Improved Risk Prediction Using a Refined European Guidelines Instrument in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Related to Congenital Heart Disease

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Alexandra C. van Dissel MD, PhD , Michele D'Alto MD, PhD , Andrea Farro MD , Harold Mathijssen MD, PhD , Marco C. Post MD, PhD , Pier P. Bassareo MD, PhD , Arie P.J. van Dijk MD, PhD , Barbara J.M. Mulder MD, PhD , Berto J. Bouma MD, PhD
{"title":"Improved Risk Prediction Using a Refined European Guidelines Instrument in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Related to Congenital Heart Disease","authors":"Alexandra C. van Dissel MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michele D'Alto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Farro MD ,&nbsp;Harold Mathijssen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marco C. Post MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pier P. Bassareo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Arie P.J. van Dijk MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Barbara J.M. Mulder MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Berto J. Bouma MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European guidelines advocate a goal-oriented treatment approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based on a comprehensive risk assessment instrument, which has been validated in several PAH subgroups. We investigated its discriminatory ability and explored tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and revised thresholds to improve its predictability within the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population.</div><div>In total, 223 adults (42 ± 16 years, 66% women, 68% Eisenmenger) were enrolled from 5 European PAH-CHD expert centers. Patients were classified as low, intermediate, or high risk at the baseline visit and at follow-up within 4 to 18 months. By the general PAH guidelines instrument, survival did not differ between the risk groups (p-value not significant), mostly because of the skewed group distribution. Reclassifying patients using revised thresholds for N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide and 6-minute walk distance (i.e., low, intermediate, and high as &lt;500, 500 to 1,400, &gt;1,400 ng/L and &gt;400, and 165 to 400 and &lt;165 m, respectively) and use of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (low, intermediate, and high as &gt;20, 16 to 20, and &lt;16 mm, respectively) significantly improved the discrimination between the risk groups at baseline and follow-up (p = 0.001, receiver operating characteristic increase from 0.648 to 0.701), reclassifying 64 patients (29%). Irrespective of follow-up risk group, survival was better for patients with higher proportions of low-risk variables. Improvement to a low-risk profile at a median of 9 months of follow-up provided improved survival compared with the survival of patients who remained in the low-risk group.</div><div>In conclusion, the external validity of general risk instrument for PAH appeared to be of limited discriminatory value in patients with PAH-CHD. We propose a refined risk instrument with improved discrimination for PAH-CHD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924006271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European guidelines advocate a goal-oriented treatment approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based on a comprehensive risk assessment instrument, which has been validated in several PAH subgroups. We investigated its discriminatory ability and explored tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and revised thresholds to improve its predictability within the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population.
In total, 223 adults (42 ± 16 years, 66% women, 68% Eisenmenger) were enrolled from 5 European PAH-CHD expert centers. Patients were classified as low, intermediate, or high risk at the baseline visit and at follow-up within 4 to 18 months. By the general PAH guidelines instrument, survival did not differ between the risk groups (p-value not significant), mostly because of the skewed group distribution. Reclassifying patients using revised thresholds for N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide and 6-minute walk distance (i.e., low, intermediate, and high as <500, 500 to 1,400, >1,400 ng/L and >400, and 165 to 400 and <165 m, respectively) and use of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (low, intermediate, and high as >20, 16 to 20, and <16 mm, respectively) significantly improved the discrimination between the risk groups at baseline and follow-up (p = 0.001, receiver operating characteristic increase from 0.648 to 0.701), reclassifying 64 patients (29%). Irrespective of follow-up risk group, survival was better for patients with higher proportions of low-risk variables. Improvement to a low-risk profile at a median of 9 months of follow-up provided improved survival compared with the survival of patients who remained in the low-risk group.
In conclusion, the external validity of general risk instrument for PAH appeared to be of limited discriminatory value in patients with PAH-CHD. We propose a refined risk instrument with improved discrimination for PAH-CHD.
使用改良的欧洲指南工具改进与先天性心脏病相关的肺动脉高压的风险预测。
欧洲指南提倡以目标为导向的肺动脉高压(PAH)治疗方法,该方法以综合风险评估工具为基础,已在多个 PAH 亚组中得到验证。我们研究了它的鉴别能力,并探讨了三尖瓣环面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)和修订后的阈值,以提高其在成人先天性心脏病(CHD)人群中的预测能力。欧洲五个 PAH-CHD 专家中心共招募了 223 名成人(42±16 岁,66% 女性,68% 艾森曼格)。在基线访问和 4-18 个月的随访中,患者被分为 "低"、"中 "或 "高 "风险。根据一般 PAH 指南工具,风险组之间的存活率没有差异(P=n.s.),这主要是由于组别分布偏斜所致。使用 N 端脑钠肽 (NT-proBNP) 和 6 分钟步行距离 (6MWD) 的修订阈值(即 "低"、"中"、"高 "分别为 1400 ng/l 和 >400、165-400 和 20、16-20 和 16-20)对患者进行重新分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信