Impact of frailty on mortality and transfer to hemodialysis after peritoneal dialysis initiation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sophie Gaube, David Clark, Dylan Cooper, Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette, Amanda Vinson, Karthik Tennankore
{"title":"Impact of frailty on mortality and transfer to hemodialysis after peritoneal dialysis initiation.","authors":"Sophie Gaube, David Clark, Dylan Cooper, Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette, Amanda Vinson, Karthik Tennankore","doi":"10.1177/08968608241274095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is associated with poor outcomes for patients on dialysis; however, dedicated studies among incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are lacking. This study aims to determine the association between frailty and mortality/transfer to hemodialysis (HD) among incident PD patients and identify whether dialysis modality (PD vs. HD) modifies the association of frailty and mortality following dialysis initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective cohort of incident PD and HD patients was analyzed from 2009 to 2020 (last follow-up December 2021). The first version of the clinical frailty scale (CFS) ranging from 1, very fit, to 7, severely frail, was used to characterize patient frailty at dialysis initiation. Time to death/transfer to HD was analyzed using multivariable Cox Survival analyses. Patients were censored at transplant/last follow-up. Dialysis modality was evaluated as a potential effect modifier on the impact of frailty on mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 253 patients who initiated PD, 182 had completed CFS scores. Mean age at dialysis initiation was 63 ± 13 years and mean CFS score was 3 ± 1. There were 42 deaths and 69 instances of transfer to HD over 379 patient-years at risk. Vulnerable/frail patients (CFS ≥ 4) had a two-fold increase in the adjusted relative hazard for death/transfer to HD (HR 2.04, 95% CI [1.10-3.77]). Incident dialysis modality did not modify the association between frailty and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher severity of frailty at PD initiation is associated with both mortality/transfer to HD and mortality alone, and the association between frailty and mortality is not modified by dialysis modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241274095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty is associated with poor outcomes for patients on dialysis; however, dedicated studies among incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are lacking. This study aims to determine the association between frailty and mortality/transfer to hemodialysis (HD) among incident PD patients and identify whether dialysis modality (PD vs. HD) modifies the association of frailty and mortality following dialysis initiation.

Methods: A single center retrospective cohort of incident PD and HD patients was analyzed from 2009 to 2020 (last follow-up December 2021). The first version of the clinical frailty scale (CFS) ranging from 1, very fit, to 7, severely frail, was used to characterize patient frailty at dialysis initiation. Time to death/transfer to HD was analyzed using multivariable Cox Survival analyses. Patients were censored at transplant/last follow-up. Dialysis modality was evaluated as a potential effect modifier on the impact of frailty on mortality.

Results: Of 253 patients who initiated PD, 182 had completed CFS scores. Mean age at dialysis initiation was 63 ± 13 years and mean CFS score was 3 ± 1. There were 42 deaths and 69 instances of transfer to HD over 379 patient-years at risk. Vulnerable/frail patients (CFS ≥ 4) had a two-fold increase in the adjusted relative hazard for death/transfer to HD (HR 2.04, 95% CI [1.10-3.77]). Incident dialysis modality did not modify the association between frailty and mortality.

Conclusions: A higher severity of frailty at PD initiation is associated with both mortality/transfer to HD and mortality alone, and the association between frailty and mortality is not modified by dialysis modality.

虚弱对腹膜透析后死亡率和转入血液透析的影响。
背景:虚弱与透析患者的不良预后有关;然而,目前还缺乏针对腹膜透析(PD)患者的专门研究。本研究旨在确定腹膜透析患者体弱与死亡率/转为血液透析(HD)之间的关系,并确定透析方式(腹膜透析与血液透析)是否会改变体弱与开始透析后死亡率之间的关系:方法:对 2009 年至 2020 年(最后一次随访时间为 2021 年 12 月)期间发生的 PD 和 HD 患者的单中心回顾性队列进行了分析。第一版临床虚弱量表(CFS)的范围从1(非常健康)到7(严重虚弱),用于描述患者开始透析时的虚弱程度。采用多变量 Cox 生存分析法对死亡/转入 HD 的时间进行分析。患者在移植/最后一次随访时被剔除。透析方式被评估为虚弱对死亡率影响的潜在效应调节因素:在253名开始透析的患者中,182人完成了CFS评分。开始透析时的平均年龄为 63 ± 13 岁,平均 CFS 评分为 3 ± 1 分。在379个风险患者年中,有42人死亡,69人转入血液透析。弱势/虚弱患者(CFS ≥ 4)的死亡/转入 HD 的调整相对危险度增加了两倍(HR 2.04,95% CI [1.10-3.77])。透析方式不会改变虚弱与死亡率之间的关系:结论:在开始使用腹膜透析时,虚弱程度越严重,死亡率/转入 HD 和单纯死亡率越高,而透析方式不会改变虚弱与死亡率之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信