Evaluation of the effectiveness of a segmented alternating shift pattern based on wearable vital signs monitoring devices during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Meilian Xie, Zhiyun Zhang, Ronghua Jin, Xiaoyou Chen, Zhe Liu, Jianping Ma, Wenying Qiao
{"title":"Evaluation of the effectiveness of a segmented alternating shift pattern based on wearable vital signs monitoring devices during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Meilian Xie, Zhiyun Zhang, Ronghua Jin, Xiaoyou Chen, Zhe Liu, Jianping Ma, Wenying Qiao","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02274-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of an alternating shift pattern in two-hour segments in the state of emergency management of public health events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional research design was conducted in our study. The nursing staff working in the admission ward of suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 in December 2022 were selected as subjects by the whole-group sampling method. We adopted a shift pattern of alternating shifts every two-hour in the isolation wards. The vital signs parameters were captured by uniformly wearing the multi-signs sensing devices, and the questionnaires collected the symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven female participants, with a mean age of 33.09 ± 5.96 years, were included in this study. Measurements of body temperature (T), blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), respiratory rate (RR), and heart rate (HR) while wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) all remained within normal limits. None of the nurses reported sweating, dizziness, blurred vision, palpitations, or dyspnea. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between the critical care group and the non-critical care group in terms of age (P = 0.041), working duration (P = 0.036), and the total number of entries into isolation areas for nursing care (rounds) (P = 0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in vital signs based on age, work duration, or body mass index (BMI). The data indicated a notable increase in body temperature compared to other vital sign parameters with increasing work time while wearing PPE. Body temperature approached the upper limit when working close to 2 h long.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The alternating shift pattern in two-hour segments can effectively maintain the physical well-being of nurses wearing PPE without increasing the burden on nursing staff or the wastage of protective materials. This approach is recommended for addressing similar public health events in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02274-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of an alternating shift pattern in two-hour segments in the state of emergency management of public health events.

Methods: A cross-sectional research design was conducted in our study. The nursing staff working in the admission ward of suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 in December 2022 were selected as subjects by the whole-group sampling method. We adopted a shift pattern of alternating shifts every two-hour in the isolation wards. The vital signs parameters were captured by uniformly wearing the multi-signs sensing devices, and the questionnaires collected the symptoms.

Results: Sixty-seven female participants, with a mean age of 33.09 ± 5.96 years, were included in this study. Measurements of body temperature (T), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and heart rate (HR) while wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) all remained within normal limits. None of the nurses reported sweating, dizziness, blurred vision, palpitations, or dyspnea. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between the critical care group and the non-critical care group in terms of age (P = 0.041), working duration (P = 0.036), and the total number of entries into isolation areas for nursing care (rounds) (P = 0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in vital signs based on age, work duration, or body mass index (BMI). The data indicated a notable increase in body temperature compared to other vital sign parameters with increasing work time while wearing PPE. Body temperature approached the upper limit when working close to 2 h long.

Conclusions: The alternating shift pattern in two-hour segments can effectively maintain the physical well-being of nurses wearing PPE without increasing the burden on nursing staff or the wastage of protective materials. This approach is recommended for addressing similar public health events in the future.

评估 COVID-19 期间基于可穿戴生命体征监测设备的分段交替轮班模式的有效性:一项横断面研究。
目的:探讨在公共卫生事件应急管理中采用两小时交替轮班模式的可行性和有效性:研究采用横断面研究设计。采用整群抽样法选取 2022 年 12 月在 COVID-19 疑似或确诊患者入院病房工作的护理人员作为研究对象。我们在隔离病房采用每两小时交替换班的轮班模式。统一佩戴多体征传感设备采集生命体征参数,问卷调查收集症状:本研究共纳入 67 名女性参与者,平均年龄(33.09±5.96)岁。在佩戴个人防护设备(PPE)时,体温(T)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率(RR)和心率(HR)的测量值均保持在正常范围内。没有一名护士报告出汗、头晕、视力模糊、心悸或呼吸困难。统计分析显示,危重症护理组和非危重症护理组在年龄(P = 0.041)、工作时间(P = 0.036)和进入隔离区进行护理(查房)的总次数(P = 0.007)方面存在明显差异。然而,根据年龄、工作持续时间或体重指数(BMI)的不同,生命体征的差异没有统计学意义。数据显示,与其他生命体征参数相比,随着穿戴个人防护设备工作时间的延长,体温会明显升高。当工作时间接近 2 小时时,体温接近上限:两小时交替轮班模式可有效保持穿戴个人防护设备的护士的身体健康,同时不会增加护理人员的负担或防护材料的浪费。建议今后在处理类似公共卫生事件时采用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信