Abdominal Mesh Colpopexy Without Promontory Fixation: 10-Year Follow-up Results of the Peritoneocolpopexy Technique.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sara B Papp, Alana L Christie, Dominic Lee, Philippe E Zimmern
{"title":"Abdominal Mesh Colpopexy Without Promontory Fixation: 10-Year Follow-up Results of the Peritoneocolpopexy Technique.","authors":"Sara B Papp, Alana L Christie, Dominic Lee, Philippe E Zimmern","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To restore apical vaginal prolapse support when the access to the promontory is challenging, a modified method of colpopexy may be needed. We present our 10-year results on the peritoneocolpopexy (PCP) technique without promontory fixation relying on unidirectional barbed delayed absorbable sutures (V-Loc).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen women who underwent PCP for vaginal vault prolapse between 2011 and 2014 participated in an IRB-approved prospective study (11 noninfected; 3 with infected mesh needing excision). Ten-year follow-up data including validated questionnaires (Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), QoL), pelvic organ prolapse quantifications (POP-Q), complications, reoperations, and secondary prolapses were collected. Paired statistical analyses compared various timepoints and mixed model analysis assessed questionnaire and POP-Q trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 9.7years (interquartile range (IQR): 6.0-0.7) to last POP-Q and 10.4years (IQR: 9.6-11.5) to last contact. No patients were lost to follow-up. Mean baseline C point for all patients was -4.3 and -2.9; 1-year C point was -9.1 and -9.2 and -8.6 and -8.5, respectively at last visit. POP-Q findings improved between pre-PCP and 1-year post surgery and did not significantly change until the last visit. Trends in UDI-6, IIQ-7, QoL, and POP-Q findings showed no significant change in any category per year (95% confidence interval (CI), P=.2-.9). Secondary anterior compartment prolapse was noted in 3 patients with 1 requiring a repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCP provides durable vaginal apical support when access to the promontory is compromised. PCP can also be used to prevent secondary prolapse after an infected mesh removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To restore apical vaginal prolapse support when the access to the promontory is challenging, a modified method of colpopexy may be needed. We present our 10-year results on the peritoneocolpopexy (PCP) technique without promontory fixation relying on unidirectional barbed delayed absorbable sutures (V-Loc).

Methods: Fourteen women who underwent PCP for vaginal vault prolapse between 2011 and 2014 participated in an IRB-approved prospective study (11 noninfected; 3 with infected mesh needing excision). Ten-year follow-up data including validated questionnaires (Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), QoL), pelvic organ prolapse quantifications (POP-Q), complications, reoperations, and secondary prolapses were collected. Paired statistical analyses compared various timepoints and mixed model analysis assessed questionnaire and POP-Q trends over time.

Results: Median follow-up was 9.7years (interquartile range (IQR): 6.0-0.7) to last POP-Q and 10.4years (IQR: 9.6-11.5) to last contact. No patients were lost to follow-up. Mean baseline C point for all patients was -4.3 and -2.9; 1-year C point was -9.1 and -9.2 and -8.6 and -8.5, respectively at last visit. POP-Q findings improved between pre-PCP and 1-year post surgery and did not significantly change until the last visit. Trends in UDI-6, IIQ-7, QoL, and POP-Q findings showed no significant change in any category per year (95% confidence interval (CI), P=.2-.9). Secondary anterior compartment prolapse was noted in 3 patients with 1 requiring a repair.

Conclusion: PCP provides durable vaginal apical support when access to the promontory is compromised. PCP can also be used to prevent secondary prolapse after an infected mesh removal.

腹腔网膜结肠切除术(无穹隆固定):腹膜结肠切除术 10 年随访结果
目的:在难以进入阴道前突的情况下,为了恢复阴道顶端脱垂的支撑,可能需要一种改良的阴道成形术。我们介绍了我们使用单向带倒刺延迟可吸收缝合线(V-Loc)进行腹膜结肠阴道成形术(PCP)的十年结果:14 名在 2011 年至 2014 年期间因阴道穹隆脱垂而接受 PCP 手术的女性参加了一项经 IRB 批准的前瞻性研究(11 名未受感染;3 名受感染的网片需要切除)。研究人员收集了十年的随访数据,包括有效问卷(UDI-6、IIQ-7、QoL)、盆腔器官脱垂量化(POP-Q)、并发症、再次手术和继发性脱垂。配对统计分析比较了不同的时间点,混合模型分析评估了问卷调查和 POP-Q 随时间变化的趋势:中位随访距最后一次 POP-Q 调查时间为 9.7 年(IQR:6.0 - 0.7),距最后一次接触时间为 10.4 年(IQR:9.6 - 11.5)。没有患者失去随访。所有患者的平均基线 C 点分别为-4.3 和-2.9;最后一次就诊时的 1 年 C 点分别为-9.1 和-9.2,以及-8.6 和-8.5。POP-Q 结果在术前和术后 1 年间有所改善,直到最后一次就诊时才出现明显变化。UDI-6、IIQ-7、QoL 和 POP-Q 结果的趋势显示,任何类别每年均无明显变化(95% CI,p = 0.2 - 0.9)。3例患者出现继发性前室脱垂,其中1例需要进行修复:结论:当进入阴道前壁的通道受到影响时,腹膜结肠造口术可提供持久的阴道前壁支撑。腹膜结肠造口术还可用于预防感染性网片切除后的继发性脱垂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信