Protecting Amazon's Indigenous lands: a multidisciplinary approach

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Celso AG Santos, Carlos AC dos Santos, Helenilza FA Cunha, Alan C da Cunha, Skye Hellenkamp, Richarde M da Silva
{"title":"Protecting Amazon's Indigenous lands: a multidisciplinary approach","authors":"Celso AG Santos,&nbsp;Carlos AC dos Santos,&nbsp;Helenilza FA Cunha,&nbsp;Alan C da Cunha,&nbsp;Skye Hellenkamp,&nbsp;Richarde M da Silva","doi":"10.1002/fee.2796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Within Indigenous territories in the Amazon—particularly in a &gt;5 million square kilometer area collectively known as the Legal Amazon or Amazônia Legal, where more than half of the Brazilian Indigenous population resides—deforestation and wildfires pose major threats to biodiversity and the cultural survival of native peoples (Vieira and da Silva <span>2024</span>). Illegal activities such as logging and mineral extraction, which are often driven by economic interests that disregard the legally guaranteed territorial rights of Indigenous communities, exacerbate these threats and thereby further adversely impact biodiversity and the cultural integrity of native peoples in the region. Environmental degradation not only impairs the traditional lifestyles of these communities but also intensifies global, regional, and local drivers contributing to climate change (Soares-Filho <i>et al</i>. <span>2010</span>; Estrada <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Climate extremes in the Amazon have amplified in frequency and intensity, and the risks to Indigenous populations and environments have concurrently expanded. Given this complex picture of dynamic physical changes interacting with diverse social dimensions over time, forecasting the potentially exacerbated risk of climate-related disasters becomes an important scientific challenge (Antunes <i>et al</i>. <span>2016</span>; de Souza <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>). The region's vulnerability to extreme climatic conditions and human disturbances, such as deforestation and wildfires, remains poorly understood despite increased research efforts. This knowledge gap presents substantial risks, compounded by hydrological stress that disrupts plant physiological processes and regional climate dynamics. Of the wildfires that impacted Indigenous communities in Brazil from 2001 to 2023, 75% occurred within the states of Amazonas, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, and Pará, with corresponding increases in burned areas and deforestation rates of 75% and 45%, respectively, primarily between 2010 and 2020 (da Silva <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>). In addition, a decline in rainfall during this 22-year period further impacted the Amazon's hydrological cycle, critical to maintaining continental climate stability (Nobre <i>et al</i>. <span>2016</span>; Santos <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>). Recent droughts have highlighted the system's fragility, underscoring the urgent need for comprehensive assessments of its resilience to anthropogenic climate change to prevent or mitigate catastrophic losses of ecosystem services such as the provision of food and fresh water (Ottoni <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Addressing these challenges requires sophisticated and localized strategies that account for the Amazon's ecological heterogeneity. Immediate and coordinated governmental actions are crucial, particularly in collaboration with Indigenous territories. Establishing effective monitoring systems in partnership with Indigenous communities is imperative to fully comprehend the impacts of land-use and land-cover change on regional climate dynamics, as well as their hydroclimatic, ecological, and conservation implications for Indigenous populations. Data obtained from these monitoring systems should inform public policy in the Amazon. Implementing this collaborative governmental-Indigenous approach represents a delicate balance but is essential to tailor strategies to maintain forest health and climate stability.</p><p>At the August 2023 summit in Belém, representatives from the eight Amazonian countries—Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela—emphasized regional authorities’ commitment to environmental stewardship. Despite criticisms of its modest ambitions, the Belém Declaration established a vital framework for future efforts in conservation and sustainable development (Peña-Claros and Nobre <span>2023</span>). Effective implementation of agreements like the one in Belém will require a detailed analysis and a clear strategic plan. The success of environmental preservation relies on sustained international support and collaboration, underscoring the importance of global interconnectedness in shaping regional policies. Furthermore, pooling efforts and financial resources from various countries could substantially boost funding for conservation activities in the Amazon. For example, the establishment of protected areas for biodiversity conservation and Indigenous land protection has been a principal strategy for controlling deforestation in the region. However, such protected areas remain largely unfunded and ill-protected, often failing to achieve their intended goals, as highlighted by da Silva <i>et al</i>. (<span>2017</span>), Pörtner <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>), and Soares-Filho <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>).</p><p>Enhancing collaborative efforts to manage deforestation and wildfires is crucial, as underscored by the inadequate discussions at the 2023 summit in Belém. A more thorough analysis of existing regional cooperation mechanisms, such as the intergovernmental Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) as well as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change's REDD+ initiatives aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, is imperative. Emphasizing strategic international and local capacity-building initiatives within these frameworks can enhance their effectiveness, reinforce their operational capacity, and help address the region's complicated challenges in environmental management (de Souza <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>). Importantly, municipalities play a critical role in this context, as they are at the forefront of executing and monitoring these initiatives. Often, infractions and illegal activities originate within the municipalities where Indigenous territories and protected areas are located, making local governance a pivotal factor in the success of environmental protection efforts. Acknowledging and strengthening municipal involvement can bridge the gap between national policies and local actions, essential for effective management and conservation. Furthermore, the marked decrease in carbon stocks in the region will have an outsized climate-change impact and direct economic implications, given that the potential future value of decarbonization credits could reach up to US$29.36 million (Feitosa <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>The implications of deforestation and wildfires on Indigenous lands in the Amazon extend beyond immediate environmental damage, profoundly affecting the health and livelihoods of Indigenous communities and directly impacting the regional bioeconomy. In addition, the degradation and vulnerability of Indigenous populations must be studied to prevent their extinction. Collective approaches that incorporate traditional knowledge and academic research provide insights that benefit many stakeholders, ensuring that environmental strategies respect and leverage the deep-rooted understanding that Indigenous peoples have of their ecosystems. Furthermore, promoting both forest retention and human welfare could be most effectively achieved in those municipalities where a large portion of the territory consists of protected areas or Indigenous lands, such as in several municipalities in Amapá, Pará, Amazonas, and Roraima. Successful management of these areas not only fulfills conservation goals but also generates sufficient revenue to support robust local economies (Dias <i>et al</i>. <span>2016</span>).</p><p>In summary, safeguarding Indigenous territories in the Amazon requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the complex interactions between environmental conservation, sustainable resource management, and climate-change mitigation. This strategy must be grounded in multidisciplinary research, with collaboration across environmental, economic, and social science domains. Only through a collaborative and scientifically oriented framework can we preserve biodiversity and the cultural integrity of Indigenous peoples. These are invaluable assets for recognizing the historical significance of Indigenous peoples, preserving the current environment, and safeguarding future biodiversity and climate stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2796","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within Indigenous territories in the Amazon—particularly in a >5 million square kilometer area collectively known as the Legal Amazon or Amazônia Legal, where more than half of the Brazilian Indigenous population resides—deforestation and wildfires pose major threats to biodiversity and the cultural survival of native peoples (Vieira and da Silva 2024). Illegal activities such as logging and mineral extraction, which are often driven by economic interests that disregard the legally guaranteed territorial rights of Indigenous communities, exacerbate these threats and thereby further adversely impact biodiversity and the cultural integrity of native peoples in the region. Environmental degradation not only impairs the traditional lifestyles of these communities but also intensifies global, regional, and local drivers contributing to climate change (Soares-Filho et al2010; Estrada et al2022).

Climate extremes in the Amazon have amplified in frequency and intensity, and the risks to Indigenous populations and environments have concurrently expanded. Given this complex picture of dynamic physical changes interacting with diverse social dimensions over time, forecasting the potentially exacerbated risk of climate-related disasters becomes an important scientific challenge (Antunes et al2016; de Souza et al2024). The region's vulnerability to extreme climatic conditions and human disturbances, such as deforestation and wildfires, remains poorly understood despite increased research efforts. This knowledge gap presents substantial risks, compounded by hydrological stress that disrupts plant physiological processes and regional climate dynamics. Of the wildfires that impacted Indigenous communities in Brazil from 2001 to 2023, 75% occurred within the states of Amazonas, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, and Pará, with corresponding increases in burned areas and deforestation rates of 75% and 45%, respectively, primarily between 2010 and 2020 (da Silva et al2023). In addition, a decline in rainfall during this 22-year period further impacted the Amazon's hydrological cycle, critical to maintaining continental climate stability (Nobre et al2016; Santos et al2024). Recent droughts have highlighted the system's fragility, underscoring the urgent need for comprehensive assessments of its resilience to anthropogenic climate change to prevent or mitigate catastrophic losses of ecosystem services such as the provision of food and fresh water (Ottoni et al2023).

Addressing these challenges requires sophisticated and localized strategies that account for the Amazon's ecological heterogeneity. Immediate and coordinated governmental actions are crucial, particularly in collaboration with Indigenous territories. Establishing effective monitoring systems in partnership with Indigenous communities is imperative to fully comprehend the impacts of land-use and land-cover change on regional climate dynamics, as well as their hydroclimatic, ecological, and conservation implications for Indigenous populations. Data obtained from these monitoring systems should inform public policy in the Amazon. Implementing this collaborative governmental-Indigenous approach represents a delicate balance but is essential to tailor strategies to maintain forest health and climate stability.

At the August 2023 summit in Belém, representatives from the eight Amazonian countries—Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela—emphasized regional authorities’ commitment to environmental stewardship. Despite criticisms of its modest ambitions, the Belém Declaration established a vital framework for future efforts in conservation and sustainable development (Peña-Claros and Nobre 2023). Effective implementation of agreements like the one in Belém will require a detailed analysis and a clear strategic plan. The success of environmental preservation relies on sustained international support and collaboration, underscoring the importance of global interconnectedness in shaping regional policies. Furthermore, pooling efforts and financial resources from various countries could substantially boost funding for conservation activities in the Amazon. For example, the establishment of protected areas for biodiversity conservation and Indigenous land protection has been a principal strategy for controlling deforestation in the region. However, such protected areas remain largely unfunded and ill-protected, often failing to achieve their intended goals, as highlighted by da Silva et al. (2017), Pörtner et al. (2023), and Soares-Filho et al. (2023).

Enhancing collaborative efforts to manage deforestation and wildfires is crucial, as underscored by the inadequate discussions at the 2023 summit in Belém. A more thorough analysis of existing regional cooperation mechanisms, such as the intergovernmental Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) as well as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change's REDD+ initiatives aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, is imperative. Emphasizing strategic international and local capacity-building initiatives within these frameworks can enhance their effectiveness, reinforce their operational capacity, and help address the region's complicated challenges in environmental management (de Souza et al2024). Importantly, municipalities play a critical role in this context, as they are at the forefront of executing and monitoring these initiatives. Often, infractions and illegal activities originate within the municipalities where Indigenous territories and protected areas are located, making local governance a pivotal factor in the success of environmental protection efforts. Acknowledging and strengthening municipal involvement can bridge the gap between national policies and local actions, essential for effective management and conservation. Furthermore, the marked decrease in carbon stocks in the region will have an outsized climate-change impact and direct economic implications, given that the potential future value of decarbonization credits could reach up to US$29.36 million (Feitosa et al2023).

The implications of deforestation and wildfires on Indigenous lands in the Amazon extend beyond immediate environmental damage, profoundly affecting the health and livelihoods of Indigenous communities and directly impacting the regional bioeconomy. In addition, the degradation and vulnerability of Indigenous populations must be studied to prevent their extinction. Collective approaches that incorporate traditional knowledge and academic research provide insights that benefit many stakeholders, ensuring that environmental strategies respect and leverage the deep-rooted understanding that Indigenous peoples have of their ecosystems. Furthermore, promoting both forest retention and human welfare could be most effectively achieved in those municipalities where a large portion of the territory consists of protected areas or Indigenous lands, such as in several municipalities in Amapá, Pará, Amazonas, and Roraima. Successful management of these areas not only fulfills conservation goals but also generates sufficient revenue to support robust local economies (Dias et al2016).

In summary, safeguarding Indigenous territories in the Amazon requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the complex interactions between environmental conservation, sustainable resource management, and climate-change mitigation. This strategy must be grounded in multidisciplinary research, with collaboration across environmental, economic, and social science domains. Only through a collaborative and scientifically oriented framework can we preserve biodiversity and the cultural integrity of Indigenous peoples. These are invaluable assets for recognizing the historical significance of Indigenous peoples, preserving the current environment, and safeguarding future biodiversity and climate stability.

保护亚马逊土著土地:多学科方法
在亚马孙地区的土著领地内,尤其是在被统称为合法亚马孙或合法亚马孙的 500 万平方公里区域内,一半以上的巴西土著人口居住在这里,森林砍伐和野火对生物多样性和土著人民的文化生存构成了重大威胁(维埃拉和达席尔瓦,2024 年)。伐木和矿产开采等非法活动往往受经济利益驱使,无视土著社区受法律保障的领土权利,加剧了这些威胁,从而进一步对该地区的生物多样性和原住民的文化完整性造成不利影响。环境退化不仅损害了这些社区的传统生活方式,还加剧了全球、区域和地方气候变化的驱动因素(Soares-Filho 等人,2010 年;Estrada 等人,2022 年)。鉴于随着时间的推移,动态物理变化与不同社会层面相互作用的复杂情况,预测气候相关灾害的潜在加剧风险成为一项重要的科学挑战(Antunes 等,2016 年;de Souza 等,2024 年)。尽管加大了研究力度,但人们对该地区易受极端气候条件和人类干扰(如森林砍伐和野火)影响的程度仍然知之甚少。这一知识空白带来了巨大的风险,而水文压力又扰乱了植物生理过程和区域气候动态。在 2001 年至 2023 年影响巴西土著社区的野火中,75% 发生在亚马孙州、托坎廷斯州、马托格罗索州和帕拉州,烧毁面积和森林砍伐率分别相应增加了 75% 和 45%,主要发生在 2010 年至 2020 年期间(da Silva 等,2023 年)。此外,这 22 年间降雨量的减少进一步影响了亚马逊的水文循环,而水文循环对维持大陆气候稳定至关重要(Nobre 等人,2016 年;Santos 等人,2024 年)。最近的干旱凸显了该系统的脆弱性,突出表明迫切需要全面评估其对人为气候变化的适应能力,以防止或减轻生态系统服务的灾难性损失,如提供食物和淡水(Ottoni 等,2023 年)。立即采取协调一致的政府行动至关重要,尤其是与土著领地合作。与土著社区合作建立有效的监测系统势在必行,这样才能充分了解土地利用和土地覆盖变化对区域气候动态的影响,以及其对土著居民在水文气候、生态和保护方面的影响。从这些监测系统中获得的数据应为亚马逊地区的公共政策提供参考。在 8 月于贝伦举行的 2023 年峰会上,来自亚马逊八国--玻利维亚、巴西、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、圭亚那、秘鲁、苏里南和委内瑞拉--的代表强调了地区当局对环境管理的承诺。尽管有人批评《贝伦宣言》的雄心不大,但它为今后的保护和可持续发展工作建立了一个重要框架(Pena-Claros 和 Nobre,2023 年)。要有效执行类似《贝伦宣言》的协议,就必须进行详细分析并制定明确的战略计划。环境保护的成功有赖于持续的国际支持与合作,这凸显了全球相互联系在制定地区政策方面的重要性。此外,汇集各国的力量和财政资源可以大大增加亚马逊地区保护活动的资金。例如,建立保护区以保护生物多样性和土著土地一直是该地区控制森林砍伐的主要战略。然而,正如 da Silva 等人(2017 年)、Pörtner 等人(2023 年)和 Soares-Filho 等人(2023 年)所强调的那样,这些保护区在很大程度上仍然缺乏资金,保护不力,往往无法实现预期目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信