Letter: Association between terlipressin and multidrug-resistant organism rectal colonization: Authors' reply

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Marcus M. Mücke, Wenyi Gu, Javier Fernandez, Jonel Trebicka
{"title":"Letter: Association between terlipressin and multidrug-resistant organism rectal colonization: Authors' reply","authors":"Marcus M. Mücke,&nbsp;Wenyi Gu,&nbsp;Javier Fernandez,&nbsp;Jonel Trebicka","doi":"10.1111/apt.18256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the letter to the editors by Tan et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> discussing our study<span><sup>2</sup></span> and their own findings concerning the impact of terlipressin on colonization of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRO) in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. In our study, apart from the well-known risk factor of antibiotic therapy, terlipressin administered in the previous 14 days was the only independent pharmaceutical agent associated with MDRO colonization. Similarly, Tan et al. observed a significant association of terlipressin therapy with the detection of MDRO colonization in univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis, when considering other risk factors, such as prior detection of (the same) MDRO in the last 365 days before liver transplantation, terlipressin was only borderline significant associated with vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. (HR 2.0, <i>p</i> = 0.06) and not significant with MDR Gram-negative (GN) bacteria (HR 2.2, <i>p</i> = 0.09) colonization. More surprisingly, in the multivariate analysis also the antibiotic therapy was not associated with MDRO colonization. This raises doubts about the selection of the population in this study. Indeed, this was a highly selected patient collective of 594 liver transplant recipients. Being on the waiting list for liver transplant implies that patients had an intensive health care contact (clinical decompensations, diagnostic/therapeutic procedures). By contrast, our data are based in ‘all comers’ in an acute decompensation from a training cohort, validation cohort and international external cohort with in total almost 656 patients.</p><p>We agree with the authors, for patients with advanced liver disease and previous health care exposure such as antibiotic therapy, hospitalization or ICU admission constitute important risk factors to favour MDRO colonization. In our study, these commonly accepted risk factors equally distributed among both the groups with and without terlipressin treatment in all three cohorts. Additionally, we carefully considered all risk factors in our analyses and even matched cohorts according to disease severity and antibiotic therapy as well as other potential confounders while matching was not performed in the cohort of Tan et al.</p><p>In their cohort prior colonization with (the same) MDRO was the strongest independent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Because of that, the authors proposed to focus on patients' history and MDRO risk factors. Indeed, MDRO risk factors, including prior MDRO colonization, were extensively considered in our study and consecutive analyses. Only patients with a new MDRO isolation resulting from rectal MDRO screening were considered as (de novo) colonized patients. Thus, all patients with previous known and similar MDRO were not considered as (de novo) colonized. Accordingly, previous MDRO colonization with the same/a similar MDRO could neither be a confounder nor a risk factor in our analyses.</p><p>Taken together, the data by Tan et al. rather support our findings that terlipressin seems to be associated with MDRO colonization, which is a relevant problem in patients with liver cirrhosis. Multiple risk factors for MDRO acquisition should be considered. Further studies—preferably randomized controlled trials—are necessary to unravel the role and the mutual influence of each of these risk factors, including terlipressin use.</p><p><b>Marcus M. Mücke:</b> Conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Wenyi Gu:</b> Writing – review and editing. <b>Javier Fernandez:</b> Conceptualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing; supervision. <b>Jonel Trebicka:</b> Supervision; conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing.</p><p>Jonel Trebicka was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) project ID 403224013—SFB 1382 (A09), by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for the DEEP-HCC project and by the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts (HMWK) for the ENABLE and ACLF-I cluster projects. The MICROB-PREDICT (project ID 825694), DECISION (project ID 847949), GALAXY (project ID 668031), LIVERHOPE (project ID 731875) and IHMCSA (project ID 964590) projects have received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. The manuscript reflects only the authors' views, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The funders had no influence on study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.</p><p>This article is linked to Mücke et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17899 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18200</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18256","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with great interest the letter to the editors by Tan et al.1 discussing our study2 and their own findings concerning the impact of terlipressin on colonization of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRO) in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. In our study, apart from the well-known risk factor of antibiotic therapy, terlipressin administered in the previous 14 days was the only independent pharmaceutical agent associated with MDRO colonization. Similarly, Tan et al. observed a significant association of terlipressin therapy with the detection of MDRO colonization in univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis, when considering other risk factors, such as prior detection of (the same) MDRO in the last 365 days before liver transplantation, terlipressin was only borderline significant associated with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (HR 2.0, p = 0.06) and not significant with MDR Gram-negative (GN) bacteria (HR 2.2, p = 0.09) colonization. More surprisingly, in the multivariate analysis also the antibiotic therapy was not associated with MDRO colonization. This raises doubts about the selection of the population in this study. Indeed, this was a highly selected patient collective of 594 liver transplant recipients. Being on the waiting list for liver transplant implies that patients had an intensive health care contact (clinical decompensations, diagnostic/therapeutic procedures). By contrast, our data are based in ‘all comers’ in an acute decompensation from a training cohort, validation cohort and international external cohort with in total almost 656 patients.

We agree with the authors, for patients with advanced liver disease and previous health care exposure such as antibiotic therapy, hospitalization or ICU admission constitute important risk factors to favour MDRO colonization. In our study, these commonly accepted risk factors equally distributed among both the groups with and without terlipressin treatment in all three cohorts. Additionally, we carefully considered all risk factors in our analyses and even matched cohorts according to disease severity and antibiotic therapy as well as other potential confounders while matching was not performed in the cohort of Tan et al.

In their cohort prior colonization with (the same) MDRO was the strongest independent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Because of that, the authors proposed to focus on patients' history and MDRO risk factors. Indeed, MDRO risk factors, including prior MDRO colonization, were extensively considered in our study and consecutive analyses. Only patients with a new MDRO isolation resulting from rectal MDRO screening were considered as (de novo) colonized patients. Thus, all patients with previous known and similar MDRO were not considered as (de novo) colonized. Accordingly, previous MDRO colonization with the same/a similar MDRO could neither be a confounder nor a risk factor in our analyses.

Taken together, the data by Tan et al. rather support our findings that terlipressin seems to be associated with MDRO colonization, which is a relevant problem in patients with liver cirrhosis. Multiple risk factors for MDRO acquisition should be considered. Further studies—preferably randomized controlled trials—are necessary to unravel the role and the mutual influence of each of these risk factors, including terlipressin use.

Marcus M. Mücke: Conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Wenyi Gu: Writing – review and editing. Javier Fernandez: Conceptualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing; supervision. Jonel Trebicka: Supervision; conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing.

Jonel Trebicka was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) project ID 403224013—SFB 1382 (A09), by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for the DEEP-HCC project and by the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts (HMWK) for the ENABLE and ACLF-I cluster projects. The MICROB-PREDICT (project ID 825694), DECISION (project ID 847949), GALAXY (project ID 668031), LIVERHOPE (project ID 731875) and IHMCSA (project ID 964590) projects have received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. The manuscript reflects only the authors' views, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The funders had no influence on study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

This article is linked to Mücke et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17899 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18200

信特利加压素与耐多药生物直肠定植之间的关系:作者回复。
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了 Tan 等人1 致编辑的信,信中讨论了我们的研究2 以及他们自己关于特利加压素对肝硬化失代偿期患者耐多药细菌(MDRO)定植的影响的研究结果。在我们的研究中,除了众所周知的抗生素治疗这一风险因素外,在过去 14 天内使用特利加压素是唯一与 MDRO 定植相关的独立药物。同样,Tan 等人在单变量分析中也观察到特利加压素治疗与 MDRO 定植检测有显著关联。然而,在多变量分析中,当考虑到其他风险因素(如肝移植前365天内曾检测到(相同的)MDRO)时,特利加压素与耐万古霉素肠球菌属(HR 2.0,p = 0.06)的相关性仅为边缘显著,而与耐多药革兰氏阴性(GN)菌(HR 2.2,p = 0.09)定植的相关性则不显著。更令人惊讶的是,在多变量分析中,抗生素治疗也与 MDRO 定植无关。这让人对该研究的人群选择产生了怀疑。事实上,这是一个由 594 名肝移植受者组成的高选择性患者群体。列入肝移植候选名单意味着患者有密集的医疗接触(临床失代偿、诊断/治疗过程)。我们同意作者的观点,对于晚期肝病患者和既往接触过抗生素治疗、住院或入住重症监护室等医护人员的患者来说,这些都是有利于MDRO定植的重要风险因素。在我们的研究中,这些普遍接受的风险因素在所有三个队列中接受特利加压素治疗和未接受特利加压素治疗的两组患者中平均分布。此外,我们在分析中仔细考虑了所有风险因素,甚至根据疾病严重程度和抗生素治疗以及其他潜在混杂因素对队列进行了配对,而在 Tan 等人的队列中没有进行配对。因此,作者建议重点关注患者的病史和 MDRO 风险因素。事实上,在我们的研究和连续分析中,MDRO 风险因素,包括之前的 MDRO 定植,都得到了广泛的考虑。只有在直肠MDRO筛查中新分离出MDRO的患者才被视为(新)定植患者。因此,所有曾感染过已知和类似 MDRO 的患者都不被视为(新)定植患者。总之,Tan 等人的数据支持了我们的研究结果,即特利加压素似乎与 MDRO 定植有关,而 MDRO 定植是肝硬化患者的一个相关问题。应考虑MDRO感染的多种风险因素。有必要开展进一步研究--最好是随机对照试验--以揭示这些风险因素(包括特利加压素的使用)各自的作用和相互影响:构思;调查;写作-原稿;写作-审阅和编辑。顾文怡写作--审阅和编辑。哈维尔-费尔南德斯(Javier Fernandez):构思;写作--原稿;写作--审阅和编辑;指导。Jonel Trebicka:指导;构思;调查;写作--原稿;写作--审阅和编辑。Jonel Trebicka得到了德国研究基金会(DFG)项目编号403224013-SFB 1382 (A09)、德国联邦教育和研究部(BMBF)DEEP-HCC项目以及黑森州高等教育、研究和艺术部(HMWK)ENABLE和ACLF-I集群项目的支持。MICROB-PREDICT(项目编号825694)、DECISION(项目编号847949)、GALAXY(项目编号668031)、LIVERHOPE(项目编号731875)和IHMCSA(项目编号964590)项目获得了欧盟地平线2020研究与创新计划的资助。手稿仅反映作者的观点,欧盟委员会不对使用手稿中的任何信息负责。资助方对研究设计、数据收集和分析、发表决定或手稿撰写没有任何影响。本文与 Mücke 等人的论文相关联。要查看这些文章,请访问 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17899 和 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18200。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信