Long-Term Loss of Alignment Following ASD Surgery in the Absence of Mechanical Complications: Aging Spine?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005142
Sleiman Haddad, Eva Jacobs, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Aleix Ruiz de Villa, Anika Pupak, Maggie Barcheni, Manuel Ramírez Valencia, Javier Pizones, Frank S Kleinstück, Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Ahmet Alanay, Ibrahim Obeid, Ferran Pellisé
{"title":"Long-Term Loss of Alignment Following ASD Surgery in the Absence of Mechanical Complications: Aging Spine?","authors":"Sleiman Haddad, Eva Jacobs, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Aleix Ruiz de Villa, Anika Pupak, Maggie Barcheni, Manuel Ramírez Valencia, Javier Pizones, Frank S Kleinstück, Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Ahmet Alanay, Ibrahim Obeid, Ferran Pellisé","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) registry.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess whether spinal alignment deteriorates postsurgery in the absence of mechanical complications and evaluate the long-term outcomes of ASD surgery over a 5-year period.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>ASD is prevalent among older adults, leading to significant pain and disability. Surgical intervention, although increasingly popular, is associated with complications, high costs, and uncertain long-term outcomes beyond 2 years. Mechanical failure and alignment loss often necessitate revision surgeries, but the natural progression of spinal alignment postsurgery without complications remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and radiological data were analyzed from surgical patients in a multicenter ASD registry who maintained alignment within the instrumented region and completed a 5-year follow-up. The study evaluated patient demographics, surgical details, radiological parameters, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Subanalyses were conducted to compare patients with different initial postoperative alignments and fixation levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 79 patients (83.5% women, average age 61.9 y) with a mean of 10.7 fused levels. Of these, 29.1% underwent 3-column osteotomies (3CO), and 88.6% had a posterior-only approach. Although 65% showed favorable alignment at 6 weeks postsurgery, there was a progressive deterioration in global sagittal alignment (Global Tilt/RSA) and thoracic kyphosis over 5 years ( P <0.05), along with increased pelvic compensation (PT SS/RPV). These changes did not correlate with worsening health-related quality-of-life outcomes ( P >0.05). Older age was linked to greater progression in T2-T12 kyphosis, and osteoporosis was associated with increased SVA and RPV. Optimal immediate postoperative sagittal alignment did not prevent this \"aging effect.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ASD surgery and achieving ideal postoperative alignment do not prevent the ongoing \"aging\" of the noninstrumented spine. Both thoracic and global sagittal alignments deteriorate over time. Although no functional decline has been observed, the implications of these changes for surgical planning remain uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"909-915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) registry.

Objective: Assess whether spinal alignment deteriorates postsurgery in the absence of mechanical complications and evaluate the long-term outcomes of ASD surgery over a 5-year period.

Summary of background data: ASD is prevalent among older adults, leading to significant pain and disability. Surgical intervention, although increasingly popular, is associated with complications, high costs, and uncertain long-term outcomes beyond 2 years. Mechanical failure and alignment loss often necessitate revision surgeries, but the natural progression of spinal alignment postsurgery without complications remains unclear.

Methods: Clinical and radiological data were analyzed from surgical patients in a multicenter ASD registry who maintained alignment within the instrumented region and completed a 5-year follow-up. The study evaluated patient demographics, surgical details, radiological parameters, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Subanalyses were conducted to compare patients with different initial postoperative alignments and fixation levels.

Results: The study included 79 patients (83.5% women, average age 61.9 y) with a mean of 10.7 fused levels. Of these, 29.1% underwent 3-column osteotomies (3CO), and 88.6% had a posterior-only approach. Although 65% showed favorable alignment at 6 weeks postsurgery, there was a progressive deterioration in global sagittal alignment (Global Tilt/RSA) and thoracic kyphosis over 5 years ( P <0.05), along with increased pelvic compensation (PT SS/RPV). These changes did not correlate with worsening health-related quality-of-life outcomes ( P >0.05). Older age was linked to greater progression in T2-T12 kyphosis, and osteoporosis was associated with increased SVA and RPV. Optimal immediate postoperative sagittal alignment did not prevent this "aging effect."

Conclusions: ASD surgery and achieving ideal postoperative alignment do not prevent the ongoing "aging" of the noninstrumented spine. Both thoracic and global sagittal alignments deteriorate over time. Although no functional decline has been observed, the implications of these changes for surgical planning remain uncertain.

在没有机械并发症的情况下,ASD 手术后的长期对位丧失:脊柱老化?
研究设计:对前瞻性多中心成人脊柱畸形(ASD)登记进行回顾性分析:目的:评估在无机械并发症的情况下,手术后脊柱排列是否会恶化,并评估ASD手术五年内的长期疗效:ASD在老年人中很普遍,会导致严重的疼痛和残疾。手术干预虽然越来越流行,但与并发症、高成本和两年后的长期疗效不确定有关。由于机械故障和对位丧失,往往需要进行翻修手术,但手术后脊柱对位的自然进展是否无并发症仍不清楚:研究分析了多中心 ASD 登记的手术患者的临床和放射学数据,这些患者在器械植入区域内保持了对齐,并完成了 5 年的随访。研究评估了患者的人口统计学特征、手术细节、放射学参数和生活质量(QoL)结果。对不同术后初始对位和固定水平的患者进行了子分析比较:研究共纳入79名患者(83.5%为女性,平均年龄61.9岁),平均融合水平为10.7。其中,29.1%的患者接受了三柱截骨术(3CO),88.6%的患者采用了纯后路方法。虽然65%的患者在术后6周时显示出良好的对位,但在五年内,总体矢状对位(总体倾斜/RSA)和胸椎后凸的情况逐渐恶化(P0.05)。年龄越大,T2-T12椎体后凸的恶化程度越大,而骨质疏松症则与SVA和RPV的增加有关。术后立即进行理想的矢状对位并不能防止这种 "衰老效应":ASD手术和实现理想的术后对位并不能防止无器械脊柱的持续 "老化"。随着时间的推移,胸椎和整体矢状排列都会恶化。虽然没有观察到功能下降,但这些变化对手术规划的影响仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信