Pathogenic Detection by Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing in Spinal Infections.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005148
Chuqiang Yin, Yanan Cong, Huafeng Wang, Dechun Wang, Xizhong Yang, Xuesong Wang, Ting Wang
{"title":"Pathogenic Detection by Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing in Spinal Infections.","authors":"Chuqiang Yin, Yanan Cong, Huafeng Wang, Dechun Wang, Xizhong Yang, Xuesong Wang, Ting Wang","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the ability and value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from spinal infections.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The pathogenic diagnosis of primary spinal infection is challenging. The widespread application of mNGs in clinical practice makes it particularly useful in detecting rare, emerging, and atypical complex infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2019 to December 2023, 120 samples were retrospectively collected from patients suspected of spinal infections and undergoing treatment. Pairwise comparisons between traditional laboratory tests and mNGS were conducted for all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 120 cases, 95 were diagnosed as spinal infections, while 25 were classified as noninfectious. Microbiological evidence was found in 59 cases, while 36 cases were clinically diagnosed as spinal infections without definitive microbiological evidence. Rare microorganisms such as Aspergillus fumigatus , Taifanglania major , and Coxiella burnetii were detected by mNGS. The positive rate of mNGS was significantly higher at 88.42% compared with microbiological culture (43.16%), P <0.001. At the genus level, mNGS exhibited a consistency rate of 86.44% (51/59) with confirmed microorganisms. MNGS demonstrated very good agreement with clinically confirmed microorganisms at the genus level (κ=0.833). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mNGS were 86.44%, 92.00%, 96.23%, and 74.19%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mNGS test exhibits rapidity, efficiency, and accuracy, rendering it of immense diagnostic and therapeutic value in the realm of spinal infection diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"E70-E75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective, observational study.

Objective: To evaluate the ability and value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from spinal infections.

Background: The pathogenic diagnosis of primary spinal infection is challenging. The widespread application of mNGs in clinical practice makes it particularly useful in detecting rare, emerging, and atypical complex infectious diseases.

Methods: From January 2019 to December 2023, 120 samples were retrospectively collected from patients suspected of spinal infections and undergoing treatment. Pairwise comparisons between traditional laboratory tests and mNGS were conducted for all cases.

Results: Among the 120 cases, 95 were diagnosed as spinal infections, while 25 were classified as noninfectious. Microbiological evidence was found in 59 cases, while 36 cases were clinically diagnosed as spinal infections without definitive microbiological evidence. Rare microorganisms such as Aspergillus fumigatus , Taifanglania major , and Coxiella burnetii were detected by mNGS. The positive rate of mNGS was significantly higher at 88.42% compared with microbiological culture (43.16%), P <0.001. At the genus level, mNGS exhibited a consistency rate of 86.44% (51/59) with confirmed microorganisms. MNGS demonstrated very good agreement with clinically confirmed microorganisms at the genus level (κ=0.833). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mNGS were 86.44%, 92.00%, 96.23%, and 74.19%, respectively.

Conclusions: The mNGS test exhibits rapidity, efficiency, and accuracy, rendering it of immense diagnostic and therapeutic value in the realm of spinal infection diseases.

通过元基因组下一代测序检测脊柱感染中的病原体。
研究设计回顾性观察研究:评估元基因组新一代测序(mNGS)检测脊柱感染病原体的能力和价值:背景:原发性脊柱感染的病原体诊断具有挑战性。mNGs在临床实践中的广泛应用使其在检测罕见的、新出现的和非典型的复杂传染病方面特别有用:方法:从 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月,从疑似脊柱感染并接受治疗的患者中回顾性采集了 120 份样本。对所有病例进行传统实验室检测与 mNGS 的配对比较:结果:在 120 个病例中,95 例被诊断为脊柱感染,25 例被归类为非感染性。59 例找到了微生物证据,36 例经临床诊断为脊柱感染,但没有明确的微生物证据。mNGS 检测到了烟曲霉、Taifanglania major 和烧伤柯西氏菌等罕见微生物。与微生物培养(43.16%)相比,mNGS 的阳性率明显更高,达到 88.42%:mNGS 检验具有快速、高效和准确的特点,在脊柱感染疾病领域具有巨大的诊断和治疗价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信