Recurrent and De Novo Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis After Kidney Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Features and Transplant Outcomes

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Recurrent and De Novo Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis After Kidney Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Features and Transplant Outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a notable subtype of glomerulonephritis in kidney transplantation, often resulting in graft failure. Yet, research comparing transplant outcomes between de novo and recurrent FSGS is scarce. This study aims to compare clinical features and transplant outcomes between these two categories.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study enrolled 773 kidney transplant recipients from two centers between January 2008 and October 2021. Patients diagnosed with FSGS through graft kidney biopsy were included. They were categorized into two groups based on the time of FSGS occurrence and results of native kidney biopsy: the recurrent FSGS group and the de novo FSGS group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 773 kidney transplant patients, 24 had primary FSGS-causing end-stage renal disease. During a median 65-month follow-up, 5 of these patients developed recurrent FSGS (incidence: 26.3%). Among 749 patients with other kidney diseases causing end-stage renal disease, 9 had de novo FSGS (incidence: 1.2%). In the recurrent FSGS group, 2 out of 5 patients experienced graft failure, with no deaths or acute rejections. Similarly, in the de novo FSGS group, 3 out of 9 patients experienced graft failure, with no deaths or acute rejections. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed slower graft loss in de novo FSGS, resulting in a higher graft survival rate compared to recurrent FSGS (probability of graft survival, 60% vs 33.3%, <em>P</em> = .036).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Graft loss progresses more slowly in de novo FSGS compared to recurrent FSGS, resulting in a higher long-term graft survival rate in de novo FSGS than in recurrent FSGS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a notable subtype of glomerulonephritis in kidney transplantation, often resulting in graft failure. Yet, research comparing transplant outcomes between de novo and recurrent FSGS is scarce. This study aims to compare clinical features and transplant outcomes between these two categories.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 773 kidney transplant recipients from two centers between January 2008 and October 2021. Patients diagnosed with FSGS through graft kidney biopsy were included. They were categorized into two groups based on the time of FSGS occurrence and results of native kidney biopsy: the recurrent FSGS group and the de novo FSGS group.

Results

Of 773 kidney transplant patients, 24 had primary FSGS-causing end-stage renal disease. During a median 65-month follow-up, 5 of these patients developed recurrent FSGS (incidence: 26.3%). Among 749 patients with other kidney diseases causing end-stage renal disease, 9 had de novo FSGS (incidence: 1.2%). In the recurrent FSGS group, 2 out of 5 patients experienced graft failure, with no deaths or acute rejections. Similarly, in the de novo FSGS group, 3 out of 9 patients experienced graft failure, with no deaths or acute rejections. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed slower graft loss in de novo FSGS, resulting in a higher graft survival rate compared to recurrent FSGS (probability of graft survival, 60% vs 33.3%, P = .036).

Conclusions

Graft loss progresses more slowly in de novo FSGS compared to recurrent FSGS, resulting in a higher long-term graft survival rate in de novo FSGS than in recurrent FSGS.

肾移植后复发性和新发局灶性肾小球硬化症:临床特征与移植结果的比较。
背景:局灶节段性肾小球硬化症(FSGS)是肾移植中肾小球肾炎的一个显著亚型,通常会导致移植失败。然而,比较新发和复发性 FSGS 移植结果的研究却很少。本研究旨在比较这两类患者的临床特征和移植结果:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月间来自两个中心的 773 名肾移植受者。通过移植肾活检确诊为 FSGS 的患者被纳入研究。根据FSGS发生的时间和原肾活检的结果,将他们分为两组:复发性FSGS组和新生FSGS组:结果:在 773 名肾移植患者中,24 人患有原发性 FSGS 导致的终末期肾病。在中位 65 个月的随访期间,其中 5 名患者出现了复发性 FSGS(发生率:26.3%)。在 749 名患有其他肾脏疾病并导致终末期肾病的患者中,9 人患有新发 FSGS(发病率:1.2%)。在复发性 FSGS 组中,5 位患者中有 2 位出现移植失败,但没有死亡或急性排斥反应。同样,在新发 FSGS 组中,9 位患者中有 3 位出现移植失败,但没有死亡或急性排斥反应。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与复发性FSGS相比,新发FSGS的移植物丢失速度较慢,因此移植物存活率较高(移植物存活概率为60% vs 33.3%,P = .036):结论:与复发性 FSGS 相比,新发 FSGS 的移植物丢失进展更慢,因此新发 FSGS 的移植物长期存活率高于复发性 FSGS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信