Neuroticism and cognitive correlates of depression and anxiety in endometriosis: A meta-analytic review, evidence appraisal, and future recommendations

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Neuroticism and cognitive correlates of depression and anxiety in endometriosis: A meta-analytic review, evidence appraisal, and future recommendations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in endometriosis and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. Additionally, this review aimed to evaluate the quality of research and formulate recommendations for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted across databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ProQuest) through to February 2024. Search terms were used for endometriosis, depression, anxiety, cognitive factors and personality traits. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to produce pooled weighted effects (<em>r</em>) for factor-symptom relationships.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen studies (11 samples; <em>N</em> = 3287; M<sub>age</sub> 33.89 ± 2.48) were included in a narrative synthesis. One study provided evidence for a positive association between neuroticism and depression. Seven studies contributed to meta-analyses on three cognitive factors. Medium-to-large associations were identified between illness perceptions of low control/power (<em>r</em> = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.01,0.62), rumination (<em>r</em> = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.09, 0.78), pain-catastrophising (<em>r</em> = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.45) and higher levels of depression. The statistical power to detect significant effects was &gt;80 %. Findings for anxiety were non-significant, although limited data were available. Quality appraisal revealed a high risk of within-study bias (4.69 ± 1.38, range: 3–7), with issues related to sample representativeness and measurement selection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Rumination, pain-catastrophising, and illness perceptions of low control/power are important in understanding depression in endometriosis. There is a lack of research on personality traits, necessitating further study. Findings highlight the importance of prioritising modifiable cognitive factors in psychological research and clinical practice in endometriosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003180/pdfft?md5=529d62b42fc285a09c8de50fd79e9189&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924003180-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in endometriosis and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. Additionally, this review aimed to evaluate the quality of research and formulate recommendations for future research.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ProQuest) through to February 2024. Search terms were used for endometriosis, depression, anxiety, cognitive factors and personality traits. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to produce pooled weighted effects (r) for factor-symptom relationships.

Results

Thirteen studies (11 samples; N = 3287; Mage 33.89 ± 2.48) were included in a narrative synthesis. One study provided evidence for a positive association between neuroticism and depression. Seven studies contributed to meta-analyses on three cognitive factors. Medium-to-large associations were identified between illness perceptions of low control/power (r = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.01,0.62), rumination (r = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.09, 0.78), pain-catastrophising (r = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.45) and higher levels of depression. The statistical power to detect significant effects was >80 %. Findings for anxiety were non-significant, although limited data were available. Quality appraisal revealed a high risk of within-study bias (4.69 ± 1.38, range: 3–7), with issues related to sample representativeness and measurement selection.

Conclusion

Rumination, pain-catastrophising, and illness perceptions of low control/power are important in understanding depression in endometriosis. There is a lack of research on personality traits, necessitating further study. Findings highlight the importance of prioritising modifiable cognitive factors in psychological research and clinical practice in endometriosis.

子宫内膜异位症患者抑郁和焦虑的神经质和认知相关性:荟萃分析回顾、证据评估和未来建议
目的本荟萃分析综述旨在综合与子宫内膜异位症患者抑郁和焦虑相关的人格和认知因素的证据,并确定社会人口学和临床变量是否会调节因素与症状之间的关系。此外,本综述还旨在评估研究质量,并为未来研究提出建议。方法:对截至 2024 年 2 月的数据库(Medline、Embase、PsycInfo、Web of Science、ProQuest)进行了系统检索。检索词包括子宫内膜异位症、抑郁、焦虑、认知因素和人格特质。结果13项研究(11个样本;N = 3287;Mage 33.89 ± 2.48)被纳入叙述性综述。其中一项研究证明神经质与抑郁之间存在正相关。七项研究对三个认知因素进行了荟萃分析。研究发现,对疾病的低控制/低能力感知(r = 0.35,95 % CI:0.01,0.62)、反刍(r = 0.52,95 % CI:0.09,0.78)、疼痛-灾难化(r = 0.37,95 % CI:0.28,0.45)与抑郁程度较高之间存在中到大型的关联。检测重大影响的统计能力为 80%。尽管数据有限,但焦虑方面的研究结果并不显著。质量评估显示,研究内部偏倚的风险较高(4.69 ± 1.38,范围:3-7),存在与样本代表性和测量选择相关的问题。由于缺乏对人格特质的研究,因此有必要开展进一步研究。研究结果强调了在子宫内膜异位症的心理研究和临床实践中优先考虑可改变的认知因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信