Therapeutic challenges in temporomandibular disorders.

Q2 Medicine
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.15386/mpr-2687
Smaranda Buduru, Oana Almăşan, Daniela Condor, Manuela Tăut, Anca Mesaroş, Manuela Manziuc, Andreea Kui
{"title":"Therapeutic challenges in temporomandibular disorders.","authors":"Smaranda Buduru, Oana Almăşan, Daniela Condor, Manuela Tăut, Anca Mesaroş, Manuela Manziuc, Andreea Kui","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed at evaluating the etiology and treatment challenges of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>160 subjects with TMDs, 38 males (23.8%) and 122 females (76.3%) were studied. A personalized coefficient was designated, which included the resolution of the main symptom, correction of secondary symptoms, patient collaboration (emotional parameter), treatment duration, and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent cause for consultation was muscle impairment (42.5%), or limitation of mouth opening, followed by joint impairment (23.1%). Muscle pain was noticed, particularly in the masseter (57.5%) and lateral pterygoid muscles (51.9%). Tooth pain or gingival retraction was frequently associated with tooth wear (48.1%) and dental abfraction (31.3%). Remote symptomatology was dominated by otologic symptomatology. Iatrogenic etiology was highest (69.4%), followed by untreated missing teeth (66.9%). Treatment options included muscle relaxation, occlusal balancing (equilibration), kinesitherapy, medication, and swallowing re-education. Most patients benefited from four to seven different types of therapy, which resulted in a higher cost and a longer and more uncomfortable treatment. The primary symptom was relieved in 82.3% of cases, with recurrence occurring in 15.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is time-consuming, demanding, and intricate. Most patients required four to seven different types of therapy, which increased the expense, treatment duration, and suffering.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"97 3","pages":"357-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study aimed at evaluating the etiology and treatment challenges of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

Methods: 160 subjects with TMDs, 38 males (23.8%) and 122 females (76.3%) were studied. A personalized coefficient was designated, which included the resolution of the main symptom, correction of secondary symptoms, patient collaboration (emotional parameter), treatment duration, and cost.

Results: The most frequent cause for consultation was muscle impairment (42.5%), or limitation of mouth opening, followed by joint impairment (23.1%). Muscle pain was noticed, particularly in the masseter (57.5%) and lateral pterygoid muscles (51.9%). Tooth pain or gingival retraction was frequently associated with tooth wear (48.1%) and dental abfraction (31.3%). Remote symptomatology was dominated by otologic symptomatology. Iatrogenic etiology was highest (69.4%), followed by untreated missing teeth (66.9%). Treatment options included muscle relaxation, occlusal balancing (equilibration), kinesitherapy, medication, and swallowing re-education. Most patients benefited from four to seven different types of therapy, which resulted in a higher cost and a longer and more uncomfortable treatment. The primary symptom was relieved in 82.3% of cases, with recurrence occurring in 15.7%.

Conclusion: The treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is time-consuming, demanding, and intricate. Most patients required four to seven different types of therapy, which increased the expense, treatment duration, and suffering.

颞下颌关节紊乱症的治疗难题。
背景与目的本研究旨在评估颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)的病因和治疗难题。方法:研究对象为160名TMDs患者,其中男性38名(23.8%),女性122名(76.3%)。指定了一个个性化系数,其中包括主要症状的缓解、次要症状的纠正、患者合作(情感参数)、治疗时间和费用:最常见的就诊原因是肌肉损伤(42.5%)或张口受限,其次是关节损伤(23.1%)。人们注意到肌肉疼痛,尤其是肌肉肿块(57.5%)和翼外侧肌肉(51.9%)。牙齿疼痛或牙龈萎缩通常与牙齿磨损(48.1%)和牙齿折叠(31.3%)有关。远期症状以耳科症状为主。先天性病因最多(69.4%),其次是未经治疗的缺牙(66.9%)。治疗方法包括肌肉放松、咬合平衡(平衡)、运动疗法、药物治疗和吞咽再教育。大多数患者都从四到七种不同的疗法中获益,这导致了较高的费用以及较长和较不舒适的治疗时间。82.3%的病例主要症状得到缓解,15.7%的病例复发:结论:颞下颌关节功能障碍的治疗耗时长、要求高且复杂。大多数患者需要四到七种不同的治疗方法,这增加了费用、治疗时间和痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信