Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Elasma Milanzi, Rachel M Pelly, Ian P Hayes, Peter Gibbs, Ian Faragher, Jeanette C Reece
{"title":"Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery.","authors":"Elasma Milanzi, Rachel M Pelly, Ian P Hayes, Peter Gibbs, Ian Faragher, Jeanette C Reece","doi":"10.1002/jso.27852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (κ = 0.33) versus N-staging (κ = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.

Results: Overall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (κ = 0.33) versus N-staging (κ = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).

Conclusion: MRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.

对直接进行手术的直肠癌患者进行基线磁共振成像分期的准确性
背景和目的:高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)对直肠癌术前分期的准确性在不同研究中存在差异。我们在澳大利亚一个未接受新辅助治疗或放射治疗的大型队列中,研究了磁共振成像对直肠癌 T 型和 N 型分期的准确性,并与切除标本的最终组织病理学进行了比较:回顾性分析前瞻性收集的临床数据,这些数据来自2012年1月至2019年12月期间通过高分辨率磁共振成像进行局部分期的153例直肠腺癌,术前未接受放化疗。采用 Kappa 统计学评估 MRI 与最终组织病理学之间的 T 期和 N 期一致性。采用对数线性模型评估每个T期的一致性。使用阳性和阴性预测值检查N分期的准确性:结果:核磁共振成像与最终组织病理学对T分期和N分期的总体一致性分别为55%和65%。Kappa统计发现,MRI与最终组织病理学的T分期(κ = 0.33)与N分期(κ = 0.18)的一致性更高。磁共振成像正确评估了91%的T1肿瘤、43%的T2肿瘤、65%的T3肿瘤和80%的T4肿瘤。N阴性肿瘤的磁共振成像准确率(74.1%)高于N阳性肿瘤(44.4%):结论:磁共振成像对T1、T3和T4直肠肿瘤分期的准确性一般,但将肿瘤分期为T2时应谨慎。N阴性与N阳性肿瘤的分期准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信