Higher Rate of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Recurrence With Secondary Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis Compared With No Prophylaxis in 2 National Cirrhosis Cohorts.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003075
Scott Silvey, Nilang R Patel, Stephanie Y Tsai, Mahum Nadeem, Richard K Sterling, John D Markley, Evan French, Jacqueline G O'Leary, Jasmohan S Bajaj
{"title":"Higher Rate of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Recurrence With Secondary Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis Compared With No Prophylaxis in 2 National Cirrhosis Cohorts.","authors":"Scott Silvey, Nilang R Patel, Stephanie Y Tsai, Mahum Nadeem, Richard K Sterling, John D Markley, Evan French, Jacqueline G O'Leary, Jasmohan S Bajaj","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) bacteriology has changed over time. Reappraisal of primary SBP prophylaxis showed an increased rate of resistance in patients on primary prophylaxis with resultant discontinuation of this prophylaxis throughout the Veterans Affairs (VA). We aimed to re-evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of secondary SBP prophylaxis (SecSBPPr).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using validated International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes, we used the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and the Non-VA National TriNetX database to identify patients in 2 different large US systems who survived their first SBP diagnosis (with chart review from 2 VA centers) between 2009 and 2019. We evaluated the prevalence of SecSBPPr and compared outcomes between those who started on SecSBPPr vs not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 4,673 veterans who survived their index SBP episode; 54.3% of whom were prescribed SecSBPPr. Multivariable analysis showed higher SBP recurrence risk in those on vs off SecSBPPr (hazards ratio 1.63 [1.40-1.91], P < 0.001). This was accompanied by higher fluoroquinolone resistance odds in SecSBPPr patients (odds ratio = 4.32 [1.36-15.83], P = 0.03). In TriNetX, we identified 6,708 patients who survived their index SBP episode; 48.6% were on SecSBPPr. Multivariable analysis similarly showed SecSBPPr increased SBP recurrence risk (hazards ratio 1.68 [1.33-1.80], P < 0.001). Both data sets showed higher SBP recurrence trends over time in SecSBPPr patients. Results remained consistent at 6-month and 2-year timepoints.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In 2 national data sets of >11,000 patients with SBP, we found that SecSBPPr was prescribed in roughly half of patients. When initiated, SecSBPPr, compared with no prophylaxis after SBP, increased the risk of SBP recurrence in multivariable analysis by 63%-68%, and this trend worsened over time. SecSBPPr should be reconsidered in cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1066-1075"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) bacteriology has changed over time. Reappraisal of primary SBP prophylaxis showed an increased rate of resistance in patients on primary prophylaxis with resultant discontinuation of this prophylaxis throughout the Veterans Affairs (VA). We aimed to re-evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of secondary SBP prophylaxis (SecSBPPr).

Methods: Using validated International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes, we used the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and the Non-VA National TriNetX database to identify patients in 2 different large US systems who survived their first SBP diagnosis (with chart review from 2 VA centers) between 2009 and 2019. We evaluated the prevalence of SecSBPPr and compared outcomes between those who started on SecSBPPr vs not.

Results: We identified 4,673 veterans who survived their index SBP episode; 54.3% of whom were prescribed SecSBPPr. Multivariable analysis showed higher SBP recurrence risk in those on vs off SecSBPPr (hazards ratio 1.63 [1.40-1.91], P < 0.001). This was accompanied by higher fluoroquinolone resistance odds in SecSBPPr patients (odds ratio = 4.32 [1.36-15.83], P = 0.03). In TriNetX, we identified 6,708 patients who survived their index SBP episode; 48.6% were on SecSBPPr. Multivariable analysis similarly showed SecSBPPr increased SBP recurrence risk (hazards ratio 1.68 [1.33-1.80], P < 0.001). Both data sets showed higher SBP recurrence trends over time in SecSBPPr patients. Results remained consistent at 6-month and 2-year timepoints.

Discussion: In 2 national data sets of >11,000 patients with SBP, we found that SecSBPPr was prescribed in roughly half of patients. When initiated, SecSBPPr, compared with no prophylaxis after SBP, increased the risk of SBP recurrence in multivariable analysis by 63%-68%, and this trend worsened over time. SecSBPPr should be reconsidered in cirrhosis.

在两个全国肝硬化队列中,与不采取预防措施相比,采取二次 SBP 预防措施的 SBP 复发率更高。
背景:随着时间的推移,自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)细菌学发生了变化。对 SBP 一级预防措施的重新评估显示,接受一级预防措施的患者耐药率增加,导致整个退伍军人事务部停止使用这种预防措施。我们旨在重新评估二次 SBP 预防(SecSBPPr)的风险效益比:我们使用经过验证的 ICD 9/10 编码,利用退伍军人事务部企业数据仓库和非退伍军人事务部国家 TriNetX 数据库,在两个不同的大型美国系统中识别出 2009-2019 年间首次确诊 SBP 后存活的患者(通过两个退伍军人事务部中心的病历审查)。我们评估了SecSBPPr的患病率,并比较了开始使用SecSBPPr与未使用SecSBPPr患者的治疗效果:我们发现有 4673 名退伍军人在首次 SBP 发作后存活了下来;其中 54.3% 的人服用了 SecSBPPr。多变量分析显示,服用与未服用 SecSBPPr 的退伍军人 SBP 复发风险更高(HR-1.63[1.40-1.91],pConclusion):在两组超过 11,000 名 SBP 患者的全国性数据中,我们发现约有一半的患者服用了 SecSBPPr。开始使用 SecSBPPr 时,与 SBP 后不采取预防措施相比,在多变量分析中,SBP 复发风险增加了 63-68%,而且这一趋势随着时间的推移而恶化。肝硬化患者应重新考虑使用 SecSBPPr。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信