Impact of assessing the emotional health status in the management of cancer patients.

Q2 Medicine
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.15386/mpr-2770
Liliana Policiuc, Cecilia Bica, Diana Gulei, Daniel Corneliu Leucuta, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
{"title":"Impact of assessing the emotional health status in the management of cancer patients.","authors":"Liliana Policiuc, Cecilia Bica, Diana Gulei, Daniel Corneliu Leucuta, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study explores the impact of emotional health on cancer patients, acknowledging the controversies and lack of high-quality data in the field, particularly for rare cancers and younger patients. It highlights the significant prevalence of depression and anxiety among cancer patients, the inadequacies in addressing mental health during and after treatment, and the inconsistencies in prevalence rates due to varying study methodologies. This study unravels the importance of data regarding mental health status in a clinical dataset to accompany the biological sample to be included in a biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a questionnaire to evaluate the opinions of cancer patients, clinicians, and researchers regarding the inclusion of mental health data in clinical datasets accompanying biological samples in biobanks. The study involved 120 participants (40 from each group), and the data were analyzed using statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found significant differences in the perceived importance of including mental health information among the three groups. Patients showed a higher tendency (87.9%) to consider mental health questions relevant compared to researchers (72.08%) and clinicians (62.08%). The first four questions regarding emotional well-being received the highest positive responses, particularly from patients (94.3%). The findings underline the importance of addressing the mental health of cancer patients, which is often overlooked. The study emphasizes the necessity for integrating mental health data in biobanks and increasing psychological support for cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are clear differences in how patients, researchers, and clinicians value emotional and psychological aspects. The study underscores the need for better education on modern medical practices and the benefits of comprehensive patient care, including mental health considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"97 3","pages":"308-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study explores the impact of emotional health on cancer patients, acknowledging the controversies and lack of high-quality data in the field, particularly for rare cancers and younger patients. It highlights the significant prevalence of depression and anxiety among cancer patients, the inadequacies in addressing mental health during and after treatment, and the inconsistencies in prevalence rates due to varying study methodologies. This study unravels the importance of data regarding mental health status in a clinical dataset to accompany the biological sample to be included in a biobank.

Methods: The study utilized a questionnaire to evaluate the opinions of cancer patients, clinicians, and researchers regarding the inclusion of mental health data in clinical datasets accompanying biological samples in biobanks. The study involved 120 participants (40 from each group), and the data were analyzed using statistical methods.

Results: The study found significant differences in the perceived importance of including mental health information among the three groups. Patients showed a higher tendency (87.9%) to consider mental health questions relevant compared to researchers (72.08%) and clinicians (62.08%). The first four questions regarding emotional well-being received the highest positive responses, particularly from patients (94.3%). The findings underline the importance of addressing the mental health of cancer patients, which is often overlooked. The study emphasizes the necessity for integrating mental health data in biobanks and increasing psychological support for cancer patients.

Conclusions: There are clear differences in how patients, researchers, and clinicians value emotional and psychological aspects. The study underscores the need for better education on modern medical practices and the benefits of comprehensive patient care, including mental health considerations.

评估情绪健康状况对癌症患者管理的影响。
背景和目的:本研究探讨了情绪健康对癌症患者的影响,承认该领域存在争议且缺乏高质量的数据,尤其是对罕见癌症和年轻患者而言。它强调了抑郁症和焦虑症在癌症患者中的显著患病率、在治疗期间和治疗后心理健康方面的不足,以及因研究方法不同而导致的患病率不一致。本研究揭示了心理健康状况数据在临床数据集中的重要性,这些数据将与生物样本一起纳入生物库:本研究采用问卷调查的方式,评估癌症患者、临床医生和研究人员对将心理健康数据纳入生物库生物样本的临床数据集的看法。研究涉及 120 名参与者(每组 40 人),数据采用统计方法进行分析:研究发现,三组参与者对纳入心理健康信息重要性的认知存在明显差异。与研究人员(72.08%)和临床医生(62.08%)相比,患者(87.9%)更倾向于认为心理健康问题具有相关性。有关情绪健康的前四个问题得到了最积极的回应,尤其是患者(94.3%)。研究结果凸显了解决癌症患者心理健康问题的重要性,而这一问题往往被忽视。研究强调,有必要将心理健康数据纳入生物库,并增加对癌症患者的心理支持:结论:患者、研究人员和临床医生对情感和心理方面的重视程度存在明显差异。这项研究强调,有必要更好地开展现代医疗实践教育,让患者了解全面护理的益处,包括心理健康方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信