Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yunxiao Wang, Yulan Wang, Shimin Yu, Litian Han, Yi Feng, Richard J Miron, Qi Yan, Yufeng Zhang
{"title":"Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study.","authors":"Yunxiao Wang, Yulan Wang, Shimin Yu, Litian Han, Yi Feng, Richard J Miron, Qi Yan, Yufeng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05890-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the accuracy and effectiveness among operators with different levels of experience in a robot-assisted immediate implant surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included four participants who had received dental training at the same institution but have varying levels of clinical experience in implant dentistry, denoted as undergraduate student (UG), dental resident (DR), specialist with no robot experience (IS) and specialist with robot experience (RS). Following comprehensive theoretical training in robot-assisted implant operation, each operator participated in five robotic-assisted implant procedures at 21 sites, resulting in the implant surgery of a total of 20 implants. Subsequently, the accuracy of the implants was assessed by analyzing the preoperative planning and the postoperative CBCT scans, and the time required for each procedure was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Angular deviation in UG, DR, IS and RS group was 0.82 ± 0.27°, 0.55 ± 0.27°, 0.83 ± 0.27°, and 0.56 ± 0.36°, respectively. The total deviation of the implant platform point was 0.28 ± 0.10 mm, 0.26 ± 0.16 mm, 0.34 ± 0.08 mm and 0.31 ± 0.06 mm, respectively. The total deviation of the apical point was 0.30 ± 0.08 mm, 0.25 ± 0.18 mm, 0.31 ± 0.09 mm, and 0.31 ± 0.05 mm, respectively. The time spent was 10.37 ± 0.57 min, 10.56 ± 1.77 min, 9.93 ± 0.78 min, and 11.76 ± 0.78 min for each operator. As the number of operations increased, the operation time decreased, but there was no significant difference in implant accuracy between the different groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the scope of this study, robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrated high accuracy, with no significant differences in performance between operators with varying levels of clinical experience or implant robot-user experience. Furthermore, the learning curve for robotic implant surgery is steep and consistent.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrates consistent high accuracy across operators of varying clinical and robotic experience levels, highlighting its potential to standardize procedures and enhance predictability in clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05890-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the accuracy and effectiveness among operators with different levels of experience in a robot-assisted immediate implant surgery.

Materials and methods: The study included four participants who had received dental training at the same institution but have varying levels of clinical experience in implant dentistry, denoted as undergraduate student (UG), dental resident (DR), specialist with no robot experience (IS) and specialist with robot experience (RS). Following comprehensive theoretical training in robot-assisted implant operation, each operator participated in five robotic-assisted implant procedures at 21 sites, resulting in the implant surgery of a total of 20 implants. Subsequently, the accuracy of the implants was assessed by analyzing the preoperative planning and the postoperative CBCT scans, and the time required for each procedure was also recorded.

Results: Angular deviation in UG, DR, IS and RS group was 0.82 ± 0.27°, 0.55 ± 0.27°, 0.83 ± 0.27°, and 0.56 ± 0.36°, respectively. The total deviation of the implant platform point was 0.28 ± 0.10 mm, 0.26 ± 0.16 mm, 0.34 ± 0.08 mm and 0.31 ± 0.06 mm, respectively. The total deviation of the apical point was 0.30 ± 0.08 mm, 0.25 ± 0.18 mm, 0.31 ± 0.09 mm, and 0.31 ± 0.05 mm, respectively. The time spent was 10.37 ± 0.57 min, 10.56 ± 1.77 min, 9.93 ± 0.78 min, and 11.76 ± 0.78 min for each operator. As the number of operations increased, the operation time decreased, but there was no significant difference in implant accuracy between the different groups.

Conclusions: Within the scope of this study, robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrated high accuracy, with no significant differences in performance between operators with varying levels of clinical experience or implant robot-user experience. Furthermore, the learning curve for robotic implant surgery is steep and consistent.

Clinical relevance: Robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrates consistent high accuracy across operators of varying clinical and robotic experience levels, highlighting its potential to standardize procedures and enhance predictability in clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

种植牙临床经验对机器人辅助即刻种植体植入准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
目的:评估机器人辅助即刻种植手术中不同经验操作者的准确性和有效性:评估在机器人辅助即刻种植手术中具有不同经验水平的操作者的准确性和有效性:研究对象包括在同一机构接受过牙科培训但在种植牙方面具有不同临床经验的四名参与者,分别为本科生(UG)、牙科住院医师(DR)、无机器人经验的专科医生(IS)和有机器人经验的专科医生(RS)。经过全面的机器人辅助种植操作理论培训后,每位操作员在 21 个地点参与了 5 次机器人辅助种植手术,共完成了 20 个种植体的种植手术。随后,通过分析术前规划和术后 CBCT 扫描评估了种植体的准确性,并记录了每次手术所需的时间:结果:UG、DR、IS 和 RS 组的角度偏差分别为 0.82 ± 0.27°、0.55 ± 0.27°、0.83 ± 0.27°和 0.56 ± 0.36°。种植体平台点的总偏差分别为(0.28±0.10)毫米、(0.26±0.16)毫米、(0.34±0.08)毫米和(0.31±0.06)毫米。根尖点的总偏差分别为 0.30 ± 0.08 毫米、0.25 ± 0.18 毫米、0.31 ± 0.09 毫米和 0.31 ± 0.05 毫米。每位操作者花费的时间分别为 10.37 ± 0.57 分钟、10.56 ± 1.77 分钟、9.93 ± 0.78 分钟和 11.76 ± 0.78 分钟。随着操作次数的增加,操作时间有所减少,但不同组别之间的植入准确性没有显著差异:在本研究范围内,机器人辅助种植手术的准确性很高,不同临床经验或种植机器人用户经验的操作者之间的表现没有明显差异。此外,机器人植入手术的学习曲线陡峭而稳定:机器人辅助植入手术在不同临床经验和机器人经验水平的操作者之间表现出一致的高准确性,突显了其标准化程序和提高临床结果可预测性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信