Effects of sampling healthy versus unhealthy foods on subsequent food purchases

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Dipayan Biswas, Annika Abell, Mikyoung Lim, J. Jeffrey Inman, Johanna Held
{"title":"Effects of sampling healthy versus unhealthy foods on subsequent food purchases","authors":"Dipayan Biswas, Annika Abell, Mikyoung Lim, J. Jeffrey Inman, Johanna Held","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01047-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food sampling at retail stores and restaurants (e.g., amuse bouche) is a widespread practice. These food samples vary considerably in healthfulness levels. Prior research has primarily focused on the effects of sampling on evaluations and sales of the sampled item. However, can there be unintended consequences of sampling a healthy versus an unhealthy item on subsequent purchases of <i>other</i> food items? Also, would the degree of dissimilarity between the sampled item and subsequent options moderate the effects? The results from a series of experiments, including four studies conducted in field settings, show that sampling a healthy (vs. unhealthy) item paradoxically leads to greater subsequent purchase/choice of unhealthy foods – but only when consumers perceive a relatively high level of dissimilarity between the sampled item and subsequent options. This effect reverses when the sampled food and subsequent options are perceived as being relatively low on dissimilarity (i.e., high on similarity).</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01047-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food sampling at retail stores and restaurants (e.g., amuse bouche) is a widespread practice. These food samples vary considerably in healthfulness levels. Prior research has primarily focused on the effects of sampling on evaluations and sales of the sampled item. However, can there be unintended consequences of sampling a healthy versus an unhealthy item on subsequent purchases of other food items? Also, would the degree of dissimilarity between the sampled item and subsequent options moderate the effects? The results from a series of experiments, including four studies conducted in field settings, show that sampling a healthy (vs. unhealthy) item paradoxically leads to greater subsequent purchase/choice of unhealthy foods – but only when consumers perceive a relatively high level of dissimilarity between the sampled item and subsequent options. This effect reverses when the sampled food and subsequent options are perceived as being relatively low on dissimilarity (i.e., high on similarity).

Abstract Image

健康食品和不健康食品样品对后续食品购买的影响
在零售店和餐馆提供食品样品(如小菜)是一种普遍做法。这些食品样品的健康程度差别很大。先前的研究主要集中在抽样对被抽样食品的评价和销售的影响上。然而,对健康食品和不健康食品进行抽样调查,是否会对后续购买其他食品产生意想不到的影响?此外,抽样商品与后续选择之间的差异程度是否会缓和这种影响?一系列实验(包括四项实地研究)的结果表明,健康食品(相对于不健康食品)的抽样调查会自相矛盾地导致消费者随后更多地购买/选择不健康食品--但只有当消费者认为抽样调查的食品与随后的选择之间存在较高程度的差异时才会出现这种情况。当消费者认为抽样食品和后续选项之间的相似度相对较低时(即相似度较高),这种效应就会发生逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信