Analysis of the characteristics and evaluation of ecological functions of local wetlands distributed in Chungcheongnam-do, Rep. of Korea

IF 3.9 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107381

Miok Park

{"title":"Analysis of the characteristics and evaluation of ecological functions of local wetlands distributed in Chungcheongnam-do, Rep. of Korea","authors":"Miok Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Local wetlands such as APW provide ecosystem service benefits to local residents, and as a nature-based carbon sink, they play a key role in improving local resilience and adapting to climate change. This study was conducted to evaluate function of local wetlands that are ecologically important, but are damaged in blind spots of management, and to reveal differences by ecological area and function through functional evaluation. Functional scores for each of the eight evaluation items were compared by dividing them into 3 catchments according to the watershed system and topography using modified ‘RAM’. As a result of the evaluation, the overall average function of 399 priority wetlands was 1.96/3.0, which was medium-level, and among the eight evaluation items, AESREC, Habitat, and AQHAB function were high. In detail it was confirmed in order of AESREC, Habitat, AQHAB, WQUAL, RUNOFF, SHPRO, GWATER and FSTOR. The average function for each catchment were in order of 02GG, 01SAM, 03WS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002064/pdfft?md5=b27112bb2892a0fa6d9892da4829981e&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local wetlands such as APW provide ecosystem service benefits to local residents, and as a nature-based carbon sink, they play a key role in improving local resilience and adapting to climate change. This study was conducted to evaluate function of local wetlands that are ecologically important, but are damaged in blind spots of management, and to reveal differences by ecological area and function through functional evaluation. Functional scores for each of the eight evaluation items were compared by dividing them into 3 catchments according to the watershed system and topography using modified ‘RAM’. As a result of the evaluation, the overall average function of 399 priority wetlands was 1.96/3.0, which was medium-level, and among the eight evaluation items, AESREC, Habitat, and AQHAB function were high. In detail it was confirmed in order of AESREC, Habitat, AQHAB, WQUAL, RUNOFF, SHPRO, GWATER and FSTOR. The average function for each catchment were in order of 02GG, 01SAM, 03WS.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对分布在大韩民国忠清南道的地方湿地的特征进行分析并评估其生态功能

亚太湿地中心等地方湿地为当地居民提供生态系统服务效益，作为基于自然的碳汇，它们在提高地方复原力和适应气候变化方面发挥着关键作用。本研究旨在对具有重要生态意义、但在管理盲区中遭到破坏的当地湿地进行功能评估，并通过功能评估揭示不同生态区域和功能的差异。根据流域系统和地形将湿地划分为 3 个集水区，使用修改后的 "RAM "对 8 个评价项目的功能得分进行比较。评价结果显示，399 块优先湿地的总体平均功能为 1.96/3.0，属于中等水平，在 8 个评价项目中，AESREC、Habitat 和 AQHAB 功能较高。具体而言，依次为 AESREC、Habitat、AQHAB、WQUAL、RUNOFF、SHPRO、GWATER 和 FSTOR。各集水区的平均功能依次为 02GG、01SAM、03WS。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程：环境

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

293

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.