Off- and On-Bike Resistance Training in Cyclists: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
David Barranco-Gil, Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte, Víctor Rodríguez-Rielves, Jon Iriberri, Alejandro Martínez-Cava, Ángel Buendía-Romero, Lidia B Alejo, Francisco Franco-Lopez, Iván R Sanchez-Redondo, Raúl DE Pablos, Alejandro Lucia, Pedro L Valenzuela, Jesús G Pallares
{"title":"Off- and On-Bike Resistance Training in Cyclists: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"David Barranco-Gil, Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte, Víctor Rodríguez-Rielves, Jon Iriberri, Alejandro Martínez-Cava, Ángel Buendía-Romero, Lidia B Alejo, Francisco Franco-Lopez, Iván R Sanchez-Redondo, Raúl DE Pablos, Alejandro Lucia, Pedro L Valenzuela, Jesús G Pallares","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the effects of off- and on-bike resistance training (RT) on endurance cycling performance as well as muscle strength, power, and structure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Well-trained male cyclists were randomly assigned to incorporate two sessions/week of off-bike (full squats, n = 12) or on-bike (all-out efforts performed against very high resistances and thus at very low cadences, n = 12) RT during 10 wk, with all RT-related variables (number of sessions, sets, and repetitions, duration of recovery periods, and relative loads [70% of one-repetition maximum]) matched between the two groups. A third, control group ( n = 13), did not receive any RT stimulus, but all groups completed a cycling training regime of the same volume and intensity. Outcomes included maximum oxygen uptake (V̇O 2max ), off-bike muscle strength (full squat) and on-bike (\"pedaling\") muscle strength, and peak power capacity (Wingate test), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-determined body composition (muscle/fat mass), and muscle structure (cross-sectional area, pennation angle).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant within/between-group effect was found for V̇O 2max . Both the off-bike (mean Δ = 2.6%-5.8%) and on-bike (4.5%-7.3%) RT groups increased squat and pedaling-specific strength parameters after the intervention compared with the control group (-5.8% to -3.9%) ( P < 0.05) with no significant differences between them. The two RT groups also increased Wingate performance (4.1% and 4.3%, respectively, vs -4.9% in the control group, P ≤ 0.018), with similar results for muscle cross-sectional area (2.5% and 2.2%, vs -2.3% in the control group, P ≤ 0.008). No significant within/between-group effect was found for body composition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new proposed on-bike RT could be an effective alternative to conventional off-bike RT training for improving overall and pedaling-specific muscle strength, power, and muscle mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"296-304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the effects of off- and on-bike resistance training (RT) on endurance cycling performance as well as muscle strength, power, and structure.

Methods: Well-trained male cyclists were randomly assigned to incorporate two sessions/week of off-bike (full squats, n = 12) or on-bike (all-out efforts performed against very high resistances and thus at very low cadences, n = 12) RT during 10 wk, with all RT-related variables (number of sessions, sets, and repetitions, duration of recovery periods, and relative loads [70% of one-repetition maximum]) matched between the two groups. A third, control group ( n = 13), did not receive any RT stimulus, but all groups completed a cycling training regime of the same volume and intensity. Outcomes included maximum oxygen uptake (V̇O 2max ), off-bike muscle strength (full squat) and on-bike ("pedaling") muscle strength, and peak power capacity (Wingate test), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-determined body composition (muscle/fat mass), and muscle structure (cross-sectional area, pennation angle).

Results: No significant within/between-group effect was found for V̇O 2max . Both the off-bike (mean Δ = 2.6%-5.8%) and on-bike (4.5%-7.3%) RT groups increased squat and pedaling-specific strength parameters after the intervention compared with the control group (-5.8% to -3.9%) ( P < 0.05) with no significant differences between them. The two RT groups also increased Wingate performance (4.1% and 4.3%, respectively, vs -4.9% in the control group, P ≤ 0.018), with similar results for muscle cross-sectional area (2.5% and 2.2%, vs -2.3% in the control group, P ≤ 0.008). No significant within/between-group effect was found for body composition.

Conclusions: The new proposed on-bike RT could be an effective alternative to conventional off-bike RT training for improving overall and pedaling-specific muscle strength, power, and muscle mass.

自行车运动员的车外和车内阻力训练:随机对照试验
目的:本研究比较了下车阻力训练(RT)和骑车阻力训练(RT)对自行车耐力表现以及肌肉力量、功率和结构的影响:随机分配训练有素的男性自行车运动员在 10 周内接受每周两次的自行车外阻力训练(全蹲,n = 12)或自行车上阻力训练(在非常大的阻力下全力以赴,从而以非常低的步频进行训练,n = 12),两组间所有与阻力训练相关的变量[训练次数、组数和重复次数、恢复期持续时间和相对负荷(一次重复最大值的 70%)]均相匹配。第三组为对照组(n = 13),不接受任何 RT 刺激,但所有小组都完成了相同运动量和强度的自行车训练。结果包括最大摄氧量(V.M.O.Max)、自行车外肌肉力量(全蹲)和自行车上("踩踏")肌肉力量和峰值功率容量(Wingate 测试)、双能量 X 射线吸收测定法确定的身体成分(肌肉/脂肪质量)和肌肉结构(横截面积、五角形角):结果:在最大氧饱和度方面,没有发现明显的组内/组间效应。与对照组(-5.8--3.9%)相比(P<0.05),离地(平均Δ=2.6-5.8%)和骑车(4.5-7.3%)RT组在干预后的深蹲和蹬车专项力量参数均有所提高(P<0.05),组间差异不显著。两个 RT 组还提高了 Wingate 性能(分别为 4.1%和 4.3%,对照组为-4.9%,P ≤ 0.018),肌肉横截面积的结果类似(分别为 2.5%和 2.2%,对照组为-2.3%,P ≤ 0.008)。在身体成分方面,没有发现明显的组内/组间效应。结论新提出的自行车上 RT 可以有效替代传统的非自行车上 RT 训练,以提高整体和踏板特定肌肉的力量、功率和肌肉质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信