Dietary-Based Diabetes Risk Score and breast cancer: a prospective evaluation in the SUN project.

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Inmaculada Aguilera-Buenosvinos, Miguel A Martínez-González, Andrea Romanos-Nanclares, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Carlos E de Andrea, Ligia J Domínguez, Estefania Toledo
{"title":"Dietary-Based Diabetes Risk Score and breast cancer: a prospective evaluation in the SUN project.","authors":"Inmaculada Aguilera-Buenosvinos, Miguel A Martínez-González, Andrea Romanos-Nanclares, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Carlos E de Andrea, Ligia J Domínguez, Estefania Toledo","doi":"10.1007/s13105-024-01036-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and breast cancer risk has been reported. This association can be potentially explained by alteration of the insulin/IGF system. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively investigate whether a previously reported Dietary-Based Diabetes Risk Score (DDS) inversely associated with T2D was also associated with breast cancer risk in the SUN (\"Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra\") cohort. We followed up 10,810 women (mean age = 35 years, SD = 11 years) for an average of 12.5 years during which 147 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed. A validated 136-item FFQ was administered at baseline and after 10 years of follow-up. The DDS (range: 11 to 55 points) positively weighted vegetables, fruit, whole cereals, nuts, coffee, low-fat dairy, fiber, PUFA; while it negatively weighted red meat, processed meats, and sugar-sweetened beverages. The DDS was categorized into tertiles. Self-reported medically diagnosed breast cancer cases were confirmed through medical records. We found a significant inverse association between the intermediate tertile of the DDS score and overall breast cancer risk (Hazard ratio, HR<sub>T2 vs. T1</sub>= 0.55; 95% CI: 0.36-0.82) and premenopausal breast cancer risk (HR<sub>T2</sub>= 0.26; 95% CI: 0.13-0.53), but not for the highest tertile. This association was stronger among women with a BMI < 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p<sub>interaction</sub>: 0.029). In conclusion, moderate adherence to the DDS score was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer, especially among premenopausal women and women with a lower BMI. These findings underscore the importance of antidiabetic diet in reducing the risk of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physiology and biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physiology and biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-024-01036-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and breast cancer risk has been reported. This association can be potentially explained by alteration of the insulin/IGF system. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively investigate whether a previously reported Dietary-Based Diabetes Risk Score (DDS) inversely associated with T2D was also associated with breast cancer risk in the SUN ("Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra") cohort. We followed up 10,810 women (mean age = 35 years, SD = 11 years) for an average of 12.5 years during which 147 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed. A validated 136-item FFQ was administered at baseline and after 10 years of follow-up. The DDS (range: 11 to 55 points) positively weighted vegetables, fruit, whole cereals, nuts, coffee, low-fat dairy, fiber, PUFA; while it negatively weighted red meat, processed meats, and sugar-sweetened beverages. The DDS was categorized into tertiles. Self-reported medically diagnosed breast cancer cases were confirmed through medical records. We found a significant inverse association between the intermediate tertile of the DDS score and overall breast cancer risk (Hazard ratio, HRT2 vs. T1= 0.55; 95% CI: 0.36-0.82) and premenopausal breast cancer risk (HRT2= 0.26; 95% CI: 0.13-0.53), but not for the highest tertile. This association was stronger among women with a BMI < 25 kg/m2 (pinteraction: 0.029). In conclusion, moderate adherence to the DDS score was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer, especially among premenopausal women and women with a lower BMI. These findings underscore the importance of antidiabetic diet in reducing the risk of breast cancer.

Abstract Image

基于饮食的糖尿病风险评分与乳腺癌:SUN 项目的前瞻性评估。
据报道,2 型糖尿病(T2D)与乳腺癌风险之间存在关联。胰岛素/IGF系统的改变可能是这种关联的潜在原因。因此,我们旨在对 SUN("Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra")队列中以前报道的与 T2D 成反比的饮食型糖尿病风险评分(DDS)是否也与乳腺癌风险有关进行前瞻性调查。我们对 10,810 名女性(平均年龄为 35 岁,SD=11 岁)进行了平均为期 12.5 年的随访,在此期间诊断出了 147 例新的浸润性乳腺癌病例。在基线和随访 10 年后,对 136 个项目的 FFQ 进行了验证。DDS(范围:11 至 55 分)对蔬菜、水果、全谷物食品、坚果、咖啡、低脂奶制品、纤维、多酚脂肪酸给予了积极的权重,而对红肉、加工肉类和含糖饮料给予了消极的权重。DDS 被分为三个等级。自我报告的医学诊断乳腺癌病例通过医疗记录得到确认。我们发现,DDS 评分的中间三分位数与总体乳腺癌风险(危险比,HRT2 vs. T1= 0.55;95% CI:0.36-0.82)和绝经前乳腺癌风险(HRT2= 0.26;95% CI:0.13-0.53)之间存在明显的反向关系,但与最高三分位数没有关系。在体重指数为 2 的妇女中,这种关联性更强(pinteraction:0.029)。总之,适度遵守 DDS 评分与较低的乳腺癌风险有关,尤其是在绝经前妇女和体重指数较低的妇女中。这些发现强调了抗糖尿病饮食对降低乳腺癌风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physiology and biochemistry
Journal of physiology and biochemistry 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry publishes original research articles and reviews describing relevant new observations on molecular, biochemical and cellular mechanisms involved in human physiology. All areas of the physiology are covered. Special emphasis is placed on the integration of those levels in the whole-organism. The Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry also welcomes articles on molecular nutrition and metabolism studies, and works related to the genomic or proteomic bases of the physiological functions. Descriptive manuscripts about physiological/biochemical processes or clinical manuscripts will not be considered. The journal will not accept manuscripts testing effects of animal or plant extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信