p><b>Gerald C. Nelson:</b> Conceptualization; project administration; writing – original draft; Writing – review and editing. <b>William W. L. Cheung:</b> Conceptualization; project administration; writing – original draft. <b>Rachel Bezner Kerr:</b> Writing – original draft. <b>James Franke:</b> Writing – original draft. <b>Francisco Meza:</b> Writing – original draft. <b>Muhammed A. Oyinlola:</b> Writing – original draft. <b>Philip Thornton:</b> Writing – original draft. <b>Florian Zabel:</b> Writing – original draft.</p><p>All authors have indicated they have no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.17489","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue of Global Change Biology grew out of a recognition by the Sixth Assessment of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group 2 (IPCC AR6 WG2) authors of chapter 5 (“Food, fibre, and other ecosystem products”) (Bezner-Kerr et al., 2022) that literature on limits to climate change adaptation in food production was lacking. The IPCC defines limits to adaptation as: “The point at which an actor's objectives (or system needs) cannot be secured from intolerable risks through adaptive actions.” (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022). “Hard” limits to adaptation are when no adaptive actions are possible to avoid intolerable risks. “Soft” limits are when options are currently not available to avert intolerable risks through adaptive action. Few peer-reviewed papers were available that dealt with either soft or hard limits to adaptation in food systems. Furthermore, the literature available for AR6 was almost always based on earlier Earth System Model simulations (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5—CMIP5—and earlier versions) rather than the latest version (CMIP6) that became available during the writing of the IPCC AR6 WG2 report. Comparisons of the CMIP products suggest that projections from Earth system models in CMIP6 are more sensitive to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations than earlier model results. Thus, the impacts of climate change on food production systems from CMIP6 are likely to occur earlier and at a higher rate and intensity than previously expected, with potentially large implications for adaptations and their limits.

These papers are driven for the most part by scenarios and Earth system model projections from CMIP6 for the 21st century, focusing on the Shared Socio-economic Pathway (SSP) 1–2.6 (a scenario with “strong mitigation”) and SSP5-8.5 (a scenario with “no mitigation”). Collectively, these papers help paint a picture of the potential futures of a range of food production systems in the world under contrasting climate scenarios.

Different combinations of climate variables are used in each paper to illustrate different mechanisms of potential impact and challenges posed by climate change, as well as potential adaptation options and their limits. The primary climatic drivers affecting food systems differ by location. On land, these drivers include temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation and CO2 concentration while in the oceans, they encompass warming, deoxygenation, acidification, salinity, and changes in net primary production.

Table 1 summarizes systems analyzed and the key results in this special issue. It is followed by a more extensive discussion of each paper and a summary section on what has been learned.

The papers in this special issue cover a range of food production systems, and they discuss how challenging it will be to adapt to climate change, particularly if the most severe climate scenario examined (SSP5-8.5) becomes a reality. Adaptations considered include three types—shifting production to regions where climate changes are less severe, changing the varieties/species grown or harvested, reducing aquatic harvest, and modifying the production/harvest methods and societal changes to address the human dimensions of these changes.

Gerald C. Nelson: Conceptualization; project administration; writing – original draft; Writing – review and editing. William W. L. Cheung: Conceptualization; project administration; writing – original draft. Rachel Bezner Kerr: Writing – original draft. James Franke: Writing – original draft. Francisco Meza: Writing – original draft. Muhammed A. Oyinlola: Writing – original draft. Philip Thornton: Writing – original draft. Florian Zabel: Writing – original draft.

All authors have indicated they have no conflict of interest.

Abstract Image

适应气候变化和粮食生产系统的限制:物理学、生物化学和人类行为。
政府间气候变化专门委员会第六次评估报告第二工作组(IPCC AR6 WG2)第五章("粮食、纤维和其他生态系统产品")(Bezner-Kerr 等人,2022 年)的作者认为,有关粮食生产适应气候变化的局限性的文献十分匮乏,因此,本期《全球变化生物学》特刊应运而生。IPCC 将适应极限定义为"行为者的目标(或系统需求)无法通过适应行动来确保其免受不可容忍的风险的程度"。(政府间气候变化专门委员会,2022 年)。适应的 "硬 "限制是指不可能采取适应行动来避免不可容忍的风险。软 "限制是指目前没有通过适应行动避免不可容忍风险的选择。很少有同行评审的论文涉及粮食系统适应的软限制或硬限制。此外,为第六次评估报告提供的文献几乎都是基于早期的地球系统模型模拟(耦合模型相互比较项目第5阶段-CMIP5和早期版本),而不是在IPCC第六次评估报告第二工作组报告撰写期间推出的最新版本(CMIP6)。对 CMIP 产品的比较表明,CMIP6 中地球系统模式的预测结果对温室气体(GHG)浓度的敏感性高于早期模式的结果。因此,CMIP6 中的气候变化对粮食生产系统的影响可能会比之前预计的发生得更早、速度更快、强度更大,从而对适应措施及其限制产生潜在的巨大影响。这些论文的主要内容是 CMIP6 对 21 世纪的情景和地球系统模式预测,重点是共享社会经济路径(SSP)1-2.6("强减缓 "情景)和 SSP5-8.5("无减缓 "情景)。每篇论文都使用了不同的气候变量组合,以说明气候变化带来的潜在影响和挑战的不同机制,以及潜在的适应方案及其局限性。影响粮食系统的主要气候驱动因素因地而异。在陆地上,这些驱动因素包括温度、降水、湿度、风速、太阳辐射和二氧化碳浓度,而在海洋中,则包括气候变暖、脱氧、酸化、盐度和净初级生产力的变化。本特刊中的论文涵盖了一系列粮食生产系统,它们讨论了适应气候变化将面临的挑战,尤其是在所研究的最严重气候情景(SSP5-8.5)成为现实的情况下。考虑的适应措施包括三类--将生产转移到气候变化不太严重的地区,改变种植或收获的品种/种类,减少水产收获,以及改变生产/收获方法和社会变革,以应对这些变化对人类的影响:构思;项目管理;写作--原稿;写作--审阅和编辑。William W. L. Cheung:概念化;项目管理;写作--原稿。Rachel Bezner Kerr:写作--原稿。詹姆斯-弗兰科写作--原稿弗朗西斯科-梅萨:写作-原稿。Muhammed A. Oyinlola:写作 - 原稿菲利普-桑顿写作 - 原稿弗洛里安-扎贝尔所有作者均表示没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信