Exploring seed density and limiting similarity to reduce invasive grass performance for grassland restoration purposes

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Pedro Augusto Thomas, Elise Buisson, Gerhard Ernst Overbeck, Sandra Cristina Müller
{"title":"Exploring seed density and limiting similarity to reduce invasive grass performance for grassland restoration purposes","authors":"Pedro Augusto Thomas,&nbsp;Elise Buisson,&nbsp;Gerhard Ernst Overbeck,&nbsp;Sandra Cristina Müller","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Control of invasive species and seed addition are key steps in grassland restoration. Nevertheless, selecting seed mixes and seed quantities are hard tasks in restoration projects. An interesting idea is to design seed mixes using functional traits and create a community based on limiting similarity to overlap and outcompete the invader. We aimed to test the effect of two sown communities (one created to overlap the invader niche) and three seed sowing densities to reduce the performance of the invasive grass <i>Eragrostis plana</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Greenhouse experiment in the <i>Campos Sulinos</i> grasslands region, Southern Brazil.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We created a bifactorial experiment. The first factor was the sown community, each composed of nine native grasses but with different proportions: (1) Limiting, based on limiting similarity, and (2) Balanced, where all species were sown at the same seed weight. We used leaf functional traits (Specific leaf area, leaf area, leaf dry matter content ) to design the Limiting community. The second factor was the seed density of native species, sowing twice (1) 1 g/m<sup>2</sup>, (2) 2 g/m<sup>2</sup>, and (3) 4 g/m<sup>2</sup> (i.e., total density was 2, 4, and 8 g/m<sup>2</sup>). <i>E. plana</i> was sown once at 0.5 g/m<sup>2</sup>. Above-ground and below-ground biomass of all species were collected after nine months to assess the treatment effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Biomass production of the invasive species was lower when sown with native species. Nevertheless, both sown communities did not differently affect the invasive biomass production. Higher seed density of native species resulted in lower invasive above-ground biomass, but not below-ground biomass. Three native species did not germinate, consequently, the established communities were quite different from those designed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The low species germination limited our discussion about the use of limiting similarity to design seed mixes. High seed sowing density is a better approach when defining sowing strategies to compete with invasive grasses.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

Control of invasive species and seed addition are key steps in grassland restoration. Nevertheless, selecting seed mixes and seed quantities are hard tasks in restoration projects. An interesting idea is to design seed mixes using functional traits and create a community based on limiting similarity to overlap and outcompete the invader. We aimed to test the effect of two sown communities (one created to overlap the invader niche) and three seed sowing densities to reduce the performance of the invasive grass Eragrostis plana.

Location

Greenhouse experiment in the Campos Sulinos grasslands region, Southern Brazil.

Methods

We created a bifactorial experiment. The first factor was the sown community, each composed of nine native grasses but with different proportions: (1) Limiting, based on limiting similarity, and (2) Balanced, where all species were sown at the same seed weight. We used leaf functional traits (Specific leaf area, leaf area, leaf dry matter content ) to design the Limiting community. The second factor was the seed density of native species, sowing twice (1) 1 g/m2, (2) 2 g/m2, and (3) 4 g/m2 (i.e., total density was 2, 4, and 8 g/m2). E. plana was sown once at 0.5 g/m2. Above-ground and below-ground biomass of all species were collected after nine months to assess the treatment effects.

Results

Biomass production of the invasive species was lower when sown with native species. Nevertheless, both sown communities did not differently affect the invasive biomass production. Higher seed density of native species resulted in lower invasive above-ground biomass, but not below-ground biomass. Three native species did not germinate, consequently, the established communities were quite different from those designed.

Conclusions

The low species germination limited our discussion about the use of limiting similarity to design seed mixes. High seed sowing density is a better approach when defining sowing strategies to compete with invasive grasses.

Abstract Image

探索种子密度和限制相似性,以降低入侵草的表现,达到恢复草原的目的
问题入侵物种控制和种子添加是草地恢复的关键步骤。然而,在恢复项目中,选择混合种子和种子数量是一项艰巨的任务。一个有趣的想法是利用功能特性设计混合种子,并根据限制相似性创建一个群落,以便与入侵者重叠并相互竞争。我们的目标是测试两种播种群落(其中一种群落与入侵者的生态位重叠)和三种播种密度对降低入侵草 Eragrostis plana 的表现的影响。 地点 巴西南部坎波斯苏利诺斯草原地区的温室实验。 方法 我们创建了一个双因子实验。第一个因素是播种群落,每个群落由九种本地草组成,但比例不同:(1) 限制性群落,基于限制性相似性;(2) 平衡性群落,所有物种以相同的种子重量播种。我们利用叶片功能特征(比叶面积、叶面积、叶干物质含量)来设计限制群落。第二个因素是本地物种的种子密度,播种两次(1)1 克/平方米,(2)2 克/平方米,(3)4 克/平方米(即总密度为 2、4 和 8 克/平方米)。E. plana 播种一次,播种量为 0.5 克/平方米。九个月后收集所有物种的地上和地下生物量,以评估处理效果。 结果 在播种本地物种时,入侵物种的生物量较低。尽管如此,两种播种群落对入侵生物量的影响并无不同。本地物种的种子密度越高,入侵物种的地上生物量越低,但地下生物量却不低。三个本地物种没有发芽,因此建立的群落与设计的群落有很大不同。 结论 物种发芽率低限制了我们对利用限制相似性来设计种子混合物的讨论。在确定与入侵草类竞争的播种策略时,高种子播种密度是更好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信