Registry study of cardiovascular death in Sweden 2013–2019: Home as place of death and specialized palliative care are the preserve of a minority

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Stina Nyblom , Joakim Öhlén , Cecilia Larsdotter , Anneli Ozanne , Carl Johan Fürst , Ragnhild Hedman
{"title":"Registry study of cardiovascular death in Sweden 2013–2019: Home as place of death and specialized palliative care are the preserve of a minority","authors":"Stina Nyblom ,&nbsp;Joakim Öhlén ,&nbsp;Cecilia Larsdotter ,&nbsp;Anneli Ozanne ,&nbsp;Carl Johan Fürst ,&nbsp;Ragnhild Hedman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Palliative care needs in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are expected to increase. For the planning of equitable palliative care, it is important to understand where people with CVD die. The aim was to examine trends in place of death, associated factors including utilization of specialized palliative services, and to what extent longitudinal development is influenced by national policy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A population-level registry study of place of death for adults deceased due to CVD (n = 209 671) in Sweden 2013–2019. Linear regression analysis was applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The predominant place of death was nursing home (39.1 %) and hospital (37.6 %), followed by home (22.0 %). From 2013 to 2019 home deaths increased by 2.8 % and hospital deaths decreased by 3.0 %. An overall downward trend was found for dying in hospital compared to dying at home. With variations, this trend was seen in all healthcare regions and for all CVD types, except Stockholm and cerebrovascular disease, with no significant trend. Overall, but with cross-regional variations, 2.1 % utilized specialized palliative services, while 94.2 % had potential palliative care needs. Other variables significantly influencing the trend were age and having had an unplanned healthcare visit.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite a slight positive trend, only a minority of people with CVD die in their own home. Regional variations in place of death and the low and varied utilization of specialized palliative services indicate inequity in access to palliative care. Hence, the impact of current national policies is questionable and calls for strengthening through inclusion of early palliative care in specific CVD policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277248752400093X/pdfft?md5=8d1035ae7c457452c162d19d3210bc6a&pid=1-s2.0-S277248752400093X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277248752400093X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Palliative care needs in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are expected to increase. For the planning of equitable palliative care, it is important to understand where people with CVD die. The aim was to examine trends in place of death, associated factors including utilization of specialized palliative services, and to what extent longitudinal development is influenced by national policy.

Methods

A population-level registry study of place of death for adults deceased due to CVD (n = 209 671) in Sweden 2013–2019. Linear regression analysis was applied.

Results

The predominant place of death was nursing home (39.1 %) and hospital (37.6 %), followed by home (22.0 %). From 2013 to 2019 home deaths increased by 2.8 % and hospital deaths decreased by 3.0 %. An overall downward trend was found for dying in hospital compared to dying at home. With variations, this trend was seen in all healthcare regions and for all CVD types, except Stockholm and cerebrovascular disease, with no significant trend. Overall, but with cross-regional variations, 2.1 % utilized specialized palliative services, while 94.2 % had potential palliative care needs. Other variables significantly influencing the trend were age and having had an unplanned healthcare visit.

Conclusion

Despite a slight positive trend, only a minority of people with CVD die in their own home. Regional variations in place of death and the low and varied utilization of specialized palliative services indicate inequity in access to palliative care. Hence, the impact of current national policies is questionable and calls for strengthening through inclusion of early palliative care in specific CVD policies.

2013-2019年瑞典心血管疾病死亡登记研究:以家为死亡地点和专业姑息治疗是少数人的专利
背景心血管疾病(CVD)患者的姑息关怀需求预计将增加。为了规划公平的姑息关怀,了解心血管疾病患者的死亡地点非常重要。目的是研究死亡地点的趋势、相关因素(包括专业姑息治疗服务的利用率)以及纵向发展在多大程度上受国家政策的影响。方法对瑞典2013-2019年因心血管疾病死亡的成年人(n = 209 671)的死亡地点进行人口级登记研究。结果最主要的死亡地点是疗养院(39.1%)和医院(37.6%),其次是家中(22.0%)。从 2013 年到 2019 年,居家死亡人数增加了 2.8%,医院死亡人数减少了 3.0%。与在家中死亡相比,在医院死亡的人数总体呈下降趋势。除斯德哥尔摩和脑血管疾病无显著趋势外,所有医疗保健地区和所有心血管疾病类型都呈现出不同的趋势。总体而言,2.1%的患者使用了专门的姑息治疗服务,而94.2%的患者有潜在的姑息治疗需求,但各地区之间存在差异。对这一趋势有重大影响的其他变量是年龄和曾接受过计划外医疗服务。死亡地点的地区差异以及专业姑息治疗服务利用率的低和差异表明,在获得姑息治疗方面存在不公平现象。因此,现行国家政策的影响值得怀疑,需要通过将早期姑息关怀纳入具体的心血管疾病政策来加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信