{"title":"Decoupled and unconditionally stable iteration method for stationary Navier–Stokes equations","authors":"Jianhua Chen, Yingying Jiang, Guo-Dong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/fld.5317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is well known the Oseen iteration for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations is unconditionally stable. However, it is a coupled type scheme where the velocity <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>u</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\boldsymbol{u} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and pressure <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ p $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> are coupled together at each iteration. By treating pressure <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ p $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> explicitly would lead to a decoupled iteration, but this treatment is unstable. In this article, we construct a decoupled and unconditionally stable iteration method to solve the stationary Navier–Stokes equations by adopting the pressure projection method to the temporal disturbed Navier–Stokes system whose solution approximates the steady state solution over time (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>t</mi>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ t\\to +\\infty $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). We also rigorously prove its unconditional stability. Numerical simulations demonstrate that our iterative method is more efficient and stable than the extensively used T-S and Oseen iterations, and could solve the fluid flow with high Reynolds number.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 10","pages":"1680-1693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is well known the Oseen iteration for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations is unconditionally stable. However, it is a coupled type scheme where the velocity and pressure are coupled together at each iteration. By treating pressure explicitly would lead to a decoupled iteration, but this treatment is unstable. In this article, we construct a decoupled and unconditionally stable iteration method to solve the stationary Navier–Stokes equations by adopting the pressure projection method to the temporal disturbed Navier–Stokes system whose solution approximates the steady state solution over time (). We also rigorously prove its unconditional stability. Numerical simulations demonstrate that our iterative method is more efficient and stable than the extensively used T-S and Oseen iterations, and could solve the fluid flow with high Reynolds number.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.