Evaluating the Alignment of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Recommendations With Clinical Guidelines Focused on Soft Tissue Tumors.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Masatake Matsuoka, Tomohiro Onodera, Ryuichi Fukuda, Koji Iwasaki, Masanari Hamasaki, Taku Ebata, Yoshiaki Hosokawa, Eiji Kondo, Norimasa Iwasaki
{"title":"Evaluating the Alignment of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Recommendations With Clinical Guidelines Focused on Soft Tissue Tumors.","authors":"Masatake Matsuoka, Tomohiro Onodera, Ryuichi Fukuda, Koji Iwasaki, Masanari Hamasaki, Taku Ebata, Yoshiaki Hosokawa, Eiji Kondo, Norimasa Iwasaki","doi":"10.1002/jso.27874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly, in oncology, has significantly shifted the paradigms of medical diagnostics and treatment planning. However, the utility of AI, specifically OpenAI's ChatGPT, in soft tissue sarcoma treatment, remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated ChatGPT's alignment with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of soft tissue tumors 2020. Twenty-two clinical questions (CQs) were formulated to encompass various aspects of sarcoma diagnosis, treatment, and management. ChatGPT's responses were classified into \"Complete Alignment,\" \"Partial Alignment,\" or \"Nonalignment\" based on the recommendation and strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT demonstrated an 86% alignment rate with the JOA guidelines. The AI provided two instances of complete alignment and 17 instances of partial alignment, indicating a strong capability to match guideline criteria for most questions. However, three discrepancies were identified in areas concerning the treatment of atypical lipomatous tumors, perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma, and treatment strategies for elderly patients with malignant soft tissue tumors. Reassessment with guideline input led to some adjustments, revealing both the potential and limitations of AI in complex sarcoma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that AI, specifically ChatGPT, can align with clinical guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma treatment. It also underscores the need for continuous refinement and cautious integration of AI in medical decision-making, particularly in the context of treatment for soft tissue sarcoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly, in oncology, has significantly shifted the paradigms of medical diagnostics and treatment planning. However, the utility of AI, specifically OpenAI's ChatGPT, in soft tissue sarcoma treatment, remains unclear.

Methods: We evaluated ChatGPT's alignment with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of soft tissue tumors 2020. Twenty-two clinical questions (CQs) were formulated to encompass various aspects of sarcoma diagnosis, treatment, and management. ChatGPT's responses were classified into "Complete Alignment," "Partial Alignment," or "Nonalignment" based on the recommendation and strength of evidence.

Results: ChatGPT demonstrated an 86% alignment rate with the JOA guidelines. The AI provided two instances of complete alignment and 17 instances of partial alignment, indicating a strong capability to match guideline criteria for most questions. However, three discrepancies were identified in areas concerning the treatment of atypical lipomatous tumors, perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma, and treatment strategies for elderly patients with malignant soft tissue tumors. Reassessment with guideline input led to some adjustments, revealing both the potential and limitations of AI in complex sarcoma care.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that AI, specifically ChatGPT, can align with clinical guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma treatment. It also underscores the need for continuous refinement and cautious integration of AI in medical decision-making, particularly in the context of treatment for soft tissue sarcoma.

评估人工智能生成的建议与以软组织肿瘤为重点的临床指南的一致性。
背景:人工智能(AI)的应用,尤其是在肿瘤学领域的应用,极大地改变了医疗诊断和治疗计划的模式。然而,人工智能(尤其是 OpenAI 的 ChatGPT)在软组织肉瘤治疗中的实用性仍不明确:我们评估了 ChatGPT 与日本骨科协会(JOA)2020 年软组织肿瘤管理临床实践指南的一致性。我们制定了 22 个临床问题(CQ),涵盖了肉瘤诊断、治疗和管理的各个方面。根据推荐和证据强度,将 ChatGPT 的回答分为 "完全一致"、"部分一致 "或 "不一致":结果:ChatGPT 与 JOA 指南的吻合率为 86%。人工智能提供了 2 个完全吻合的实例和 17 个部分吻合的实例,表明其在大多数问题上都有很强的能力与指南标准相匹配。不过,在非典型脂肪瘤的治疗、滑膜肉瘤的围手术期化疗以及老年恶性软组织肿瘤患者的治疗策略等方面发现了三处差异。根据指南意见进行的重新评估导致了一些调整,揭示了人工智能在复杂肉瘤治疗中的潜力和局限性:我们的研究表明,人工智能(特别是 ChatGPT)可以与软组织肉瘤治疗的临床指南保持一致。结论:我们的研究表明,人工智能(尤其是 ChatGPT)可以与软组织肉瘤治疗的临床指南保持一致,同时也强调了在医疗决策中不断完善和谨慎整合人工智能的必要性,尤其是在软组织肉瘤的治疗中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信