Different Risk Factors Between Bony and Ligamentous Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion to Pelvis for Adult Spinal Deformity.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005151
Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee
{"title":"Different Risk Factors Between Bony and Ligamentous Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion to Pelvis for Adult Spinal Deformity.","authors":"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risk factors for bony proximal junctional failure (B-PJF) and ligamentous PJF (L-PJF) separately after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Despite numerous studies about the risk factors of PJF, it remains unclear whether the same risk factors can be applied to both B-PJF and L-PJF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent corrective surgery from low thoracic level (T9-T12) to pelvis with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years were included in this study. Patients with PJF were divided into 2 groups according to the involvement of bony structure: B-PJF and L-PJF. The control group was created using patients who did not develop PJF for ≥2 years postoperatively (no-PJF group). Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters between no PJF versus B-PJF group and between no PJF versus L-PJF groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study cohort comprised 240 patients. The mean age was 68.7 years, and there were 205 women (85.4%). On average, 8.1 levels were fused. PJF developed in 103 patients, with 70 (68.0%) in the B-PJF group and 33 (32.0%) in the L-PJF group. Stepwise logistic regression analyses revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.088), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.161), osteoporosis (OR=3.293), greater postoperative lumbar distribution index (OR=1.032), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (OR=3.964) were significant risk factors for B-PJF. Meanwhile, no use of a transverse process (TP) hook was the single risk factor for L-PJF (OR=4.724).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the difference in risk factors between B-PJF and L-PJF will facilitate the optimization of surgical outcomes for patients with ASD. Appropriate correction of sagittal malalignment along with the use of a TP hook is advisable to mitigate both B-PJF and L-PJF development.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1065-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objective: To analyze the risk factors for bony proximal junctional failure (B-PJF) and ligamentous PJF (L-PJF) separately after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

Summary of background data: Despite numerous studies about the risk factors of PJF, it remains unclear whether the same risk factors can be applied to both B-PJF and L-PJF.

Methods: Patients who underwent corrective surgery from low thoracic level (T9-T12) to pelvis with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years were included in this study. Patients with PJF were divided into 2 groups according to the involvement of bony structure: B-PJF and L-PJF. The control group was created using patients who did not develop PJF for ≥2 years postoperatively (no-PJF group). Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters between no PJF versus B-PJF group and between no PJF versus L-PJF groups.

Results: The final study cohort comprised 240 patients. The mean age was 68.7 years, and there were 205 women (85.4%). On average, 8.1 levels were fused. PJF developed in 103 patients, with 70 (68.0%) in the B-PJF group and 33 (32.0%) in the L-PJF group. Stepwise logistic regression analyses revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.088), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.161), osteoporosis (OR=3.293), greater postoperative lumbar distribution index (OR=1.032), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (OR=3.964) were significant risk factors for B-PJF. Meanwhile, no use of a transverse process (TP) hook was the single risk factor for L-PJF (OR=4.724).

Conclusions: Understanding the difference in risk factors between B-PJF and L-PJF will facilitate the optimization of surgical outcomes for patients with ASD. Appropriate correction of sagittal malalignment along with the use of a TP hook is advisable to mitigate both B-PJF and L-PJF development.

因成人脊柱畸形而接受胸腰椎骨盆融合术的患者骨性和韧带近端连接失败的不同风险因素
研究设计回顾性研究:分别分析成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术后骨性近端连接失败(B-PJF)和韧带性PJF(L-PJF)的风险因素:背景数据摘要:尽管对PJF的风险因素进行了大量研究,但仍不清楚相同的风险因素是否可同时适用于B-PJF和L-PJF:本研究纳入了从低胸椎水平(T9-T12)到骨盆接受矫正手术且随访时间至少两年的患者。根据骨结构受累情况,PJF 患者被分为两组:B-PJF组和L-PJF组。对照组为术后≥2 年未发生 PJF 的患者(无 PJF 组)。通过比较无PJF组与B-PJF组之间以及无PJF组与L-PJF组之间的各种临床和影像学参数来分析风险因素:最终研究队列由 240 名患者组成。平均年龄为 68.7 岁,其中女性 205 人(85.4%)。平均融合了 8.1 个层次。103名患者发生了PJF,其中B-PJF组70人(68.0%),L-PJF组33人(32.0%)。逐步逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较大(几率比[OR]=1.088)、体重指数(BMI)较高(OR=1.161)、骨质疏松症(OR=3.293)、术后腰椎分布指数较大(OR=1.032)以及相对于年龄调整后骨盆发生率-腰椎前凸的过度矫正(OR=3.964)是导致 B-PJF 的重要风险因素。同时,不使用横突(TP)钩是导致 L-PJF 的唯一风险因素(OR=4.724):了解 B-PJF 和 L-PJF 的风险因素差异将有助于优化 ASD 患者的手术效果。适当矫正矢状面错位并使用TP钩可减轻B-PJF和L-PJF的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信